Carbon Sprinting Spiked-Shoes Trial

NCT ID: NCT05881148

Last Updated: 2023-11-02

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

21 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-06-03

Study Completion Date

2023-08-06

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Objectives :

To determine intra and inter-subject sprinting performance modifications with trademarked Carbon-made spiked-Shoes (CS) compared to usual carbon-free ones (Standard spiked-Shoes-SS).

Methods :

Design. Multiple N-of-1 trial (Alternating Treatments Design), with block randomisation and double blind procedure. For each participants, sixteen repetitions of 30m-sprint are applied either with CS or SS, in random order for each repetition, during a 3h session a day. Blind procedures are reached by applying a dark sleeve cover on each shoes, and by separating raters from investigators.

Patients. Regional to National healthy sprinting athletes (750 IAAF/WA points), affiliated to the French Athletics Federation among the South Regional Athletic League (Comité du Var-FFA), are recruited as volunteers, with their own CS (from the same brand for homogeneity and generalisation concerns) and SS.

Main criteria. Time on a 30-meters sprint, with Force-Velocity Profiling (FVP) procedure, using Stalker Sport radar.

Secondary outcome measures. F0, V0, Vmax, Pmax , DRP and other standard FVP parameters, also measured with MySprint software; morphometric and cinematic data ; mean price difference between the two models.

Statistical analyses. A block randomisation model will be applied to check for the randoms size; variance analysis with a mixt linear model will be applied for group and confounding factors analysis. Student-T test and NAP will be applied for intra-individuals analysis.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Setting. The medical commission of the Var Athletics Committee (VAC), composed by medicine doctors, physiotherapists, universitary sport-scientists and FFA coaches, was in charge of the project, at Toulon conurbation and Draguignan, France.

Design. N-of-1 Trials is the usual term for randomized, double-blind SCEDs. This one has been designed as an Alternating Treatment Design (ATD), one of the four SCEDs types 25.

Due to the strict " on-off " intervention effect, no potential interference was expected between phases, and a " best treatment " final phase seems not necessary in the absence of carry-over or interaction effects. After discussion with coaches and athletes, the main constraint was to respect a single day " standard " short-sprint training session (i.e commonly 5 to 15 repetitions, up to 500m total volume). Respecting these conditions and the preference of athletes, ATD method seemed the more appropriate, allowing the most cycle comparisons in the same time span.

Procedure. For each participants, sixteen repetitions (2 sets of 8) of maximal 30m-sprint are applied, on the same track, either with " carbon super-spikes " (CS) or standard spikes (SS), in random order for each repetition, during a 3h total session a day. Repetitions are preceded by a full warm-up, and followed by a cool-down phase. Rest time between sets and repetitions is standardised (20 and 8-10 minutes).

Block starting can't be choosen in order to limit bias (reaction time, adjustment…) and to allow radar records at the pelvis height (1-m high), as recommended, so that a split-stance starting position was adopted, without any starter (" as soon as ready ").

A path is created between a " polling booth " zone, and the start- and finish lines. In this blinding zone, athletes are sitted on a wheelchair, blindfolded, and putted on with their shoes, which are already covered by dark socks allowing spikes free (athletes' visual blinding). Footwear management by the investigators avoid athletes to have tactile information (athletes'somesthesic blinding). Shoes can not be seen by raters (assessors' visual blinding) or other athletes in that zone. They are then driven to the start-line with the wheelchair, in order to limit gait sensation due to important differences in foams ± air-pods between CS and SS (athletes' proprioceptive blinding). This last point was added after athletes' contribution to the method.

At the start-line, they are asked for their belief between CS or SS, so that a " doubt " rate can be assessed to check for the blind paradigm. Then the blindfold is removed, and the subject stand-up in the starting position.

After the finish-line, a 20m deceleration zone is ended by a wheelchair, where athletes are blindfolded again, shoes tooken off and bringed back to the polling booth zone, as athletes enter the rest zone.

