Quantitative Detection Efficiency of UDFF for Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

NCT ID: NCT05802199

Last Updated: 2023-04-10

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Total Enrollment

300 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-01-01

Study Completion Date

2023-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the most common chronic liver disease worldwide, affecting more than 25 % of the population globally. Approximately 20 % - 25 % of NAFLD patients can develop nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), which leads to more rapid progression from fibrosis to cirrhosis, and even liver failure or hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Early detection and treatment may halt or reverse NAFLD progression.

Although liver biopsy has been the well-accepted clinical reference standard for both diagnosis and staging of the different histological changes in NAFLD, this procedure is invasive with complications such as bleeding and infection, and is unreliable for quantifying steatosis due to sampling errors. Magnetic resonance imaging-derived proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF) currently has been accepted as the preferred alternative to the histological assessment of hepatic steatosis in patients with NAFLD. Magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) provide additional information of inflammation and fibrotic components of NAFLD. However, important limitations hinder the widespread clinical application of MRI, including high cost, low availability, long scan times and exclusion of patients with metal implants.

Ultrasound (US) has been recommended by several guidelines as the first-line screening tool for patients at risk of NAFLD. The developed ultrasound-derived fat fraction (UDFF) is designed to assess hepatic steatosis by estimating the frequency-dependent attenuation coefficient (AC) and backscatter coefficient (BSC) through processing acoustic radiofrequency (RF) signals returned from the liver tissue as fat vesicles in hepatocytes have a different characteristic impedance compared to normal liver tissue. UDFF is available on the Acuson Sequoia ultrasound system (Simens Healthineers, Mountain View, CA, USA), with reference to integrated phantom data to correct for system impact, and produces a UDFF value presented as a fat fraction (%), which is potentially related to MRI-PDFF and can be directly compared with MRI-PDFF. In addition, automatic point shear wave elastography (auto-pSWE) is available on the Acuson Sequoia ultrasound system to obtain liver stiffness measurement (LSM) for assessing hepatic fibrosis, simultaneously with UDFF measurement. The prospective, multicenter study aims to evaluate the efficiency of UDFF as a quantitative non-invasive alternative for NAFLD.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the most common chronic liver disease worldwide characterized by excessive accumulation of triglycerides in hepatocytes and subsequent steatosis, affecting more than 25 % of the population globally. Approximately 20 % - 25 % of NAFLD patients can develop nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), which leads to more rapid progression from fibrosis to cirrhosis, and even liver failure or hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). NALFD is strongly associated with metabolic risk factors, such as obesity, cardiovascular disease, and diabetes mellitus. Early detection and treatment may halt or reverse NAFLD progression. However, the occurrence and progression of steatosis and fibrosis had no obvious clinical symptoms, resulting in a difficulty of early diagnose and grade individuals with NAFLD clinically.

Although liver biopsy has been the well-accepted clinical reference standard for both diagnosis and staging of the different histological changes in NAFLD, this procedure is invasive with complications such as bleeding and infection, and is unreliable for quantifying steatosis due to sampling errors. Several imaging modalities have been used to diagnose and grade hepatic steatosis. Magnetic resonance imaging-derived proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF) currently has been accepted as the preferred alternative to the histological assessment of hepatic steatosis in patients with NAFLD. Magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) provide additional information of inflammation and fibrotic components of NAFLD. However, important limitations hinder the widespread clinical application of MRI, including high cost, low availability, long scan times and exclusion of patients with metal implants.

Ultrasound (US) has been recommended by several guidelines as the first-line screening tool for patients at risk of NAFLD. The most commonly used noninvasive method that quantifies the amount of fat in the liver is the controlled attenuation parameter, and more than 10% of steatosis can be distinguished. The disadvantages of this technique are that the liver morphological changes cannot be assessed simultaneously and poor performance in patients with higher body mass indices, leading to a failure rate of measurement ranged of 7.7 % - 14.0 %.

The developed ultrasound-derived fat fraction (UDFF) is designed to assess hepatic steatosis by estimating the frequency-dependent attenuation coefficient (AC) and backscatter coefficient (BSC) through processing acoustic radiofrequency (RF) signals returned from the liver tissue as fat vesicles in hepatocytes have a different characteristic impedance compared to normal liver tissue. UDFF is available on the Acuson Sequoia ultrasound system (Simens Healthineers, Mountain View, CA, USA), with reference to integrated phantom data to correct for system impact, and produces a UDFF value presented as a fat fraction (%), which is potentially related to MRI-PDFF and can be directly compared with MRI-PDFF. In addition, automatic point shear wave elastography (auto-pSWE) is available on the Acuson Sequoia ultrasound system to obtain liver stiffness measurement (LSM) for assessing hepatic fibrosis, simultaneously with UDFF measurement. The prospective, multicenter study aims to evaluate the efficiency of UDFF as a quantitative non-invasive alternative for NAFLD.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Training cohort

Patients were fulfilled diagnosis of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease based on radiological and clinical manifestation.

