Quantitative Detection Efficiency of UDFF for Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease
NCT ID: NCT05802199
Last Updated: 2023-04-10
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
300 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2023-01-01
2023-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Although liver biopsy has been the well-accepted clinical reference standard for both diagnosis and staging of the different histological changes in NAFLD, this procedure is invasive with complications such as bleeding and infection, and is unreliable for quantifying steatosis due to sampling errors. Magnetic resonance imaging-derived proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF) currently has been accepted as the preferred alternative to the histological assessment of hepatic steatosis in patients with NAFLD. Magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) provide additional information of inflammation and fibrotic components of NAFLD. However, important limitations hinder the widespread clinical application of MRI, including high cost, low availability, long scan times and exclusion of patients with metal implants.
Ultrasound (US) has been recommended by several guidelines as the first-line screening tool for patients at risk of NAFLD. The developed ultrasound-derived fat fraction (UDFF) is designed to assess hepatic steatosis by estimating the frequency-dependent attenuation coefficient (AC) and backscatter coefficient (BSC) through processing acoustic radiofrequency (RF) signals returned from the liver tissue as fat vesicles in hepatocytes have a different characteristic impedance compared to normal liver tissue. UDFF is available on the Acuson Sequoia ultrasound system (Simens Healthineers, Mountain View, CA, USA), with reference to integrated phantom data to correct for system impact, and produces a UDFF value presented as a fat fraction (%), which is potentially related to MRI-PDFF and can be directly compared with MRI-PDFF. In addition, automatic point shear wave elastography (auto-pSWE) is available on the Acuson Sequoia ultrasound system to obtain liver stiffness measurement (LSM) for assessing hepatic fibrosis, simultaneously with UDFF measurement. The prospective, multicenter study aims to evaluate the efficiency of UDFF as a quantitative non-invasive alternative for NAFLD.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Quantitative US for Evaluation of Hepatic Steatosis in MAFLD With UDFF
NCT06097338
A Clinical Study of Ultrasound-derived Fat Fraction to Assess Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease
NCT06487325
Quantification of Hepatic Steatosis With Different Ultrasound Frequency
NCT05855239
Usefulness of Ultrasound-derived Fat Fraction for Quantification of Hepatic Steatosis in Patients Suspected of MASLD
NCT06662851
Exploratory Analysis of Enhanced Liver Function (ELF) Test to Detect Early Fatty Liver in High Risk Population
NCT06225193
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Although liver biopsy has been the well-accepted clinical reference standard for both diagnosis and staging of the different histological changes in NAFLD, this procedure is invasive with complications such as bleeding and infection, and is unreliable for quantifying steatosis due to sampling errors. Several imaging modalities have been used to diagnose and grade hepatic steatosis. Magnetic resonance imaging-derived proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF) currently has been accepted as the preferred alternative to the histological assessment of hepatic steatosis in patients with NAFLD. Magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) provide additional information of inflammation and fibrotic components of NAFLD. However, important limitations hinder the widespread clinical application of MRI, including high cost, low availability, long scan times and exclusion of patients with metal implants.
Ultrasound (US) has been recommended by several guidelines as the first-line screening tool for patients at risk of NAFLD. The most commonly used noninvasive method that quantifies the amount of fat in the liver is the controlled attenuation parameter, and more than 10% of steatosis can be distinguished. The disadvantages of this technique are that the liver morphological changes cannot be assessed simultaneously and poor performance in patients with higher body mass indices, leading to a failure rate of measurement ranged of 7.7 % - 14.0 %.
The developed ultrasound-derived fat fraction (UDFF) is designed to assess hepatic steatosis by estimating the frequency-dependent attenuation coefficient (AC) and backscatter coefficient (BSC) through processing acoustic radiofrequency (RF) signals returned from the liver tissue as fat vesicles in hepatocytes have a different characteristic impedance compared to normal liver tissue. UDFF is available on the Acuson Sequoia ultrasound system (Simens Healthineers, Mountain View, CA, USA), with reference to integrated phantom data to correct for system impact, and produces a UDFF value presented as a fat fraction (%), which is potentially related to MRI-PDFF and can be directly compared with MRI-PDFF. In addition, automatic point shear wave elastography (auto-pSWE) is available on the Acuson Sequoia ultrasound system to obtain liver stiffness measurement (LSM) for assessing hepatic fibrosis, simultaneously with UDFF measurement. The prospective, multicenter study aims to evaluate the efficiency of UDFF as a quantitative non-invasive alternative for NAFLD.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Training cohort
Patients were fulfilled diagnosis of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease based on radiological and clinical manifestation.
