A Patient-Oriented Research Mentoring Program in Tobacco Dependence and Implementation Science Research
NCT ID: NCT05852860
Last Updated: 2026-02-06
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
NA
500 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-12-01
2027-02-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Motivation and Patch Treatment for HIV-positive Smokers
NCT00551720
Improving Tobacco Treatment Rates for Outpatient Cancer Patients Who Smoke
NCT04737031
An Evidence Based Smoking Cessation Program for Persons Living With HIV/AIDS (Project Legacy)
NCT02029612
The Lung Screening, Tobacco and Health Project
NCT03200236
Comparing Smoking Cessation Interventions Among Underserved Patients Referred for Lung Cancer Screening
NCT04798664
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The investigators have shown that clinician willingness to treat patient smoking is related to clinician bias, including their perceived role in treating tobacco, patient culpability, and effectiveness. In 2 studies, the investigators showed that didactic instruction to counter these biases significantly increased clinician willingness to treat patient tobacco use. In a single-arm study, the researchers showed that a message delivered to oncologists through the EMR that addressed omission bias about tobacco treatment improved actual tobacco treatment rates for cancer patients from 0% to 36%. The study team recently completed a pragmatic RCT testing EMR-delivered patient and clinician nudges directed at omission and status quo biases to promote tobacco treatment in oncology (P50 CA244690). With 2,146 cancer patients accrued, a generalized estimating equation in an ITT analysis showed that the clinician nudge led to about a 3-fold increase in tobacco treatment engagement vs. usual care (35.6% vs. 13.5%; OR = 3.36, 95% CI: 2.12-5.32, p \< 0.001). Advanced Practice Practitioners were significantly more likely than physicians to provide tobacco treatment and non-white patients were significantly more likely than white patients to engage in tobacco treatment (p's \< 0.001). These findings were presented at the 15th Annual Conference on the Science of Dissemination and Implementation in Health and a manuscript is in preparation.
While these data show a \>3-fold increase in tobacco treatment rates from the clinician nudge (vs. usual care), the patient nudge did not increase tobacco treatment rates. Notably, however, the investigators in this study did not conduct a discrete choice experiment (DCE) to identify the patient bias to target with the patient nudge and the team relied on the EMR for patient nudge delivery (\~25% of patients are not registered users of the patient portal). Conducting a DCE to identify the bias target and expanding patient nudge delivery to include text messages may affect the impact of the patient nudge in the proposed study.
This study is particularly important because it will generate: 1) implementation strategies informed by behavioral economics and directed at clinicians and patients to increase tobacco use treatment for PWH; 2) optimal EHR-based infrastructure to facilitate tobacco use treatment; and 3) knowledge about which strategies are effective that can be tested more widely. New approaches to increasing tobacco treatment for PWH could lead to benefits at the patient and population levels. Insights from this study could be applied in other clinical settings to increase tobacco treatment, and thus improve patient outcomes in other populations.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
FACTORIAL
PREVENTION
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Usual Care
Clinicians and patients will receive no further interventions beyond usual practice.
No interventions assigned to this group
Clinician Nudge
Clinicians will receive a nudge via a Best Practice Alert within the electronic medical record.
Clinician Nudge
The clinician nudge will use the BPA functionality within the electronic medical record to deliver a message with a defaulted option to refer to the health system's tobacco treatment program. Changing the default to "no referral" will require an explanation using the options provided or by entering free text.
Patient Nudge
Patients will receive a message sent through the patient portal or via text.
Patient Nudge
The patient nudge will deliver a message within 72 hours of a patient's next scheduled clinic visit. The message will be delivered through the Penn patient portal (MyPennMedicine) or by text with security measures for privacy.
Combined Nudge: Clinician and Patient Nudge
Both the clinician nudge and the patient nudge will be used.
Clinician Nudge
The clinician nudge will use the BPA functionality within the electronic medical record to deliver a message with a defaulted option to refer to the health system's tobacco treatment program. Changing the default to "no referral" will require an explanation using the options provided or by entering free text.
Patient Nudge
The patient nudge will deliver a message within 72 hours of a patient's next scheduled clinic visit. The message will be delivered through the Penn patient portal (MyPennMedicine) or by text with security measures for privacy.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Clinician Nudge
The clinician nudge will use the BPA functionality within the electronic medical record to deliver a message with a defaulted option to refer to the health system's tobacco treatment program. Changing the default to "no referral" will require an explanation using the options provided or by entering free text.
Patient Nudge
The patient nudge will deliver a message within 72 hours of a patient's next scheduled clinic visit. The message will be delivered through the Penn patient portal (MyPennMedicine) or by text with security measures for privacy.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
1. Penn Division of Infectious Disease
2. Prescribing authority in Pennsylvania (i.e., physician, nurse practitioner, physician assistant)
3. Clinical oversight of HIV patients for the past six months
4. English-speaking (messages will be in English)
* Patient participants must be diagnosed with HIV and report current tobacco smoking (self-report daily smoking for last 6 months)
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)
NIH
University of Pennsylvania
OTHER
Abramson Cancer Center at Penn Medicine
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Pennsylvania
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
852850
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
UPCC 01023
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.