Home-based FES Training in People With Chronic Stroke

NCT ID: NCT05849532

Last Updated: 2025-09-19

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

30 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-12-10

Study Completion Date

2026-03-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This project will examine the feasibility, safety and effect of home-based functional electrical stimulation (FES) applied to different lower limb muscles in combination with task-specific training on gait, balance and mobility in adults with chronic stroke. 30 individuals with chronic stroke will first undergo initial screening and baseline walking, mobility, balance and strength assessments in the laboratory. After determining their eligibility for the study, they will undergo 12-weeks of home-based FES and task-specific training. Following the initial screening (week 1) and pre-intervention assessment (week 2), participants will be trained in the lab for 6 sessions (week 3-4) for a FES home program and then given a FES home kit (FES device and an android tablet). Participants will then undergo home-training for 2 weeks (week 5-6) followed by mid-training assessment (week 7). Again, participants will undergo 4-weeks of home training (week 8-11) and final assessment at the end of training (week 12).

This project has the following specific aims:

Aim 1: To investigate the feasibility, safety and efficacy of 12-weeks of home-based FES and task-specific training in adults with chronic stroke.

Aim 2: To examine the effect of 12-weeks of home-based FES and task-specific training on mobility, gait and balance (anticipatory and reactive balance) in adults with chronic stroke.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

BACKGROUND/SCIENTIFIC RATIONALE: Functional impairment after a stroke often includes slowed gait velocity and increased fall risk attributed to foot drop (the inability to dorsiflex the ankle during the swing phase of gait) and lower limb muscle weakness. Damage in the motor cortex or corticospinal tract often results in significant, persistent distal muscle weakness including the sensorimotor control of the ankle joint, typically because of a combination of weakness of the agonist ankle dorsiflexor muscles and spasticity of the antagonist plantarflexor muscle. This results in slower and abnormal gait which leads to gait compensation strategies such as hip hitching, excess circumduction during gait, reduced foot clearance, and high energy expenditure, all of which are factors which could increase the risk of falls in individuals with stroke.

Electrical stimulation, particularly functional electrical stimulation (FES), has become widely used in the field of rehabilitation. FES is defined as the electrical stimulation of muscles that have impaired motor control to produce a contraction to obtain a functionally useful movement. In the last few years, FES systems have been used as neuroprosthetic devices in rehabilitative interventions such as gait training. Stimulator triggers, implemented to control stimulation delivery, range from open-to closed-loop controllers. Finite-state controllers trigger stimulators when specific conditions are met and utilize preset sequences of stimulation. Thus, wearable sensors provide the necessary input to differentiate gait phases during walking and trigger stimulation to specific muscles. This technology has been largely used to improve gait and balance parameters in people with chronic stroke.

Home-based rehabilitation is a powerful option to increase frequency of exercises, therapy adherence, amount of training per week, and self-confidence. Home-exercise using FES is an option which can help reduce the sequelae of sensorimotor disorders and lends itself as an exciting way for people suffering from various conditions to exercise their muscles. Additionally, it has been well described that extending the use of home-based FES to elderly could increase its impact and beneficiate this population significantly.

One of the most complex issues to wider adoption of FES is its ease of use in the home context. There is a marked difference in the use of a technological and medical device in laboratory or clinical facilities compared to home or other more ecological environments. Software able to include easy training programs based on well-established therapeutic protocols may reduce this gap between laboratory and ecological environments and benefit the use of technological medical devices such as FES. A FES system would allow the participant to easily adjust the type and location of their exercise on a daily basis. On the other hand, any device with currents as low as those used by a FES system should be safe to use in any context, and especially in an unsupervised setting.

Most of the tele rehabilitation platforms lack a medium to provide external physical assistance. Incorporating an actuation modality such as FES or other technological devices at the patient's end, which mimics a therapist in a remote clinic, may be effective for therapeutic purposes until the patient's recovery is maximized. Although a robot-guided rehabilitation intervention or online supervision by the therapist could be a feasible option, it might be more therapeutically beneficial to include FES. This is a treatment where a skeletal muscle can be activated by passing low-level electric currents across the motor neurons. This treatment can be administered by applying transcutaneous electrodes over the surface of the skin. The reason why FES is helpful is because it can strengthen muscle, prevent muscle atrophy, and increase bone density. Moreover, FES has neuroplastic effects as it helps to retrain active motor units and rebuild the weak connections between the brain and the motor neurons. Hence, the inclusion of FES to telerehabilitation programs could increase the efficacy of the therapy and contribute to the recovery process of persons with partial or complete loss of limb function. This project aims to determine whether home-based use of a platform that enables FES exercises is safe and beneficial to individuals with chronic stroke. It also aims to see if 8-weeks of home-based FES and task-specific training can result in improvements in spatio-temporal parameters of gait, mobility, balance and general health.

