PET/MRI in Predicting the Outcome of Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy With Esophagectomy in Esophageal Cancer Patients
NCT ID: NCT05855291
Last Updated: 2023-05-11
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
43 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2018-01-22
2021-07-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Role of PET/MRI in Predicting the Outcome of Definitive Chemoradiotherapy for Esophageal Cancer Patients
NCT05855278
MR/PET in the Evaluation of Patients With Esophageal Cancer
NCT02547610
PET-CT vs DWI-MRI in Response Evaluation in Esophageal Cancer
NCT02839109
Early Metabolic Response in Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer Undergoing Induction Chemoradiotherapy
NCT01269970
The Predictive Value of CT-PET in Esophageal Cancer
NCT02385604
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Esophageal carcinoma is ranked as the 6th leading cancer in Taiwan. In recent years, the survival of patients with esophageal cancer has been improved by the use of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with esophagectomy. But it is reported that only patients who were responsive to neoadjuvant therapy would have prolonged survival. And accurate clinical or imaging modality parameters for prognostic prediction are still lacking.
Traditionally, clinicians rely on endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and computed tomography (CT) to evaluate the treatment response of esophageal cancer patients. After the neoadjuvant chemotherapy, the accuracy of EUS for assessment of primary tumor or regional nodal sites is reported to be 45-82% or 55-94%, respectively. As for CT, the reported sensitivity is also suboptimal, ranging from 33 to 55%. The specificity is 50-71%. In this regard, 18F-FDG PET/CT has higher sensitivity and specificity of 57-86% and 46-93% than other imaging modalities. But it is still difficult to precisely assess the treatment response depending on these imaging studies.
Functional MRI has been proven to be useful to evaluate treatment responses in various cancers. However, the application of functional MRI in esophageal cancer is limited. One investigator has reported that the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value derived from diffusion MRI (DWI) had the potential to predict the response of esophageal cancer patients. After chemotherapy, the velocity of contrast across the vascular wall was also reported to change substantially in the dynamic contrast MRI (DCE MRI) study.
Integrated PET/MRI has the advantage to perform multiparametric imaging and to assess tumor metabolism (SUV, TLG), ADC, and DCE MRI parameters simultaneously. Recently, PET/MRI has been investigated in several cancers with promising results. In this study, the investigators prospectively explore the role of multiparametric PET/MRI imaging in evaluating the outcome of patients with esophageal cancer.
Material and method:
The study patients receive 18F-FDG PET/MRI before and after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. And the functional imaging parameters on PET/MRI are calculated and correlated with the treatment outcome.
Material and method:
The study patients receive 18F-FDG PET/MRI before and during definitive chemoradiotherapy. And the corresponding functional imaging parameters are calculated and correlated with the treatment outcome.
18F-FDG PET/MRI: PET/MRI is performed on a Biograph mMR (Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany). The PET/MRI system is equipped with 3-T magnetic field strength, total imaging matrix coil technology covering the entire body with multiple integrated radiofrequency surface coils, and a fully functional PET system with avalanche photodiode technology embedded in the magnetic resonance gantry.
Statistical analysis: Overall survival (OS) serves as the main outcome measure. OS is calculated from the date of diagnosis to the date of death or censored at the date of the last follow-up for surviving patients. The cutoff values for the clinical variables and imaging parameters in survival analysis are determined using the log-rank test. Survival curves are plotted using the Kaplan-Meier method. The effect of each individual variable is initially evaluated using univariate analysis. Cox regression models are used to identify the predictors of survival. Two-tailed P values \< 0.05 are considered statistically significant.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Integrated PET/MRI
The study patients receive 18F-FDG PET/MRI before and after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.
PET/MRI
The participants receive 18F-FDG PET/MRI before and after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
PET/MRI
The participants receive 18F-FDG PET/MRI before and after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Willing to receive therapy
3. The ability to provide written informed consent and receive the scheduled scans
Exclusion Criteria
2. A history of other malignancies or concomitant cancers in different anatomical locations
3. Not suitable to receive the PET scan such as serum glucose levels of \> 200 mg/dL or space phobia
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Yin-Kai Chao
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
Taoyuan District, , Taiwan
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Chao YK, Chang CB, Chang YC, Chan SC, Chiu CH, Ng SH, Hsieh JC, Wang JH. Baseline and interim [18F]FDG-PET/MRI to assess treatment response and survival in patients with M0 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma treated by curative-intent therapy. Cancer Imaging. 2023 Nov 6;23(1):109. doi: 10.1186/s40644-023-00630-2.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
MOST 108-2314-B-182A-021
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.