The Effect of Two Different Intra-abdominal Pressure Applications on "Mechanical Power" in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

NCT ID: NCT05859906

Last Updated: 2023-05-16

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Total Enrollment

200 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-05-15

Study Completion Date

2023-10-15

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

In laparoscopic surgeries; a trocar is inserted through a small incision and an intervention is made into the peritoneal cavity. Approximately 3-4 liters of carbon dioxide (CO2) insufflation (inflating the abdominal cavity with carbon dioxide gas) is applied and the intra-abdominal pressure is adjusted to 10-20 mmHg. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy operation is routinely performed with 12 mmHg and 14 mmHg pressures in our operating room, and the preferred pressure value is; It is determined by the surgical team to be the most appropriate value for the patient and the operation. Both pressure values applied to the patients intraoperatively are within safe ranges.

The mechanical power of ventilation (MP) is the amount of energy transferred per unit time from the mechanical ventilator to the respiratory system. Although this energy is mainly used to overcome airway resistance, some of it directly affects the lung tissue, potentially causing ventilator induced lung injury (VILI). To prevent ventilator-associated lung injury, it requires the mechanical ventilator to be adjusted so that the least amount of energy is transferred to the respiratory system per unit time for each patient. In the results obtained in the published studies; increased mechanical strength has been associated with increased in-hospital mortality, higher hospital stay and higher ICU follow-up requirement.

The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of two different intra-operative intra-abdominal pressure levels applied to patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anesthesia on 'Mechanical Power (MP)'.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

In laparoscopic surgeries; a trocar is inserted through a small incision and an intervention is made into the peritoneal cavity. Approximately 3-4 liters of carbon dioxide (CO2) insufflation (inflating the abdominal cavity with carbon dioxide gas) is applied and the intra-abdominal pressure is adjusted to 10-20 mmHg. Intra-abdominal pressure is continuously measured by pressure monitoring, which is routinely performed during laparoscopic procedures. The applied intra-abdominal pressure is determined by the surgical team and the most optimal value that creates pneumoperitoneum for the patient is preferred. Abdominal compartment syndrome can be seen due to abdominal hypertension at intra-abdominal pressure values above 20 mmHg.

Both pressure values aimed to be applied in this study are applied in laparoscopic cholecystectomy operations and do not cause any harm to the patient and their superiority to each other has not been determined.

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy operation is routinely performed with 12 mmHg or 14 mmHg pressures in our operating room. Both pressure values applied to the patients intraoperatively are within safe ranges.

The mechanical power of ventilation (MP) is the amount of energy transferred per unit time from the mechanical ventilator to the respiratory system. Although this energy is mainly used to overcome airway resistance and respiratory system compliance, some of it directly affects the lung tissue, potentially causing ventilator induced lung injury (VILI).

MP is a summary variable that includes several components, including tidal volume (VT ), peak pressure (Ppeak), driving pressure (Driving Pressure, ΔP), and respiratory rate (RR). These components; requires that the mechanical ventilator be adjusted so that the least amount of energy is transferred to the respiratory system per unit time for each patient in order to prevent ventilator-associated lung injury.

In the researches; a relationship between mechanical power (MP) and complications such as ventilator-associated lung injury (VILI) and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) has been found. The findings suggest that the mechanical force applied to the lungs should be reduced during intraoperative ventilation in patients undergoing major surgery. In adult patients undergoing general anesthesia during major surgical operations, higher patient exposure to ventilation as measured by higher mechanical power; it has been shown that it is associated with an increased risk of postoperative pulmonary complications and acute respiratory failure in the first 7 days of the postoperative period.

In the results obtained in the published studies; increased mechanical strength has been associated with increased in-hospital mortality and higher hospital stay and higher ICU follow-up requirement.

