Conventional Versus Left Bundle Branch Pacing in TAVI

NCT ID: NCT05895097

Last Updated: 2023-06-08

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

50 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-06-15

Study Completion Date

2026-06-15

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This randomized study compares the effects of conventional (right ventricular pacing in patients with LVEF ≥ 40% and cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with LVEF \< 40 %) versus left bundle branch pacing on left ventricular remodelling in patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (\< 50 %) that need permanent pacemaker implantation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Bradycardic heart rhythm disturbances are a common complication of TAVI. Patients who will develop the indication for permanent pacemaker implantation after TAVI will be randomly assigned to either the experimental (left bundle branch pacing) or conventional (right ventricular pacing in patients with LVEF ≥ 40% and cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with LVEF \< 40 %) group. The investigators will compare the left ventricular ejection fraction (primary outcome) 12 months after randomization. The investigators will also compare electrocardiographic (QRS duration), clinical (NYHA status, 6-minute walking test, handgrip test, Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire) and laboratory (proBNP) parameters 6 and 12 months, and other echocardiographic (left ventricular systolic and diastolic diameter, signs of dyssynchrony, myocardial work) parameters 12 months after pacemaker implantation in both groups.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Aortic Valve Stenosis Heart Failure Pacemaker-Induced Cardiomyopathy Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Conventional pacing

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Conventional pacing

Intervention Type DEVICE

Right ventricular pacing in patients with LVEF ≥ 40% and cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with LVEF \< 40 %

LBB pacing

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Left bundle branch pacemaker

Intervention Type DEVICE

Left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) will be the pacing technique. In brief, after localizing the His bundle area the LBBP lead will be positioned approximately 1-1.5 cm distal to the His bundle position in the right ventricular septum. Before screwing the lead deep into the interventricular septum, the suitable position will be confirmed by fluoroscopic signs and adequate paced QSR morphology. Final lead position will be confirmed according to ECG parameters. Given that the pacing parameters with LBBP are typically low and stable, backup RV lead will not be mandatory.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Left bundle branch pacemaker

Left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) will be the pacing technique. In brief, after localizing the His bundle area the LBBP lead will be positioned approximately 1-1.5 cm distal to the His bundle position in the right ventricular septum. Before screwing the lead deep into the interventricular septum, the suitable position will be confirmed by fluoroscopic signs and adequate paced QSR morphology. Final lead position will be confirmed according to ECG parameters. Given that the pacing parameters with LBBP are typically low and stable, backup RV lead will not be mandatory.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Conventional pacing

Right ventricular pacing in patients with LVEF ≥ 40% and cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with LVEF \< 40 %

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Indication for permanent pacemaker implantation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (during the same hospitalization)
* Left ventricular ejection fraction \< 50 %.

Exclusion Criteria

* Unsuccessful TAVI procedure with life expectancy \< 1 year
* Ischemic cardiomyopathy with interventricular septal fibrosis (at least echocardiographic signs of fibrosis)
* Severe kidney failure (glomerular filtration rate \< 30 ml/min)
* Previous permanent pacemaker
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Medical Centre Ljubljana

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Klemen Steblovnik

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University Medical Centre Ljubljana

Ljubljana, , Slovenia

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Slovenia

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Klemen Steblovnik, MD, PhD

Role: primary

0038615228529

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

PACE TAVI

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Functional Assessment in TAVI: FAITAVI
NCT03360591 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA
TAVR With Echocardiography Guidance
NCT07035847 RECRUITING NA