The PROTEMBO Trial

NCT ID: NCT05873816

Last Updated: 2026-01-09

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

284 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-03-21

Study Completion Date

2025-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The goal of this prospective, multi-center, randomized, controlled study is to compare the safety and efficacy of the ProtEmbo Cerebral Embolic Protection device to a hybrid control (no embolic protection device ('No Device') and the Sentinel device) in subjects with severe symptomatic native aortic valve stenosis indicated undergoing a TAVR procedure.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Subjects with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis undergoing TAVR will be able to participate. Participants will be randomized in a 2:1:1 fashion to either the ProtEmbo arm, the Sentinel arm, or the 'No device' arm.

Enrolled subjects will undergo an MRI at baseline and at 36 hours ±12 hours, to evaluate any new cerebral lesions. Enrolled subjects will be followed for 30 days.

The study aims to address:

* whether the occurrence of all Major Adverse Cardiac and Cerebrovascular Events (MACCE) at 30 days is comparable between the ProtEmbo group and the hybrid control group.
* whether the total new lesion volume in the brain assessed by diffusion weighted magnetic resonance images at 36 ±12 hours is comparable between the ProtEmbo group and the hybrid control group.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Severe Aortic Valve Stenosis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

ProtEmbo - Cerebral Embolic Protection

Subjects will undergo TAVR following placement of the ProtEmbo cerebral embolic protection device.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

ProtEmbo - Cerebral Embolic Protection

Intervention Type DEVICE

Subjects will undergo TAVR following placement of the ProtEmbo cerebral embolic protection device.

Sentinel - Cerebral Embolic Protection

Subjects will undergo TAVR following placement of the Sentinel cerebral embolic protection device.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Sentinel - Cerebral Embolic Protection

Intervention Type DEVICE

Subjects will undergo TAVR following placement of the Sentinel cerebral embolic protection device.

Control Arm

Subjects will undergo TAVR without embolic protection.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

ProtEmbo - Cerebral Embolic Protection

Subjects will undergo TAVR following placement of the ProtEmbo cerebral embolic protection device.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Sentinel - Cerebral Embolic Protection

Subjects will undergo TAVR following placement of the Sentinel cerebral embolic protection device.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. The heart team recommends transcatheter aortic valve replacement via femoral access consistent with the 2020 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease.
2. The subject and the treating physician agree that the subject will undergo the scheduled pre procedural testing and return for all required post procedure follow up visits.
3. The subject is able to provide informed consent, has been informed of the nature of the trial, agrees to its provisions and has provided written informed consent as approved by the relevant regulatory authority of the respective clinical site.
4. Subject is a minimum of 18 years of age.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Subject is a woman of child-bearing potential.
2. Arm anatomy/ vasculature precluding radial or brachial artery access.
3. Hemodialysis shunt, graft, or arterio-venous fistula involving the upper extremity vasculature.
4. Evidence of an acute myocardial infarction ≤ 1 month before the intended treatment.
5. Severe ventricular dysfunction with LVEF ≤25%.
6. Any therapeutic invasive cardiac procedure resulting in a permanent implant that is performed within 10 days of the index procedure.
7. Blood dyscrasias as defined by clinically significant leukopenia (\< 500 leukocytes / μL), acute anemia (Hgb \< 8 g / dL), thrombocytopenia (\< 80,000 platelets / μl), history of bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy.
8. Hemodynamic instability, or pressure dependence requiring pharmacological inotropic support or mechanical heart assistance.
9. Echocardiographic evidence of intracardiac or aortic mass, thrombus not adequately treated, or vegetation.
10. Active peptic ulcer or upper GI bleeding within the prior 6 months.
11. Contraindication for anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapy.
12. Renal insufficiency (creatinine \> 3.0 mg / dL or GFR \< 30) and / or renal replacement therapy at the time of screening and dialysis patients.
13. Current or planned treatment with any investigational drug or investigational device during the study follow-up period (30 days).
14. Balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) within 30 days of the procedure.
15. Cardiogenic shock, hemodynamic instability, or severe hypotension (systolic blood pressure \< 90 mm Hg) at the time of the index procedure.
16. Cardiovascular surgical or interventional procedure 10 days prior or planned during the TAVR procedure or during the 30-day study follow-up.
17. Patients with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)

NOTE: Use of general anesthesia during TAVR may affect neurocognitive function shortly after the procedure. While not an exclusion criterion, it is recommended that general anesthesia not be used if possible.