Patients were fulfilled diagnosis of hepatic fibrosis based on radiological and clinical manifestation.

Hepatic fat fraction and hepatic fibrosis

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

All patients underwent measurement of UDFF for hepatic fat fraction and auto-pSWE for hepatic fibrosis.

All patients underwent measurement of MRI-PDFF for hepatic fat fraction and MRE for hepatic fibrosis as reference standard.

Validation cohort

Patients were fulfilled diagnosis of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease based on radiological and clinical manifestation.

Patients were fulfilled diagnosis of hepatic fibrosis based on radiological and clinical manifestation.

Hepatic fat fraction and hepatic fibrosis

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

All patients underwent measurement of UDFF for hepatic fat fraction and auto-pSWE for hepatic fibrosis.

All patients underwent measurement of MRI-PDFF for hepatic fat fraction and MRE for hepatic fibrosis as reference standard.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Hepatic fat fraction and hepatic fibrosis

All patients underwent measurement of UDFF for hepatic fat fraction and auto-pSWE for hepatic fibrosis.

All patients underwent measurement of MRI-PDFF for hepatic fat fraction and MRE for hepatic fibrosis as reference standard.

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. be at least 18 years of age.
2. fulfilled diagnosis of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease based on radiological (MRI-PDFF values \> 5%) and clinical manifestation.
3. fulfilled diagnosis of hepatic fibrosis with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease based on radiological (LSM by MRE \> 3.02kPa) and clinical manifestation.
4. Willing to participate in this research and sign the informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria

1. with liver dysfunction at the terminal stage or are ready for liver transplantation.
2. with viral hepatitis, autoimmune hepatitis, and alpha-1-antitrypsin deficiency.
3. history of excessive drinking (the amount of alcohol consumed by women is more than 140 grams per week, and that of men is more than 210 grams per week).
4. unable to cooperate with ultrasound examinations.
5. have taken liver damage drugs within the past six months.
6. with massive ascites.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Zhongda Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Zhejiang University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Lishui Country People's Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Shandong Public Health Clinical Center

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role collaborator

Affiliated Hangzhou Xixi Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

The Second Hospital of Anhui Medical University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

The People's Hospital of Bozhou

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

The First Hospital of Jilin University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Kliniken Hirslanden Beau Site, Salem und Permancence

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Third People's Hospital of Zhenjiang, Jiangsu University

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jiangao Fan, M.D.

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine

Xiaolong Qi, M.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Zhongda Hospital

Yi Dong, M.D.

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

The People's Hospital of Bozhou

Bozhou, Anhui, China

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

The Second Hospital of Anhui Medical University

Hefei, Anhui, China

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University

Xiamen, Fujian, China

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Zhongda Hospital, Southeast University

Nanjing, Jiangsu, China

Site Status RECRUITING

Jiangsu Province Hospital

Nanjing, Jiangsu, China

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Zhe Third People's Hospital of Zhenjiang

Zhenjiang, Jiangsu, China

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

The First Bethune Hospital of Jilin University

Changchun, Jilin, China

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Shandong Public Health Clinical Center

Jinan, Shandong, China

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine

Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China

Site Status RECRUITING

Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine

Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Affiliated Hangzhou Xixi Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine

Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Lishui People's Hospital

Lishui, Zhejiang, China

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University

Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Kliniken Hirslanden Beau Site, Salem und Permancence

Bern, Canton of Bern, Switzerland

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China Switzerland

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Xiaolong Qi, M.D.

Role: CONTACT

+8618588602600

Yunlin Huang, M.D.

Role: CONTACT

+8613616713631

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Zhou Wang, M.D.

Role: primary

Fan Jiang, M.D.

Role: primary

Xiaodong Zhang, M.D.

Role: primary

Jia Li, M.D.

Role: primary

Chuanlong Zhu, M.D.

Role: primary

Yumei Yin, M.D.

Role: primary

Xiaofeng Sun, M.D.

Role: primary

Rong Shan, M.D.

Role: primary

Yi Dong, M.D.

Role: primary

Lingyun Bao, M.D.

Role: primary

Jiansong Gao, M.D.

Role: primary

Jianming Lei, M.D.

Role: primary

Shihao Xu, M.D.

