directSTIM™ Deep Brain Stimulation System Post-Market Clinical Follow-up Study on Essential Tremor

NCT ID: NCT05795218

Last Updated: 2024-08-09

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Total Enrollment

21 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-06-21

Study Completion Date

2024-08-08

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This is a prospective, multi-center, single arm post-market clinical follow-up study.

The present study investigates a product authorized on the European market that will be used per its intended use, and all procedures involved follow the standard of care.

This is an observational study to provide clinical evidence in support of DBS effectiveness in the treatment of ET when delivered by the directSTIM DBS system.

Twenty-one patients will be enrolled in this study. Subjects selected to participate in the study will be ET patients referred to uni- or bilateral DBS implant who meet the inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria.

Primary effectiveness variables will be measured at baseline for the identification of the worst limb (most affected by the disease), then 3 months post-surgery. Safety events will be collected between implant and 3-month visit, to evaluate potential confounding factors.

After completing the 3-month visit, subjects will exit the study, and continue to be followed by their physician per usual care.

Study will be conducted at minimum 3 centers in Europe.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This study investigates the benefits and safety of the use of the directSTIM Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) system within its intended use, to deliver DBS therapy to patients suffering from Essential Tremor (ET) whose motor symptoms are no longer optimally controlled through pharmaceutical treatment.

The objective of this study is to show that directSTIM is not inferior to competitor DBS Systems at alleviating postural or kinetic symptoms of Essential Tremor through the delivery of Deep Brain Stimulation therapy.

Data to be analyzed will be collected from ET patients referred for DBS surgery, who chose to get the directSTIM DBS System implanted after discussing its risks and benefits with their clinician.

All procedures involving the patient and the device follow the standard of care in place at the site for DBS.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Essential Tremor

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Deep Brain Stimulation

implant and DBS therapy with the directSTIM™ DBS system

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

DBS

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patient is 18 years of age or older.
* Patient with main tremor symptoms in upper limbs.
* Patient was referred for DBS surgery to treat Essential Tremor and chose the directSTIM DBS System
* Patient has a postural or kinetic tremor severity score of at least 3 out of 4 in the extremity intended for treatment on the Fahn-Tolosa-Marin Clinical Rating Scale for Tremor with medication, for the worst limb (i.e. most affected by disease)
* Patient accepts to abstain from caffeine for 8 hours and from alcohol for 12 hours before visit.
* Patient accepts to turn stimulation off for 1 hour prior to the 3-month follow-up visit.
* Patient is willing to provide a written informed consent.
* Patient is available for the study visit, and other study requirements.

Exclusion Criteria

* Cognitive impairment, or any characteristic that would limit study candidate's ability to complete study assessments, such as:

* Active major psychiatric disorder (including clinically significant depression as rated by the clinician)
* Patient had dementia interfering with their ability to co-operate or comply with study requirements or comprehend the informed consent (mini-mental exam score \<24 or otherwise not capable of discernment)
* Presence of an electrical or electromagnetic implant (e.g. cochlear implant, pacemaker)
* Previous brain ablation/surgical procedure
* Neurological injury, evidence of supraspinal central nervous system disease
* History of seizures
* Diathermy
* Abuse of drugs or alcohol.
* Patient had botulinum toxin injection less than 6 months prior to enrollment
* Patient is participating in another clinical study that would confound data analysis.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Aleva Neurotherapeutics SA

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Alexandre Michalis

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Aleva Neurotherapeutics SA

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus Dresden

Dresden, , Germany

Site Status

Universitätsklinikum Freiburg

Freiburg im Breisgau, , Germany

Site Status

Universitätsklinikum Hamburg

Hamburg, , Germany

Site Status

Medizinische Hochschule Hannover

Hanover, , Germany

Site Status

Universitätsklinikum Münster

Münster, , Germany

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Germany

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CLI-12082

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

PSA Versus STN DBS for DT
NCT06752434 RECRUITING NA