1. Cerebrovascular event including TIA within 6 months of the procedure.
2. Subject had active major psychiatric disease.
3. Subject has severe visual, auditory, or learning impairment and is unable to comprehend English or local language and therefore unable to be consented for the study.
4. Subjects with neurodegenerative or other progressive neurological disease or history of significant head trauma followed by persistent neurologic defaults or known structural brain abnormalities.


1. Body Mass Index (BMI) precluding imaging in scanner.
2. Contraindications to MRI (subjects with any implantable temporary or permanent pacemaker or defibrillator, metal implants in field of view, metallic fragments, clips, or devices in the brain or eye before TAVR procedure).
3. High risk of complete AV block after TAVR, with the need of permanent pacemaker (e.g., subjects with pre-existing bifascicular block or complete right bundle branch block plus any degree of AV block).
4. Planned implantation of a pacemaker or defibrillator implantation within the first 3 days after TAVR.
5. Claustrophobia precluding MRI scanning.


1. Excessive tortuosity in left subclavian artery (≥ 70° single kink or ≥ 50° in sequential kinks).
2. Excessive tortuosity in right vascular access vessels for Sentinel introduction.
3. Significant stenosis (≥ 70%), calcification, ectasia, dissection, occlusion, aneurysm, or severe peripheral arterial disease in left or right arm access vessels - in particular at or within 3 cm of the aortic ostia.
4. Left subclavian artery diameter is ≤ 4 mm.
5. Brachiocephalic artery at the site of Sentinel filter placement \< 9 mm or \> 15 mm.
6. Left common artery at the site of Sentinel filter placement \< 6.5 mm or \> 10 mm.
7. Symptomatic or asymptomatic severe (≥ 70%) occlusive carotid disease requiring concomitant CEA / stenting.
8. Inner diameter of aortic arch \< 25 mm as measured in any position between ascending aorta and ostium of left subclavian artery.
9. Distance between the origin of left subclavian artery and valve plain of \< 90 mm.
10. Common ostium of cerebral vessels, where all three vessels originate from one single ostium in the aortic arch.
11. Significant stenosis, ectasia, dissection, aneurysm, or atheroma (mobile or \> 5 mm thick) in the ascending aorta or in the aortic arch.
12. Significant angulation of the proximal segment of the left subclavian or aortic arch angulation or abnormal anatomical conditions of the aorta (a Type 3 aortic arch is not a reason for exclusion).
13. Distance between the origin of brachiocephalic trunk and left subclavian artery of \> 65 mm.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Protembis GmbH

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Roxana Mehran, MD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Tucson Medical Center Health

Tucson, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

BayCare Health System / Morton Plant Hospital

Clearwater, Florida, United States

Site Status

University of Michigan

Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Saint Luke&#39;s Hospital of Kansas City

Kansas City, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Washington University - St. Louis

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Morristown Medical Center

Morristown, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

State University of New York at Buffalo

Buffalo, New York, United States

Site Status

NYU Langone

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Mount Sinai Hospital

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Columbia University Medical Center / NYPH

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Weill Medical College / Cornell University

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

University of Texas, Memorial Hermann Hospital

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

University of Virginia, Charlottesville

Charlottesville, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Medical College of Wisconsin

Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Dresden Herzzentrum

Dresden, , Germany

Site Status

Lübeck Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein Campus

Lübeck, , Germany

Site Status

Trier Krankenhaus der Barmherzigen Brüder

Trier, , Germany

Site Status

Ulm Universitätsklinikum

Ulm, , Germany

Site Status

Gdansk Uniwersyteckie Centrum Kliniczne

Gdansk, , Poland

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Germany Poland

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CIP_00250

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Sentinel Low Risk Registry
NCT04131127 COMPLETED
PREVENT: Promus BTK
NCT01500070 COMPLETED PHASE2
FlexNav EU CE Mark Study
NCT03724812 COMPLETED NA
GORE Embolic Protection With Reverse Flow
NCT00594100 COMPLETED PHASE3