Influence of Foot Types on Collegiate Athletes

NCT ID: NCT05992129

Last Updated: 2023-08-15

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

97 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-08-01

Study Completion Date

2023-05-19

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of the study is to assess whether high or low arch foot types influence the overall performance of the athlete.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

After meeting the eligibility criteria for the study, university athletes have their general athletic condition variables evaluated in the laboratory and in the field. Subsequently, athletes with high and low arches perform 12-week foot muscle strengthening exercises to re-evaluate the variables in both athletes with high and low arch types who performed the strengthening exercises, as well as those with neutral arch who did not perform the exercises.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Healthy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

After initial measurements of dependent variables (electromyographic activity amplitude of core muscles, static stability, dynamic stability, ergospirometry, countermovement jump, and 40m sprint test), athletes are divided into two groups: 1) Case group, which is further classified into (a) athletes with high arched feet and (b) athletes with flat feet, and 2) Control group, consisting of athletes with neutral feet. The case group performs intrinsic and extrinsic foot muscle strengthening exercises for 12 weeks, while the control group does not engage in these exercises. Following intervention, both case and control groups are re-evaluated in dependent variables to conduct pre-post intervention variable comparisons.
Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

structural foot types and their influence on core in collegiate athletes

Athletes do 12 weeks of exercises and then evaluate how they influenced core stability

Group Type OTHER

foot exercise

Intervention Type OTHER

These are foot and ankle muscle strengthening exercises described and evaluated by the literature

structural foot types and their influence on performance in collgiate athletes

Athletes do 12 weeks of exercises and then evaluate how they influenced on sport performance

Group Type OTHER

foot exercise

Intervention Type OTHER

These are foot and ankle muscle strengthening exercises described and evaluated by the literature

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

foot exercise

These are foot and ankle muscle strengthening exercises described and evaluated by the literature

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* University athletes with 4 years of continuous training
* high foot
* low foot.
* Neutral foot

Exclusion Criteria

* Any pain
* active injuries
* biomechanical alteration in their lower extremities.
* Spine disorders
* Spine surgery
* abdominal surgery,
* neural or vestibular disease
* arthritis of the lower extremities
* used of alcohol, sedatives, pain relievers, cold medication, or stimulants in the last year
* rigid pronated foot
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

26 Years

Eligible Sex

MALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Universidad del Magdalena

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Orlando Santiago Moreno Barriga

physician

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

orlando santiago Moreno barriga

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Universidad del Magdalena

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Universidad del Magdalena

Santa Marta, Magdalena Department, Colombia

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Colombia

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Oliva-Lozano JM, Muyor JM. Core Muscle Activity During Physical Fitness Exercises: A Systematic Review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jun 16;17(12):4306. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17124306.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32560185 (View on PubMed)

Garcia-Vaquero MP, Moreside JM, Brontons-Gil E, Peco-Gonzalez N, Vera-Garcia FJ. Trunk muscle activation during stabilization exercises with single and double leg support. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2012 Jun;22(3):398-406. doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2012.02.017. Epub 2012 Mar 20.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22436839 (View on PubMed)

Marcos MA, Koulla PM, Anthos ZI. Preseason Maximal Aerobic Power in Professional Soccer Players Among Different Divisions. J Strength Cond Res. 2018 Feb;32(2):356-363. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001810.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29369953 (View on PubMed)

Bobbert MF, Gerritsen KG, Litjens MC, Van Soest AJ. Why is countermovement jump height greater than squat jump height? Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1996 Nov;28(11):1402-12. doi: 10.1097/00005768-199611000-00009.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 8933491 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Document Type: Informed Consent Form

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CTUM212170

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.