Third Trimester Screening of Fetal Growth Restriction

NCT ID: NCT05787054

Last Updated: 2025-04-30

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

813 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-01-01

Study Completion Date

2023-05-27

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of this trial is to assess the efficacy of two screening protocols for the detection of fetal growth disorders.

In Italy at the moment the screening protocol should not be universal but only on clinical indications. In some Regions the screening is offered to every pregnant women with an early third trimester scan at 28-32 weeks'gestation or, in other Regions, according to the new national recommandations, a growth scan during the third trimester is provided only if there is a clinical indication.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The Aim of this trial is to assess the efficacy and efficiency of two screening protocols for fetal growth disorders: one providing an early fetal growth assessment at 28-32 weeks' (single scan) and the second one with the addition of a late third trimester screening at 35-37 weeks (longitudinal scan).

This study is designed to generate level 1 evidence of diagnostic efficacy.

MAIN OUTCOME: The main outcome of the two protocols in screening true late SGA fetuses is measured based on the antenatal detection of small for gestational age newborn basing on the IG21th newborn weight charts centiles \<the 10th according to gestational age and gender at delivery.

SECONDARY OUTCOME

* Antenatal detection of severe SGA \<3rd centile
* Mode of delivery
* Caesarean section rate according to Robson classes for singleton
* Composite mild adverse neonatal outcome (Apgar score at 5 minutes \<7, pH \< 7.10, or BD \>8mmol/L, admission at NICU)
* Composite severe adverse perinatal (stillbirth or term live birth associated with neonatal death, hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy, use of inotropes, need for mechanical ventilation, or severe metabolic acidosis (defined as a cord blood pH \<7•0 and base deficit \>12 mmol/L)

TERTIARY OUTCOME

* Number of ultrasound scans performed in outpatient clinics by medical indication (SSR-prescription) beyond Early-TT and late-TT scheduled exams, and number of ultrasound scans performed on indication in outpatient clinics minus the first one indicated.
* Number of ultrasound scans by patient choice
* Econometrics of the two protocols, and of the estimated sanitary costs of outcomes

4.2 EXPERIMENTAL PLAN

Women who agree to participate are randomized to a single scan Protocol vs longitudinal Scan protocol.

5\. STUDY POPULATION

Sample size is based on sensitivity in detecting SGA below 10th centile weight at birth. For the 28-32 group, sensitivity is based on results by Roma et al. (22.5%). The results published by Sovio et al. are instead taken for the "longitudinal" group (57% sensitivity). The sample size calculation was carried out for the comparison between the 28-32 only group vs. the "longitudinal". The calculation considered a confidence level of 95% (1-alpha) and an 80% power (1-beta), and a one to one ratio between the 28-32 only groups and the "longitudinal". According to Fleiss (Fleiss JL. Statistical methodsf or rates and proportions, II Ed. John Wiley \& Sons, New York, 1981. page45, formulas 3.18 \& 3.19), for the 28-32 only group vs. the "longitudinal",each arm should be 32 women, which implies 64 for two arms. SGA represent, as by definition, 10% of the total population: the sample size needed considering both AGA and SGA, is then 64x10=640. Considering 10% of drop-out and incomplete data the final sample size should be increased of such percentage, reaching 704 subjects. The sample should be recruited according to the number of deliveries per year of each institute involved in the multicenter study.

5.2 PATIENT SELECTION 5.2.1 INCLUSION CRITERIA Eligible cases are nulliparous pregnant women, with first trimester ultrasound assessment of gestational age, who conceived singleton fetuses. If the crown-rump-length (CRL) differs of more than ± 3-5 days from the last menstrual period, gestational age is calculated on the CRL.

5.2.2 EXCLUSION CRITERIA

* major medical disease
* high risk for preeclampsia on history or detected in those centres that perform pre-eclampsia screening at first trimester
* women older than 40 years on ASA low dose prophylaxis
* known immune disorders or clinical thrombophilic conditions;
* twin pregnancies;
* IVF
* suspected fetal anomalies
* Papp-A at Combined-Test\<0.2

5.3 WITHDRAWAL PROCEDURES If a patient, during the study protocol, wanted to withdrawal, this will not modify the subsequent monitoring of her pregnancy following local protocols.

6\. SUBJECT TREATMENT

• RANDOMIZATION : Patients who agree to participate and sign an informed consent, Women who agree to participate are randomized to the single scan Protocol vs Longitudinal-TT protocols.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Fetal Growth Retardation Fetal; Slow Growth

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

1:1
Primary Study Purpose

SCREENING

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Single scan

Single scan at 28-32 weeks

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Third trimester ultrasound

Intervention Type OTHER

Single scan versus Longitudinal scan

Longitudinal scan

Longitudinal scan at 28-32 AND 35-37 weeks

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Third trimester ultrasound

Intervention Type OTHER

Single scan versus Longitudinal scan

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Third trimester ultrasound

Single scan versus Longitudinal scan

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Eligible cases are nulliparous pregnant women, with first trimester ultrasound assessment of gestational age, who conceived singleton fetuses. If the crown-rump-length (CRL) differs of more than ± 3-5 days from the last menstrual period, gestational age is calculated on the CRL.

Exclusion Criteria

* major medical disease
* high risk for preeclampsia on history or detected in those centres that perform pre-eclampsia screening at first trimester
* women older than 40 years on ASA low dose prophylaxis
* known immune disorders or clinical thrombophilic conditions;
* twin pregnancies;
* IVF
* suspected fetal anomalies at any gestational age
* Papp-A at Combined-Test\<0.2
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

40 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Alessandra Familiari, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, UOC Ostetricia e Patologia ostetrica

Rome, RM, Italy

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Italy

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

1909

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.