Pain Neuroscience Education and Motor Imagery-based Exercise Protocol for Patients With Fibromyalgia

NCT ID: NCT05890326

Last Updated: 2023-06-06

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

50 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-11-20

Study Completion Date

2023-05-02

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The main aim of this study is to find out whether applying both pain neuroscience education (PNE) and motor imagery-based exercise protocol (MIEP) will primarily reduce the pain of fibromyalgia. These therapies could show an evidence of improvement in fibromyalgia patients. However, there are no studies evaluating their effectiveness in combination.

Secondary outcomes:

To assess motor imagery ability of PNE in fibromyalgia patients

To assess motor imagery ability of MIEP in fibromyalgia patients

To evaluate the motor imagery ability of PNE+MIEP combined in fibromyalgia patients

To evaluate pain beliefs of PNE in fibromyalgia patients

To assess the pain beliefs of MIEP in fibromyalgia patients

Combined PNE+MIEP to assess pain beliefs in fibromyalgia patients.

To assess fear of movement in fibromyalgia patients of PNE

To assess fear of movement in fibromyalgia patients of MIEP

Combined PNE+MIEP to assess fear of movement in patients with fibromyalgia

PNE to assess anxiety, depression, cognitive and mood in patients with fibromyalgia.

To assess anxiety, depression, cognitive and mood in patients with fibromyalgia MIEP

To evaluate anxiety, depression, cognitive and mood in patients with fibromyalgia together with PNE+MIEP

PNE to assess self-esteem and body awareness in fibromyalgia patients.

To assess self-esteem and body awareness in fibromyalgia patients of MIEP

Combined PNE+MIEP to assess self-esteem and body awareness in fibromyalgia patients.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Fibromyalgia Pain Psychology Regression

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Control group

No intervention was applied to fibromyalgia patients in this group. This was because it was a control group that would evaluate the effects on outcomes by comparing them with other intervention (behavioral) groups.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Motor imagery-based exercise protocol (MIEP)

Motor imagery-based exercise protocol (MIEP) applied in this group.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Motor imagery-based exercise protocol (MIEP)

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

All patients performed sessions of maximum 60 minutes in groups of 3-4 people twice a week for 12 weeks. This study protocol was developed in accordance with the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) guidelines. The key standard was to practice simple and safe exercises that would encourage the patient to repeat the program at home. The exercises proposed in MIEP were selected according to the following principles: slowness, painlessness, arousing attention, easy to imagine. The main purpose of the motor imagery exercises was to bring the patient back to the state of "feeling and self-perception" of the execution of the movement. More important than the "quantity" of repetition was the painless "quality" of movement. It was performed in 3 phases: relaxation (3 minutes), MI (8.5 minutes per image) and refocus (3 minutes), which included both kinesthetic imagery (KI) and visual imagery (VI).

Pain neuroscience education (PNE)

Pain neuroscience education (PNE) applied in this group.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Pain neuroscience education (PNE)

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Pain neuroscience education (PNE) is a health education intervention that aims to provide up-to-date information on neuroscience developments in the field of chronic pain. All patients were trained once a week for 12 weeks, in groups of 3-4 people, for a maximum of 6 sessions and a minimum of 60 minutes. During the intervention, psychological factors such as self-efficacy, pain intervention/injury, coping with pain, catastrophic thoughts, emotional response to pain, anxiety, frustration/anger, fear of harm, concerns about pain, and fear of pain were examined. and discussed with patients. The sessions aimed to provide patients with a better understanding of their chronic pain by addressing the multifactorial aspects of chronic pain, sensitization and the plasticity of the brain, thus involving patients in treatment.

Combination Group

Both Pain neuroscience education (PNE) and Motor imagery-based exercise protocol (MIEP) applied in this group.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Combination Group

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Subjects received 6 sessions of Pain neuroscience education (PNE) and 12 weeks (2 times a week) of Motor imagery-based exercise protocol (MIEP).

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Pain neuroscience education (PNE)

Pain neuroscience education (PNE) is a health education intervention that aims to provide up-to-date information on neuroscience developments in the field of chronic pain. All patients were trained once a week for 12 weeks, in groups of 3-4 people, for a maximum of 6 sessions and a minimum of 60 minutes. During the intervention, psychological factors such as self-efficacy, pain intervention/injury, coping with pain, catastrophic thoughts, emotional response to pain, anxiety, frustration/anger, fear of harm, concerns about pain, and fear of pain were examined. and discussed with patients. The sessions aimed to provide patients with a better understanding of their chronic pain by addressing the multifactorial aspects of chronic pain, sensitization and the plasticity of the brain, thus involving patients in treatment.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Motor imagery-based exercise protocol (MIEP)

All patients performed sessions of maximum 60 minutes in groups of 3-4 people twice a week for 12 weeks. This study protocol was developed in accordance with the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) guidelines. The key standard was to practice simple and safe exercises that would encourage the patient to repeat the program at home. The exercises proposed in MIEP were selected according to the following principles: slowness, painlessness, arousing attention, easy to imagine. The main purpose of the motor imagery exercises was to bring the patient back to the state of "feeling and self-perception" of the execution of the movement. More important than the "quantity" of repetition was the painless "quality" of movement. It was performed in 3 phases: relaxation (3 minutes), MI (8.5 minutes per image) and refocus (3 minutes), which included both kinesthetic imagery (KI) and visual imagery (VI).

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Combination Group

Subjects received 6 sessions of Pain neuroscience education (PNE) and 12 weeks (2 times a week) of Motor imagery-based exercise protocol (MIEP).

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Experiencing widespread chronic pain for more than 12 months
* Pain in at least 12 or more of 18 tender points with a pressure of 5 kg/cm2
* 18 to 60 years old
* Not using pharmacological therapeutics
* Not having participated in any pain program.
* Not having participated in any physical exercise programs in the last twelve

Exclusion Criteria

* Pregnancy
* Not being able to do a physical activity program
* Currently receiving treatment with any alternative medical methods (eg.hyperbaric).
* Cardiovascular, psychiatric, autoimmune, cancer, etc. children with secondary different disease
* Other causes of chronic pain
* Receiving any treatment support related to pain
* Mental disability status
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Uskudar University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Mesut Karahan

Assoc. Prof.

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Selin Kırcali, Msc

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Üsküdar University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Uskudar University

Istanbul, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

fibromyalgiaUSK

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Pain Management Techniques for Fibromyalgia
NCT00086060 COMPLETED PHASE1/PHASE2