Patients were fulfilled diagnosis of hepatic fibrosis based on radiological and clinical manifestation.
Hepatic fat fraction and hepatic fibrosis
All patients underwent measurement of UDFF for hepatic fat fraction and auto-pSWE for hepatic fibrosis.
All patients underwent measurement of MRI-PDFF for hepatic fat fraction and MRE for hepatic fibrosis as reference standard.
Validation cohort
Patients were fulfilled diagnosis of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease based on radiological and clinical manifestation.
Patients were fulfilled diagnosis of hepatic fibrosis based on radiological and clinical manifestation.
Hepatic fat fraction and hepatic fibrosis
All patients underwent measurement of UDFF for hepatic fat fraction and auto-pSWE for hepatic fibrosis.
All patients underwent measurement of MRI-PDFF for hepatic fat fraction and MRE for hepatic fibrosis as reference standard.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Hepatic fat fraction and hepatic fibrosis
All patients underwent measurement of UDFF for hepatic fat fraction and auto-pSWE for hepatic fibrosis.
All patients underwent measurement of MRI-PDFF for hepatic fat fraction and MRE for hepatic fibrosis as reference standard.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. fulfilled diagnosis of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease based on radiological (MRI-PDFF values \> 5%) and clinical manifestation.
3. fulfilled diagnosis of hepatic fibrosis with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease based on radiological (LSM by MRE \> 3.02kPa) and clinical manifestation.
4. Willing to participate in this research and sign the informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria
2. with viral hepatitis, autoimmune hepatitis, and alpha-1-antitrypsin deficiency.
3. history of excessive drinking (the amount of alcohol consumed by women is more than 140 grams per week, and that of men is more than 210 grams per week).
4. unable to cooperate with ultrasound examinations.
5. have taken liver damage drugs within the past six months.
6. with massive ascites.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Zhongda Hospital
OTHER
Zhejiang University
OTHER
Lishui Country People's Hospital
OTHER
Shandong Public Health Clinical Center
OTHER_GOV
Affiliated Hangzhou Xixi Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine
UNKNOWN
First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University
OTHER
The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University
OTHER
The Second Hospital of Anhui Medical University
OTHER
The People's Hospital of Bozhou
UNKNOWN
The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University
OTHER
The First Hospital of Jilin University
OTHER
Kliniken Hirslanden Beau Site, Salem und Permancence
UNKNOWN
Third People's Hospital of Zhenjiang, Jiangsu University
UNKNOWN
Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jiangao Fan, M.D.
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine
Xiaolong Qi, M.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Zhongda Hospital
Yi Dong, M.D.
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
The People's Hospital of Bozhou
Bozhou, Anhui, China
The Second Hospital of Anhui Medical University
Hefei, Anhui, China
The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University
Xiamen, Fujian, China
Zhongda Hospital, Southeast University
Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
Jiangsu Province Hospital
Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
Zhe Third People's Hospital of Zhenjiang
Zhenjiang, Jiangsu, China
The First Bethune Hospital of Jilin University
Changchun, Jilin, China
Shandong Public Health Clinical Center
Jinan, Shandong, China
Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China
Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
Affiliated Hangzhou Xixi Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
Lishui People's Hospital
Lishui, Zhejiang, China
The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University
Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China
Kliniken Hirslanden Beau Site, Salem und Permancence
Bern, Canton of Bern, Switzerland
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Zhou Wang, M.D.
Role: primary
Fan Jiang, M.D.
Role: primary
Xiaodong Zhang, M.D.
Role: primary
Jia Li, M.D.
Role: primary
Chuanlong Zhu, M.D.
Role: primary
Yumei Yin, M.D.
Role: primary
Xiaofeng Sun, M.D.
Role: primary
Rong Shan, M.D.
Role: primary
Yi Dong, M.D.
Role: primary
Lingyun Bao, M.D.