OBJECTIVE/AIMS: The purpose of this study is to examine the feasibility, safety, efficacy and effect of 12 weeks of home-based combined FES and task-specific training program in people with chronic stroke.

Aim 1: To investigate the feasibility, safety and efficacy of 12-weeks of home-based FES and task-specific training in adults with chronic stroke. H1: 12-weeks of home-based FES training program will be safe, feasible and will not result in any adverse events during the training program.

Aim 2: To examine the effect of 12-weeks of home-based FES and task-specific training on gait, mobility and balance in adults with chronic stroke. H2: Post intervention, adults with chronic stroke will demonstrate improvements in spatial and temporal parameters of gait (gait speed, cadence and gait asymmetry), mobility (physical activity and muscle strength) and balance (anticipatory and reactive balance components).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Chronic Stroke

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Single group design to compare the effects of functional electrical stimulation on gait, balance control, physical activity and fall risk in individuals with chronic stroke
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Home-training with functional electrical stimulation

This study employs a single group pre-post design to determine the feasibility, safety and efficacy of a 12-week of home-based combined FES and task-specific training program. Also, this study will test the effect of the same intervention on gait, mobility and balance in adults with chronic stroke.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Functional Electrical Stimulation

Intervention Type DEVICE

12-weeks of training sessions that include initial screening and clinical assessment (Week 1-2), onsite training sessions (Week 3-4), home training sessions (Week 4-8). There will also be pre (Week 1), mid (Week 7) and post-training (Week 12) assessment. Each session will consist of a 10-minute warm-up session with 5-6 stretching exercises. Warm-up will be followed by a 30 minute training session comprising of mobility, balance and walking exercises with FES. This will be followed by a cool down session for 10-minutes comprising of 5-6 muscle stretches. The participant will first watch video of the each exercise on the android tablet and then perform the exercises.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Functional Electrical Stimulation

12-weeks of training sessions that include initial screening and clinical assessment (Week 1-2), onsite training sessions (Week 3-4), home training sessions (Week 4-8). There will also be pre (Week 1), mid (Week 7) and post-training (Week 12) assessment. Each session will consist of a 10-minute warm-up session with 5-6 stretching exercises. Warm-up will be followed by a 30 minute training session comprising of mobility, balance and walking exercises with FES. This will be followed by a cool down session for 10-minutes comprising of 5-6 muscle stretches. The participant will first watch video of the each exercise on the android tablet and then perform the exercises.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Age group: 18-90 years.
2. Presence of unilateral hemiparesis.
3. Onset of stroke (\> 6 months).
4. Ability to walk independently with or without an assistive device for at least 300 ft.
5. Can understand and communicate in English and can verbalize discomfort or pain in English
6. Use of smartphone on a daily basis
7. Availability of internet/Wi-Fi at home

Exclusion Criteria

1. Body weight more than 250 lbs.
2. Heel bone density measurement using an ultrasound device. Individuals classified as osteoporotic (i.e., with a T-score \< -2) will be excluded.
3. Cognitive impairment (Montreal Cognitive assessment score \<26/30)
4. Verbal Aphasia (i.e \<71% score on Mississippi Aphasia Screening)
5. Severe depression (\> 15 points on geriatric depression scale)
6. Any neurological condition other than stroke.
7. Uncontrolled and/or untreated hypertension/hypotension, uncontrolled and/or untreated diabetes and any musculoskeletal, neuromuscular or systemic diagnosis .
8. Recent major surgery (\< 6 months) or hospitalization (\< 3 months).
9. Deep venous thrombosis.
10. Past or current history of any type of active cancer
11. Peripheral nerve injury or neuropathy in the affected limb with motor disability.
12. Uncontrolled high blood pressure/angina.
13. Skin condition not tolerant with FES therapy.
14. Past or current history of uncontrolled/controlled epilepsy or any other types of seizure disorders
15. Botox treatment within the last 5 months.
16. Pacemaker users.

\-
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

90 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Illinois at Chicago

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Tanvi Bhatt

Full Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Tanvi Bhatt, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Illinois at Chicago

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Illinois at Chicago

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Rudri Purohit, MS

Role: CONTACT

312-413-9772

Jessica Pitts, MS

Role: CONTACT

312-355-3642

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Tanvi Bhatt, PhD

Role: primary

312-355-4443

Rudri Purohit, MS

Role: backup

312-413-9772

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2022-0524

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.