The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of two different intra-operative intra-abdominal pressure levels applied to patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anesthesia on 'Mechanical Power (MP)'.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Ventilator-induced Lung Injury

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_CONTROL

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Group 12 mmHg

All patients in this group will be operated with an insufflation pressure of 12 mmHg during laparoscopic cholecystectomy surgery.

mechanical power measurement

Intervention Type OTHER

Mechanical power values of the patients;

* Before insufflation (baseline value),
* 0 min after insufflation,
* 15th min after insufflation,
* 30 minutes after insufflation,
* 45th minute after insufflation (if insufflation continues),
* 60th minute after insufflation (if insufflation continues),
* Intraoperative after insufflation It will be measured with the following formula in the specified periods. MP = 0.098 x minute ventilation x \[Peak inspiratory pressure - 0.5 x (Plateau pressure - Positive end-expiratory pressure)\]

Group 14 mmHg

All patients in this group will be operated with an insufflation pressure of 14 mmHg during laparoscopic cholecystectomy surgery.

mechanical power measurement

Intervention Type OTHER

Mechanical power values of the patients;

* Before insufflation (baseline value),
* 0 min after insufflation,
* 15th min after insufflation,
* 30 minutes after insufflation,
* 45th minute after insufflation (if insufflation continues),
* 60th minute after insufflation (if insufflation continues),
* Intraoperative after insufflation It will be measured with the following formula in the specified periods. MP = 0.098 x minute ventilation x \[Peak inspiratory pressure - 0.5 x (Plateau pressure - Positive end-expiratory pressure)\]

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

mechanical power measurement

Mechanical power values of the patients;

* Before insufflation (baseline value),
* 0 min after insufflation,
* 15th min after insufflation,
* 30 minutes after insufflation,
* 45th minute after insufflation (if insufflation continues),
* 60th minute after insufflation (if insufflation continues),
* Intraoperative after insufflation It will be measured with the following formula in the specified periods. MP = 0.098 x minute ventilation x \[Peak inspiratory pressure - 0.5 x (Plateau pressure - Positive end-expiratory pressure)\]

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients with ASA 1-2
* The patient's willingness to participate in the study voluntarily

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients with ASA 3-4
* Patients with lung disease such as pneumonia, COPD attack before the operation
* Patients undergoing other surgical procedures or anesthesia technique
* Pregnant patients
* Patients with morbid obesity
* Unstable patients such as uncontrolled hypertension, decompensated heart disease
* The patient's intraoperative intra-abdominal pressure value is operated with a difference from the pressure determined due to optimal surgical conditions or the patient's lungs do not tolerate it, or switching to open surgery (laparotomy) for any reason.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Ayse Ulgey

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Ayse Ulgey

Professor Doctor

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Ayşe Ülgey, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

TC Erciyes University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Ayşe Ülgey

Kayseri, Talas, Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Ayşe Ülgey, MD

Role: CONTACT

05378201751

Gamze Talih, MD

Role: CONTACT

05447604780

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Protti A, Andreis DT, Monti M, Santini A, Sparacino CC, Langer T, Votta E, Gatti S, Lombardi L, Leopardi O, Masson S, Cressoni M, Gattinoni L. Lung stress and strain during mechanical ventilation: any difference between statics and dynamics? Crit Care Med. 2013 Apr;41(4):1046-55. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31827417a6.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23385096 (View on PubMed)

Cressoni M, Gotti M, Chiurazzi C, Massari D, Algieri I, Amini M, Cammaroto A, Brioni M, Montaruli C, Nikolla K, Guanziroli M, Dondossola D, Gatti S, Valerio V, Vergani GL, Pugni P, Cadringher P, Gagliano N, Gattinoni L. Mechanical Power and Development of Ventilator-induced Lung Injury. Anesthesiology. 2016 May;124(5):1100-8. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000001056.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26872367 (View on PubMed)

Gattinoni L, Tonetti T, Cressoni M, Cadringher P, Herrmann P, Moerer O, Protti A, Gotti M, Chiurazzi C, Carlesso E, Chiumello D, Quintel M. Ventilator-related causes of lung injury: the mechanical power. Intensive Care Med. 2016 Oct;42(10):1567-1575. doi: 10.1007/s00134-016-4505-2. Epub 2016 Sep 12.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27620287 (View on PubMed)

Karalapillai D, Weinberg L, Neto A S, Peyton P, Ellard L, Hu R, Pearce B, Tan CO, Story D, O'Donnell M, Hamilton P, Oughton C, Galtieri J, Wilson A, Eastwood G, Bellomo R, Jones DA. Intra-operative ventilator mechanical power as a predictor of postoperative pulmonary complications in surgical patients: A secondary analysis of a randomised clinical trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2022 Jan 1;39(1):67-74. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000001601.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 34560687 (View on PubMed)

Study Documents

Access uploaded study-related documents such as protocols, statistical analysis plans, or lay summaries.

Document Type: Clinical Study Report

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2023/104

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.