Trial to Assess Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Asian Americans With Type 2 Diabetes
NCT ID: NCT05826678
Last Updated: 2024-03-15
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
30 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-09-22
2024-05-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
1. Check if continuous glucose monitoring is doable and consistent for this group, and see how it affects their quality of life.
2. Estimate how well the health outcomes (glucose and lipid markers) vary over the study period.
3. Understand how social and community factors can impact the use of continuous glucose monitors in this group.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Use of Continuous Glucose Monitors in Publicly-Insured Youth With Type 2 Diabetes - A Pilot and Feasibility Study
NCT05074667
The Effectiveness of Flash Glucose Monitoring System on Glycemic Control in Patients With New-onset Type 2 Diabetes
NCT04535830
Effect of Continuous Glucose Monitoring System on Glycemic Control in Non-insulin-Treated Elderly People With Type 2 Diabetes
NCT07007676
Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes
NCT00529815
Effects of Novel Flash Glucose Monitoring System on Glycemic Control in Adult Patients With Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus
NCT03522870
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
1. Higher unawareness rate: A major contributor to higher T2D unawareness among AAs is the significant difference in BMI-associated T2D risk among AAs (24-25 kg/m2) compared with non-Asians (29-30 kg/m2). Until the "Screen at 23" campaign (See "Innovation"), no national agency would recognize and recommend that AAs be screened for T2D at lower BMIs of 23-25 kg/m2. Furthermore, NHANES data has shown that while age- and sex-adjusted diabetes prevalence among AAs is 19%, the breakdown of this figure may not be truly reflective of the actual prevalence among the disaggregated AA subgroups, which showed a wide variation with South Asians at 23%, Southeast Asians at 22%, and East Asians (including Chinese, Koreans and Japanese) at 14%, the last one being comparable to a recent report from China which showed diabetes prevalence of 11.2%.
2. Cultural and language barriers: AAs living in the US have the highest rates (35%) of limited English proficiency. This figure is even higher at 44% for foreign-born ChA. Limited English proficiency is closely linked to reduced health access, poor health outcomes and lower utilization rates of health technologies.
3. Model minority myth: Hurdles to health care have been significantly exacerbated by the exponential rise in anti-Asian sentiments during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Rapidly advancing diabetes technologies, especially CGM, can achieve better metabolic targets, lower diabetes-related complications, and provide a better quality of life, which have been reported for other ethnic groups but not for AAs due to the systemic exclusion of AAs from CGM studies. Multiple systemic barriers exist for AA to access CGMs, including costs and lack of data to justify reimbursement, provider inertia, and lack of advocacy and vocalization of needs, on top of limited English proficiency and lack of culturally-tailored education. These barriers are in addition to a lack of "Digital Literacy", the new "super social determinant of health", which will increase disparities between those who have skills and access to digital tools and those who do not. In this proposal, we will evaluate the impact, barriers and facilitators of CGM use and adherence in AAs (1st generation ChA) with T2D.
In this 6-month clinical trial, we will examine the impact of CGM use vs. No CGM among 1st generation ChA with T2D.The aim will be to:
1. Evaluate feasibility (adherence and consistency) and quality of life measures during CGM use in this population.
2. Generate precision estimates of the distribution of the secondary outcomes (6-month glycemic control and lipid markers) in both arms to inform a future randomized controlled trial (RCT).
3: Identify multi-level barriers and facilitators of CGM use for ChA with T2D, using a socioecological framework (patient-level, provider-level, and community/environment level). We aim to comprehensively evaluate the implementation process (facilitators and impediments), resource requirements, and intermediate patient adherence outcomes for the program using mixed-methods approaches. These will inform the design of culturally-tailored interventions for larger RCT.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Participants on CGM
Participants in this group will be offered a CGM device for glucose monitoring, with training and educational materials provided in either English or Chinese, according to the participant's preference.
Continuous Glucose Monitor
The Clinical Diabetes Educator (CDE) will follow up with the participants at Month 1 after the baseline study visit, at the study midpoint (Month 3), and at the end of the study (Month 6) to check CGM usage, including timely calibration and change adherence. At the end of the study, participants will be invited to complete a survey and participate in virtual interviews to assess changes in their health behaviors and the acceptability of CGM devices.
Participants on Finger-stick only
Participants in this group continue standard fingerstick self-monitoring of blood glucose (FSGM) as per standard care protocol. They will also receive educational materials provided in either English or Chinese, according to the participant's preference.
Finger stick glucose monitoring
Participants will adhere to the standard care protocol and continue self-monitoring of blood glucose through fingersticks as per usual practice\[46\]. The Clinical Diabetes Educator (CDE) will monitor and provide follow-up to the control group participants as per the same schedule followed for the intervention group.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Continuous Glucose Monitor
The Clinical Diabetes Educator (CDE) will follow up with the participants at Month 1 after the baseline study visit, at the study midpoint (Month 3), and at the end of the study (Month 6) to check CGM usage, including timely calibration and change adherence. At the end of the study, participants will be invited to complete a survey and participate in virtual interviews to assess changes in their health behaviors and the acceptability of CGM devices.
Finger stick glucose monitoring
Participants will adhere to the standard care protocol and continue self-monitoring of blood glucose through fingersticks as per usual practice\[46\]. The Clinical Diabetes Educator (CDE) will monitor and provide follow-up to the control group participants as per the same schedule followed for the intervention group.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* CGM-naïve
* HbA1c \>7.5% within 3 months of study commencement.
* Participants should also possess a smartphone, as this is needed in order to facilitate the collection of CGM data by the study team as well as homogenize CGM usage education.
Exclusion Criteria
* Not fluent in either English or Chinese
* Currently undergoing or planning to undergo diathermy or high-frequency heat treatments in whom CGM use may be contraindicated
* Inability to travel due to frailty or health reasons
* Lack of internet access
* Critically ill populations, including those on dialysis
* Vulnerable populations (prisoners and women who are pregnant or planning to be pregnant during the time of study)
40 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Joslin Diabetes Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
George King, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Joslin Diabetes Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Joslin Diabetes Center
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
STUDY00000206
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.