The wind is controlled with the official WA/FFA method and anemometer. The shoes weight is assessed, and standardised, when needed, with the addition of 20g ballasts glued at the heel, so that weight difference is decreased (\<50g).

Data are collected and examined by two assessors blinded from the randomisation list.

Subjects. Healthy ≥ 15 years-old athletes presenting with a 750 IAAF/World Athletics points level in sprinting (60-400m), and affiliated to the VAC, are screened with the SIFFA software (Système d'Information-FFA). Fourty-six athletes are eligible, and are contacted by email, as their coaches, for information letter. Due to homogeneity and generalisation concerns, they have to have their own or lended Nike Zoom Maxfly or Victory style. Twenty-five respond positively, and N=21 are availables for one of the half-day-proposed sessions and are included.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Sprint Performance Carbon Spiked-shoe Force-velocity Profile N of 1 Study Design

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Multiple N-of-1 Trial: within-subjects repetitive blinded randomized crossovers
Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors
Each participant is self-blinded, but also blinded to other participants ' alternative order

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Carbon sprinting Super-spikes

Trademarked Carbon Spiked-Shoes, from one Trademark only to ensure generalization concerns, is used alternatively with standard carbon-free spiked-shoes, for 8 repetitions of 30m-sprint each, separated by 10 minutes rest each.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Carbon sprinting spiked-shoes

Intervention Type OTHER

Trademarked Carbon Spiked-Shoes, from one Trademark only to ensure generalization concerns, is used alternatively with standard carbon-free spiked-shoes, for 8 repetitions of 30m-sprint each, separated by 10 minutes rest each.

Standard sprinting carbon-free spiked-shoe

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Standard carbon-free sprinting spiked-shoes

Intervention Type OTHER

cf

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Carbon sprinting spiked-shoes

Trademarked Carbon Spiked-Shoes, from one Trademark only to ensure generalization concerns, is used alternatively with standard carbon-free spiked-shoes, for 8 repetitions of 30m-sprint each, separated by 10 minutes rest each.

Intervention Type OTHER

Standard carbon-free sprinting spiked-shoes

cf

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

carbon super-spikes

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Sprinting athletes affiliated to the French Athletic Federation among the Var Athletics Comity
* Sprint Performance \> 750pts IAAF/WA (50 to 400m)

Exclusion Criteria

* Age\<15
* Ongoing Injury
Minimum Eligible Age

15 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Hôpital Léon Bérard

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Benjamin BERNUZ, MD

Dr Bernuz Benjamin; PMR; MD-MSc

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Hopital Leon Berard

Hyères, Var, France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Samozino P, Rabita G, Dorel S, Slawinski J, Peyrot N, Saez de Villarreal E, Morin JB. A simple method for measuring power, force, velocity properties, and mechanical effectiveness in sprint running. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2016 Jun;26(6):648-58. doi: 10.1111/sms.12490. Epub 2015 May 21.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25996964 (View on PubMed)

Edouard P, Lahti J, Nagahara R, Samozino P, Navarro L, Guex K, Rossi J, Brughelli M, Mendiguchia J, Morin JB. Low Horizontal Force Production Capacity during Sprinting as a Potential Risk Factor of Hamstring Injury in Football. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 23;18(15):7827. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18157827.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 34360125 (View on PubMed)

Nagahara R, Kanehisa H, Fukunaga T. Influence of shoe sole bending stiffness on sprinting performance. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2018 Dec;58(12):1735-1740. doi: 10.23736/S0022-4707.17.07834-3. Epub 2017 Oct 27.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29083127 (View on PubMed)

Bernuz B, Laujac S, Sirial C, Auffret S, Preda C, Slawinski J, Millot B, Pradon D, Coudrat L, Gavarry O. Effect of Advanced Footwear Technology Spikes on Sprint Acceleration: A Multiple N-of-1 Trial. Sports Med Open. 2024 Aug 30;10(1):92. doi: 10.1186/s40798-024-00758-w.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 39214886 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2023-CS3T-Multiple N-of-1Trial

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Compression Stockings in Ankle Sprain
NCT01259752 COMPLETED PHASE3