Cerebral Protection in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

NCT ID: NCT02214277

Last Updated: 2018-05-11

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

363 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-09-30

Study Completion Date

2016-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The Sentinel System will be a safe and effective method for capturing and removing embolic material (thrombus/debris) during transcatheter aortic valve replacement in order to reduce the ischemic burden in the cerebral anterior circulation.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The Sentinel™ Cerebral Protection System is indicated for use as an embolic capture and retrieval system intended to reduce the ischemic burden in the cerebral anterior circulation while performing transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

The objective of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy of the Claret Medical Sentinel Cerebral Protection System used for embolic protection during Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR) compared to TAVR standard of care (without embolic protection).

The study population is comprised of subjects with severe symptomatic calcified native aortic valve stenosis who meet the commercially approved indications for TAVR with the Edwards SAPIEN THV or SAPIEN XT and comply with the inclusion/exclusion criteria.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Severe Symptomatic Calcified Native Aortic Valve Stenosis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Test Arm

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Cerebral Protection System-The SENTINEL System with TAVR

Intervention Type DEVICE

Claret Medical Sentinel Cerebral Protection System is intended for use as an embolic protection system to contain and remove embolic material (thrombus/debris) that may enter the carotid arteries.

Control Arm

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

TAVR

Intervention Type DEVICE

Safety Arm

Group Type OTHER

Cerebral Protection System-The SENTINEL System with TAVR

Intervention Type DEVICE

Claret Medical Sentinel Cerebral Protection System is intended for use as an embolic protection system to contain and remove embolic material (thrombus/debris) that may enter the carotid arteries.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Cerebral Protection System-The SENTINEL System with TAVR

Claret Medical Sentinel Cerebral Protection System is intended for use as an embolic protection system to contain and remove embolic material (thrombus/debris) that may enter the carotid arteries.

Intervention Type DEVICE

TAVR

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Cerebral Protection System: The SENTINEL System TAVR Device: Edwards SAPIEN THV or Edwards SAPIEN XT TAVR: Edwards SAPIEN THV or Edwards SAPIEN XT

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Approved indications for commercially available Edwards SAPIEN Transcatheter Heart Valve, model 9000TFX or SAPIEN XT, model 9300TFX meeting one of the three sub-criteria below:

SAPIEN
1. transfemoral delivery in subjects with severe symptomatic calcified native aortic valve stenosis without severe aortic insufficiency and with ejection fraction \>20% who have been examined by a heart team including an experienced cardiac surgeon and a cardiologist and found to either be:

1. inoperable and in whom existing co-morbidities would not preclude the expected benefit from correction of the aortic stenosis; or
2. be operative candidates for aortic valve replacement but who have a Society of Thoracic Surgeons predicted operative risk score \>8% or are judged by the heart team to be at a 15% risk of mortality for surgical aortic valve replacement.

or
2. transapical delivery in subjects with severe symptomatic calcified native aortic valve stenosis without severe aortic insufficiency and with ejection fraction \> 20% who have been examined by a heart team including an experienced cardiac surgeon and a cardiologist and found to be operative candidates for aortic valve replacement but who have a Society of Thoracic Surgeons operative risk score 8% or are judged by the heart team to be at a 15% risk of mortality for surgical aortic valve replacement.

SAPIEN XT (Transfemoral or Transapical only)
3. in patients with symptomatic heart disease due to severe native calcific aortic stenosis (aortic valve area ≤ 1.0 cm2 or aortic valve area index ≤ 0.6 cm2/m2, a mean aortic valve gradient of ≥ 40 mmHg, or a peak aortic-jet velocity of ≥ 4.0 m/s), and with native anatomy appropriate for the 23, 26, or 29 mm valve system, who are judged by a heart team, including a cardiac surgeon, to be at high or greater risk for open surgical therapy (i.e., Society of Thoracic Surgeons operative risk score ≥8% or at a ≥15% risk of mortality at 30 days).
2. Compatible left common carotid artery (6.5 - 10 mm) and brachiocephalic artery (9 - 15 mm) diameters without significant stenosis (\> 70%) as determined by Multi-Slice Computed Tomography (MSCT) scan or equivalent imaging modality
3. The subject and the treating physician agree that the subject will return for all required post-procedure follow-up visit
4. The subject or the subject's legal representative has been informed of the nature of the trial, agrees to its provisions and has provided written informed consent as approved by the IRB of the respective clinical site

