Ultrasound-guided Biofeedback for Transversus Abdominus Re-education in Non-specific Low Back Pain Patients
NCT ID: NCT05859425
Last Updated: 2023-05-18
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
23 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-01-15
2023-01-15
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Specific Stabilization Exercise With Ultrasound Feedback For Patient With Recurrent Low Back Pain
NCT02112760
Comparison of Biofeedback Tools to Train the Transversus Abdominis Activation in Healthy Subjects
NCT03543501
Ultrasound Assessment During Exercise
NCT01015846
Respiratory Training in Low Back Pain
NCT04582812
The Effectiveness of Two Different Feedbacks in Core Stabilization Education for Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain
NCT03099941
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Methods: Chronic NSLBP patients are recruited and randomly assigned to an US-guided or control group. The same motor control-based exercise program is applied to both groups. All patients would receive physiotherapy twice per week for 7 weeks. Outcome measures, tested at baseline and post-intervention, include Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), TrA activation level (measured through a pressure biofeedback unit-based developed protocol), seven established motor control tests, Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Analysis of variance utilizing a two-way mixed ANOVA model for dependent measures of two factors (treatment group and time point of measurement) of which only one is repeated (time point of measurement) is performed to determine between- and within-group differences before and after treatment. Additionally, independent samples' t-test and paired samples' t-test are used for differences between and within groups, respectively, as well as χ2 tests for differences on the motor control tests and the TrA activation level procedure across the groups.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
US-guided biofeedback intervention
This group received visual feedback using real-time ultrasound (US) for transversus abdominus (TrA) activation, while performing the exercise programme. US-guided TrA imaging was initially performed with participants in crook lying, with the US head positioned along the lateral abdominal wall with reference points at the lower point of the rib cage (last rib) and the anterior superior iliac spine, on the right side of the person, midway between these two points. The US head was moved until the user (health professional-investigator) had the best possible visualization of the lateral abdominal muscles (external oblique, internal oblique and TrA). During the execution of the exercises, the participants could watch the ultrasound screen along with the therapist's guidance, thus receiving information (US-visual feedback) of their TrA activation.
Real-time rehabilitative ultrasound imaging (RUSI)
Τhe ultrasound equipment used was B-K Μedical Mini Focus 1402 equipped with high frequency linear probe (8670, 5-12MHz) using standard musculoskeletal settings and the software: V 1.01.01.137. Ultrasound gel (AQUASONIC® 100, Parker Inc., Orange, NJ) was used as coupling agent. TrA imaging was initially performed with participants in crook lying, with the US head positioned along the lateral abdominal wall with reference points at the lower point of the rib cage (last rib) and the anterior superior iliac spine, on the right side of the person, midway between these two points. The US head was moved until tester (investigator) had the best possible visualization of the lateral abdominal muscles (external oblique, internal oblique and TrA). During the execution of the exercises, the participants could watch the ultrasound screen along with the therapist's guidance, thus receiving information (US-visual feedback) of their TrA activation
Control (non-US guided) group
The control group received the traditional tactile feedback from the therapist while performing the motor control exercises for TrA activation. Traditionally, assessment of TrA contraction involves palpation of the muscles. The ability to assess TrA through muscle palpation is largely dependent on examiner's skill, as TrA cannot be directly palpated (feedback sensation being limited from internal oblique muscle). To control the activation of the abdominals the therapist placed his hands on the inside of the anterior superior iliac crests (tactile feedback) and instructed the examinee to pull the abdominal wall inward without moving the spine or pelvis (verbal feedback). The same exercise protocol to the experimental group was performed in this (control) group.
Tactile feedback (control intervention)
Palpatory-guided (manual) feedback for TrA activation
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Real-time rehabilitative ultrasound imaging (RUSI)
Τhe ultrasound equipment used was B-K Μedical Mini Focus 1402 equipped with high frequency linear probe (8670, 5-12MHz) using standard musculoskeletal settings and the software: V 1.01.01.137. Ultrasound gel (AQUASONIC® 100, Parker Inc., Orange, NJ) was used as coupling agent. TrA imaging was initially performed with participants in crook lying, with the US head positioned along the lateral abdominal wall with reference points at the lower point of the rib cage (last rib) and the anterior superior iliac spine, on the right side of the person, midway between these two points. The US head was moved until tester (investigator) had the best possible visualization of the lateral abdominal muscles (external oblique, internal oblique and TrA). During the execution of the exercises, the participants could watch the ultrasound screen along with the therapist's guidance, thus receiving information (US-visual feedback) of their TrA activation
Tactile feedback (control intervention)
Palpatory-guided (manual) feedback for TrA activation
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* suffered from NSLBP lasting longer than 12 weeks, producing moderate or severe disability
Exclusion Criteria
* people suffering from systemic diseases
* pregnant women
18 Years
60 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Crete
OTHER
University of Patras
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Evdokia Billis
Professor in Physiotherapy
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Evdokia Billis
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Patras
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Laboratory of Clinical Rehabilitation and Research
Pátrai, Achaia, Greece
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
01
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.