Role: primary
Jiansong Gao, M.D.
Role: primary
Jianming Lei, M.D.
Role: primary
Shihao Xu, M.D.
Role: primary
Christoph F Dietrich, M.D.
Role: primary
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Ferraioli G, Berzigotti A, Barr RG, Choi BI, Cui XW, Dong Y, Gilja OH, Lee JY, Lee DH, Moriyasu F, Piscaglia F, Sugimoto K, Wong GL, Wong VW, Dietrich CF. Quantification of Liver Fat Content with Ultrasound: A WFUMB Position Paper. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2021 Oct;47(10):2803-2820. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2021.06.002. Epub 2021 Jul 18.
Sanyal AJ, Brunt EM, Kleiner DE, Kowdley KV, Chalasani N, Lavine JE, Ratziu V, McCullough A. Endpoints and clinical trial design for nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Hepatology. 2011 Jul;54(1):344-53. doi: 10.1002/hep.24376.
Simon TG, Roelstraete B, Khalili H, Hagstrom H, Ludvigsson JF. Mortality in biopsy-confirmed nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: results from a nationwide cohort. Gut. 2021 Jul;70(7):1375-1382. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2020-322786. Epub 2020 Oct 9.
Zhang MH, Li J, Zhu XY, Zhang YQ, Ye ST, Leng YR, Yang T, Zhang H, Kong LY. Physalin B ameliorates nonalcoholic steatohepatitis by stimulating autophagy and NRF2 activation mediated improvement in oxidative stress. Free Radic Biol Med. 2021 Feb 20;164:1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2020.12.020. Epub 2021 Jan 1.
Chitturi S, Farrell GC, Hashimoto E, Saibara T, Lau GK, Sollano JD; Asia-Pacific Working Party on NAFLD. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in the Asia-Pacific region: definitions and overview of proposed guidelines. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007 Jun;22(6):778-87. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2007.05001.x.
European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL); European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD); European Association for the Study of Obesity (EASO). EASL-EASD-EASO Clinical Practice Guidelines for the management of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Diabetologia. 2016 Jun;59(6):1121-40. doi: 10.1007/s00125-016-3902-y. No abstract available.
Kim SH, Lee JM, Kim JH, Kim KG, Han JK, Lee KH, Park SH, Yi NJ, Suh KS, An SK, Kim YJ, Son KR, Lee HS, Choi BI. Appropriateness of a donor liver with respect to macrosteatosis: application of artificial neural networks to US images--initial experience. Radiology. 2005 Mar;234(3):793-803. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2343040142. Epub 2005 Jan 21.
Hernaez R, Lazo M, Bonekamp S, Kamel I, Brancati FL, Guallar E, Clark JM. Diagnostic accuracy and reliability of ultrasonography for the detection of fatty liver: a meta-analysis. Hepatology. 2011 Sep 2;54(3):1082-1090. doi: 10.1002/hep.24452.
Dasarathy S, Dasarathy J, Khiyami A, Joseph R, Lopez R, McCullough AJ. Validity of real time ultrasound in the diagnosis of hepatic steatosis: a prospective study. J Hepatol. 2009 Dec;51(6):1061-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2009.09.001. Epub 2009 Sep 20.
Marshall RH, Eissa M, Bluth EI, Gulotta PM, Davis NK. Hepatorenal index as an accurate, simple, and effective tool in screening for steatosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012 Nov;199(5):997-1002. doi: 10.2214/AJR.11.6677.
Webb M, Yeshua H, Zelber-Sagi S, Santo E, Brazowski E, Halpern Z, Oren R. Diagnostic value of a computerized hepatorenal index for sonographic quantification of liver steatosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009 Apr;192(4):909-14. doi: 10.2214/AJR.07.4016.
Labyed Y, Milkowski A. Novel Method for Ultrasound-Derived Fat Fraction Using an Integrated Phantom. J Ultrasound Med. 2020 Dec;39(12):2427-2438. doi: 10.1002/jum.15364. Epub 2020 Jun 11.
Gao J, Wong C, Maar M, Park D. Reliability of performing ultrasound derived SWE and fat fraction in adult livers. Clin Imaging. 2021 Dec;80:424-429. doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2021.08.025. Epub 2021 Sep 17.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CHESS2303
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.