Study of the Impact of Frequency of Changing PICCline Dressings in Patients With Acute Leukemia
NCT ID: NCT05793801
Last Updated: 2025-04-14
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
60 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-06-06
2027-09-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Vascular Access in Hematological Patients - PICC Versus CVC
NCT02405728
The Clinical Efficacy of Midline Catheters
NCT03457259
Clinical Pharmacy for Patients with a PICC Line
NCT04359056
Central Venous Access Device Removal in Cancer Patients
NCT03855969
Iterative PICC Placement Versus Long Term Device
NCT02784730
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
In December 2013, the French Society of Hospital Hygiene (SF2H) published a guide of "Recommendations for good practices and management of risks associated with PICC" to help professionals in the use of this device. It states that the rate of dressing repair is set at a maximum of 8 days for a sterile semipermeable transparent dressing; however, this recommendation is based on a questionable level of evidence (grade E level of evidence according to the HAS). In the appendix to this guide, the analysis of the scientific literature does not highlight any articles comparing different dressing repair rates. An observational study was conducted at the University Hospital of Nîmes, in order to determine the rate of infection on PICCline in the Hematology Department. In 2019, out of the 90 PICClines applied (dressing changes every 2 days), 12 infections (local and/or systemic) were noted, i.e. 13.3%.
In order to know the current practices of the different hematology services in France, a survey was conducted to collect protocols for PICCline dressing changes. A total of 23 haematology departments were contacted, 18 of which responded. The observation was made that, although most departments respected the SF2H recommendation (15 out of 18), others proposed different rhythms of care: (a) in the Hematology department at Nîmes University Hospital, dressings are redone every 48 hours, (b) in Montpellier, the frequency was 2 to 3 times a week, (c) in Grenoble, the use of PICCline was abandoned by the medical team who noted too many infections and thromboses associated with this device, and (d) in Toulouse and Strasbourg, the PICCline was used less and less for these same reasons. Moreover, the SF2H recommendations are addressed in a general way to professionals and valid for all patients; but no study can currently affirm that they are applicable to a fragile population of immunocompromised patients in the context of intensive chemotherapy. Hematology patients have a high risk of febrile neutropenia, of around 80%, and this risk of immunosuppression is a non-negligible point in terms of infection prevention during patient management.
In 2019 in France, the Réseau de Prévention des Infections Associées aux Soins launched a campaign to monitor and prevent infections associated with invasive devices. For 3 months, data on the occurrence of infectious episodes were collected in 1001 healthcare facilities. Of the nearly 12,000 bacteremia episodes identified, 25.4% were associated with an intravascular device, 17% of which were PICCline. Moreover, the survey revealed that the highest rates of occurrence were found in the Intensive Care Unit, Oncology and Hematology departments and the prevalence of bacteremia associated with intravascular devices in Hematology represented 39.8%.
Hypothesis : increasing the rate of PICCline dressing changes will reduce the occurrence of catheter-related infections.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Control group
Patients receiving normal management with dressings changed once a week according to the SF2H recommendations.
Dressing change
The patient circuit corresponds to that of usual care.
Not part of usual patient management:
* The rhythm of PICCline dressing changes, which differed between the two groups.
* The collection of pain on a visual analog scale at each dressing change.
Experimental group
Patients whose dressings are changed every other day.
Dressing change
The patient circuit corresponds to that of usual care.
Not part of usual patient management:
* The rhythm of PICCline dressing changes, which differed between the two groups.
* The collection of pain on a visual analog scale at each dressing change.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Dressing change
The patient circuit corresponds to that of usual care.
Not part of usual patient management:
* The rhythm of PICCline dressing changes, which differed between the two groups.
* The collection of pain on a visual analog scale at each dressing change.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patient going on intensive induction chemotherapy (causing a "high risk" situation of severe infection defined as profound neutropenia ( Polymorphonuclear neutrophil count \<500/mm3) and lasting (\>7 days).
* Patients who have had a PICCline placed within the last 24 hours or who require a PICCline placement as part of their hospitalization under optimal hygiene and asepsis conditions.
* Patient housed in a protected environment (flow chamber or Plasmair®).
* Patient who has given free and informed consent.
* Patient affiliated or beneficiary of a health insurance plan.
* Adult patient (≥18 years old).
Exclusion Criteria
* Patient in an exclusion period determined by another study.
* Patient under court protection, guardianship or curatorship.
* Patient unable to give consent.
* Patient for whom it is impossible to give informed information.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University Hospital, Montpellier
OTHER
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Julie LASSALLE, Mme.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
CHU de Montpellier Hôpital St-Eloi
Montpellier, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
NIMAO/2021-2/JL-01
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.