Exclusion Criteria

General

1. Vasculature in the right extremity precluding 6Fr sheath radial or brachial access
2. Inadequate circulation to the right extremity as evidenced by signs of artery occlusion (modified Allen's test) or absence of radial/brachial pulse
3. Hemodialysis shunt, graft, or arterio-venous fistula involving the upper extremity vasculature
4. Evidence of an acute myocardial infarction ≤ 1 month before the intended treatment
5. Aortic valve is a congenital unicuspid or bicuspid valve; or is non-calcified
6. Mixed aortic valve disease (aortic stenosis and aortic regurgitation with predominant aortic regurgitation \>3+)
7. Any therapeutic invasive cardiac procedure resulting in a permanent implant that is performed within 30 days of the index procedure (unless part of planned strategy for treatment of concomitant coronary artery disease)
8. Pre-existing prosthetic heart valve in any position, prosthetic ring, or severe (greater than 3+) mitral insufficiency
9. Blood dyscrasias as defined: Leukopenia, acute anemia, thrombocytopenia, history of bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy
10. Hemodynamic instability requiring inotropic support or mechanical heart assistance.
11. Need for emergency surgery for any reason
12. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy with or without obstruction
13. Severe ventricular dysfunction with LVEF ≤20%
14. Echocardiographic evidence of intracardiac or aortic mass, thrombus, or vegetation
15. Symptomatic or asymptomatic severe occlusive carotid disease requiring concomitant CEA/stenting
16. Subject has undergone carotid stenting or carotid endarterectomy within the previous 6 weeks
17. Active peptic ulcer or upper GI bleeding within the prior 3 months
18. A known hypersensitivity or contraindication to aspirin, heparin, ticlopidine, or clopidogrel, or sensitivity to contrast media, which cannot be adequately pre-medicated
19. Recent (within 6 months) CVA or a TIA
20. Renal insufficiency (creatinine \> 3.0 mg/dL or GFR \< 30) and/or renal replacement therapy at the time of screening
21. Life expectancy \< 12 months due to non-cardiac co-morbid conditions
22. Subjects in whom anti-platelet and/or anticoagulant therapy is contraindicated, or who will refuse transfusion
23. Subjects who have active bacterial endocarditis or other active infections
24. Currently participating in an investigational drug or another device study
25. Subjects who have a planned treatment with any other investigational device or procedure during the study follow-up period (90 days)
26. Subject with planned concomitant surgical or transcatheter ablation for Atrial Fibrillation during the study follow-up period (90 days)
27. Any subject with a balloon valvuloplasty (BAV) within 30 days of the procedure

Neurologic
28. Subject had active major psychiatric disease
29. Subject has severe visual, auditory, or learning impairment and who are unable to comprehend English and therefore unable to be consented for the study
30. Subjects with neurodegenerative or other progressive neurological disease or history of significant head trauma followed by persistent neurologic defaults or known structural brain abnormalities

Angiographic
31. Excessive tortuosity in the right radial/brachial/subclavian artery preventing Sentinel System access and insertion
32. Subject whose brachiocephalic or left carotid artery reveals significant stenosis, calcification, ectasia, dissection, or aneurysm at the ostium or within 3 cm of the ostium

Magnetic Resonance Imaging
33. Subject Body Mass Index (BMI) precluding imaging in scanner
34. Contraindications to MRI (subjects with any implantable temporary or permanent pacemaker or defibrillator, metal implants in field of view, metallic fragments, clips, or devices in the brain or eye before TAVR procedure)
35. Planned implantation of a pacemaker or defibrillator implantation after TAVR
36. Claustrophobia
37. Known allergy to gadolinium or contrast agent
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Claret Medical

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Susheel Kodali, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Columbia University

Samir Kapadia, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

The Cleveland Clinic

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Washington Hospital Center

Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States

Site Status

Morton Plant Hospital

Clearwater, Florida, United States

Site Status

Emory University Hospital

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Henry Ford Hospital

Detroit, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Barnes-Jewish Hospital

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Columbia University Medical Center

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Weill Cornell Medical Center

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Cleveland Clinic Foundation

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

UT Houston / Memorial Hermann

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

UVA Advanced Cardiac Valve Center

Charlottesville, Virginia, United States

Site Status

UW Medical Center

Seattle, Washington, United States

Site Status

Herzzentrum Leipzig - Universitatsklinik

Leipzig, , Germany

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Germany

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Kapadia SR, Kodali S, Makkar R, Mehran R, Lazar RM, Zivadinov R, Dwyer MG, Jilaihawi H, Virmani R, Anwaruddin S, Thourani VH, Nazif T, Mangner N, Woitek F, Krishnaswamy A, Mick S, Chakravarty T, Nakamura M, McCabe JM, Satler L, Zajarias A, Szeto WY, Svensson L, Alu MC, White RM, Kraemer C, Parhizgar A, Leon MB, Linke A; SENTINEL Trial Investigators. Protection Against Cerebral Embolism During Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Jan 31;69(4):367-377. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.10.023. Epub 2016 Nov 1.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 27815101 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CP-10836

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

The SENTRY Clinical Study
NCT01975090 COMPLETED NA
The PROTEMBO SF Trial
NCT03325283 COMPLETED NA
GORE Embolic Protection With Reverse Flow
NCT00594100 COMPLETED PHASE3
RevCore for In Stent Thrombosis
NCT06394739 RECRUITING