Role: primary

Christoph F Dietrich, M.D.

Role: primary

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Ferraioli G, Berzigotti A, Barr RG, Choi BI, Cui XW, Dong Y, Gilja OH, Lee JY, Lee DH, Moriyasu F, Piscaglia F, Sugimoto K, Wong GL, Wong VW, Dietrich CF. Quantification of Liver Fat Content with Ultrasound: A WFUMB Position Paper. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2021 Oct;47(10):2803-2820. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2021.06.002. Epub 2021 Jul 18.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 34284932 (View on PubMed)

Sanyal AJ, Brunt EM, Kleiner DE, Kowdley KV, Chalasani N, Lavine JE, Ratziu V, McCullough A. Endpoints and clinical trial design for nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Hepatology. 2011 Jul;54(1):344-53. doi: 10.1002/hep.24376.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 21520200 (View on PubMed)

Simon TG, Roelstraete B, Khalili H, Hagstrom H, Ludvigsson JF. Mortality in biopsy-confirmed nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: results from a nationwide cohort. Gut. 2021 Jul;70(7):1375-1382. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2020-322786. Epub 2020 Oct 9.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 33037056 (View on PubMed)

Zhang MH, Li J, Zhu XY, Zhang YQ, Ye ST, Leng YR, Yang T, Zhang H, Kong LY. Physalin B ameliorates nonalcoholic steatohepatitis by stimulating autophagy and NRF2 activation mediated improvement in oxidative stress. Free Radic Biol Med. 2021 Feb 20;164:1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2020.12.020. Epub 2021 Jan 1.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 33388433 (View on PubMed)

Chitturi S, Farrell GC, Hashimoto E, Saibara T, Lau GK, Sollano JD; Asia-Pacific Working Party on NAFLD. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in the Asia-Pacific region: definitions and overview of proposed guidelines. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007 Jun;22(6):778-87. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2007.05001.x.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 17565630 (View on PubMed)

European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL); European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD); European Association for the Study of Obesity (EASO). EASL-EASD-EASO Clinical Practice Guidelines for the management of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Diabetologia. 2016 Jun;59(6):1121-40. doi: 10.1007/s00125-016-3902-y. No abstract available.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 27053230 (View on PubMed)

Kim SH, Lee JM, Kim JH, Kim KG, Han JK, Lee KH, Park SH, Yi NJ, Suh KS, An SK, Kim YJ, Son KR, Lee HS, Choi BI. Appropriateness of a donor liver with respect to macrosteatosis: application of artificial neural networks to US images--initial experience. Radiology. 2005 Mar;234(3):793-803. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2343040142. Epub 2005 Jan 21.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 15665225 (View on PubMed)

Hernaez R, Lazo M, Bonekamp S, Kamel I, Brancati FL, Guallar E, Clark JM. Diagnostic accuracy and reliability of ultrasonography for the detection of fatty liver: a meta-analysis. Hepatology. 2011 Sep 2;54(3):1082-1090. doi: 10.1002/hep.24452.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 21618575 (View on PubMed)

Dasarathy S, Dasarathy J, Khiyami A, Joseph R, Lopez R, McCullough AJ. Validity of real time ultrasound in the diagnosis of hepatic steatosis: a prospective study. J Hepatol. 2009 Dec;51(6):1061-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2009.09.001. Epub 2009 Sep 20.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 19846234 (View on PubMed)

Marshall RH, Eissa M, Bluth EI, Gulotta PM, Davis NK. Hepatorenal index as an accurate, simple, and effective tool in screening for steatosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012 Nov;199(5):997-1002. doi: 10.2214/AJR.11.6677.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 23096171 (View on PubMed)

Webb M, Yeshua H, Zelber-Sagi S, Santo E, Brazowski E, Halpern Z, Oren R. Diagnostic value of a computerized hepatorenal index for sonographic quantification of liver steatosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009 Apr;192(4):909-14. doi: 10.2214/AJR.07.4016.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 19304694 (View on PubMed)

Labyed Y, Milkowski A. Novel Method for Ultrasound-Derived Fat Fraction Using an Integrated Phantom. J Ultrasound Med. 2020 Dec;39(12):2427-2438. doi: 10.1002/jum.15364. Epub 2020 Jun 11.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 32525261 (View on PubMed)

Gao J, Wong C, Maar M, Park D. Reliability of performing ultrasound derived SWE and fat fraction in adult livers. Clin Imaging. 2021 Dec;80:424-429. doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2021.08.025. Epub 2021 Sep 17.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 34543866 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CHESS2303

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

NAFLD Study: US vs Liver Biopsy
NCT04101162 UNKNOWN NA