Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
813 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-01-01
2023-05-27
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
In Italy at the moment the screening protocol should not be universal but only on clinical indications. In some Regions the screening is offered to every pregnant women with an early third trimester scan at 28-32 weeks'gestation or, in other Regions, according to the new national recommandations, a growth scan during the third trimester is provided only if there is a clinical indication.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Sonographic Evaluation of Fetal Growth in the Third Trimester of Low-risk Pregnancy: a Randomized Trial
NCT03200665
Doppler at the Diagnosis in Predicting Perinatal Outcomes in Early and Late-onset Fetal Growth Restriction
NCT05696223
Routine Ultrasound Screening in the Third Trimester
NCT01594463
Selective Fetal Growth Restriction in Monochorionic Twins - an International Investigation
NCT05952583
"Fetal GRowth AbnorMality DEtection Trial"
NCT05043753
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
This study is designed to generate level 1 evidence of diagnostic efficacy.
MAIN OUTCOME: The main outcome of the two protocols in screening true late SGA fetuses is measured based on the antenatal detection of small for gestational age newborn basing on the IG21th newborn weight charts centiles \<the 10th according to gestational age and gender at delivery.
SECONDARY OUTCOME
* Antenatal detection of severe SGA \<3rd centile
* Mode of delivery
* Caesarean section rate according to Robson classes for singleton
* Composite mild adverse neonatal outcome (Apgar score at 5 minutes \<7, pH \< 7.10, or BD \>8mmol/L, admission at NICU)
* Composite severe adverse perinatal (stillbirth or term live birth associated with neonatal death, hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy, use of inotropes, need for mechanical ventilation, or severe metabolic acidosis (defined as a cord blood pH \<7•0 and base deficit \>12 mmol/L)
TERTIARY OUTCOME
* Number of ultrasound scans performed in outpatient clinics by medical indication (SSR-prescription) beyond Early-TT and late-TT scheduled exams, and number of ultrasound scans performed on indication in outpatient clinics minus the first one indicated.
* Number of ultrasound scans by patient choice
* Econometrics of the two protocols, and of the estimated sanitary costs of outcomes
4.2 EXPERIMENTAL PLAN
Women who agree to participate are randomized to a single scan Protocol vs longitudinal Scan protocol.
5\. STUDY POPULATION
Sample size is based on sensitivity in detecting SGA below 10th centile weight at birth. For the 28-32 group, sensitivity is based on results by Roma et al. (22.5%). The results published by Sovio et al. are instead taken for the "longitudinal" group (57% sensitivity). The sample size calculation was carried out for the comparison between the 28-32 only group vs. the "longitudinal". The calculation considered a confidence level of 95% (1-alpha) and an 80% power (1-beta), and a one to one ratio between the 28-32 only groups and the "longitudinal". According to Fleiss (Fleiss JL. Statistical methodsf or rates and proportions, II Ed. John Wiley \& Sons, New York, 1981. page45, formulas 3.18 \& 3.19), for the 28-32 only group vs. the "longitudinal",each arm should be 32 women, which implies 64 for two arms. SGA represent, as by definition, 10% of the total population: the sample size needed considering both AGA and SGA, is then 64x10=640. Considering 10% of drop-out and incomplete data the final sample size should be increased of such percentage, reaching 704 subjects. The sample should be recruited according to the number of deliveries per year of each institute involved in the multicenter study.
5.2 PATIENT SELECTION 5.2.1 INCLUSION CRITERIA Eligible cases are nulliparous pregnant women, with first trimester ultrasound assessment of gestational age, who conceived singleton fetuses. If the crown-rump-length (CRL) differs of more than ± 3-5 days from the last menstrual period, gestational age is calculated on the CRL.
5.2.2 EXCLUSION CRITERIA
* major medical disease
* high risk for preeclampsia on history or detected in those centres that perform pre-eclampsia screening at first trimester
* women older than 40 years on ASA low dose prophylaxis
* known immune disorders or clinical thrombophilic conditions;
* twin pregnancies;
* IVF
* suspected fetal anomalies
* Papp-A at Combined-Test\<0.2
5.3 WITHDRAWAL PROCEDURES If a patient, during the study protocol, wanted to withdrawal, this will not modify the subsequent monitoring of her pregnancy following local protocols.
6\. SUBJECT TREATMENT
• RANDOMIZATION : Patients who agree to participate and sign an informed consent, Women who agree to participate are randomized to the single scan Protocol vs Longitudinal-TT protocols.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SCREENING
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Single scan
Single scan at 28-32 weeks
Third trimester ultrasound
Single scan versus Longitudinal scan
Longitudinal scan
Longitudinal scan at 28-32 AND 35-37 weeks
Third trimester ultrasound
Single scan versus Longitudinal scan
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Third trimester ultrasound
Single scan versus Longitudinal scan
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* high risk for preeclampsia on history or detected in those centres that perform pre-eclampsia screening at first trimester
* women older than 40 years on ASA low dose prophylaxis
* known immune disorders or clinical thrombophilic conditions;
* twin pregnancies;
* IVF
* suspected fetal anomalies at any gestational age
* Papp-A at Combined-Test\<0.2
18 Years
40 Years
FEMALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Alessandra Familiari, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, UOC Ostetricia e Patologia ostetrica
Rome, RM, Italy
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
1909
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.