Condylar Position Changes and TMJ Functions After BSSO Mandibular Setback, Low Medial Cut.
NCT ID: NCT05713084
Last Updated: 2023-02-06
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
24 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-09-28
2023-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Condylar Segment Repositioning Using CAD/CAM Generated Wafer After BSSO in Skeletal Mandibular Deformity
NCT03983265
Patient Specific Intraoral Inverted-L Osteotomy Modified With Inferior Alveolar Nerve Relocation in Corrective Mandibular Surgery
NCT05397002
Evaluation of the Accuracy of Patient Specific Implant in Fixation of Mandibular Sagittal Split Osteotomy
NCT07222904
Vertical Ramus Osteotomy With Iliac Graft Versus Sagittal Split Osteotomy
NCT06850194
Assessment of Facial Symmetry Following Fibula Free Flap Fixated in a Prosthetically Favorable Position Versus the Inferior Border Position for Mandibular Reconstruction
NCT06790628
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Description of research question:
P: Population: Patients with facial skeletal deformity and need for mandibular setback using bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSRO) alone or combined with lefort osteotomy.
I: Intervention: Patients with facial skeletal deformity and need and for mandibular setback using low medial cut osteotomy as modification of bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy (BSSRO).
C: Comparator: Patients with facial skeletal deformity and need and for mandibular setback using traditional high medial cut osteotomy bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy (BSSRO).
O: Outcome: Comparing the post-operative condylar positions changes and TMJ functions of two osteotomies.
Research question:
Is using low medial cut osteotomy modification in BSSRO in mandibular setback will provide more control over proximal segment position than traditional high medial cut through:
1. limit the segments interference and so maximizes the passive bony contact across the osteotomy site after surgically repositioning the distal segment
2. Passively positioned the proximal segment without displacement of the condyle from its normal position.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
mandibular setback using low medial cut ostetomy
mandibular setback using low medial cut ostetomy by keeping the cut ''low'' or close to the mandibular occlusal plane and ''short'' or terminating anterior to the lingula.
mandibular setback using BSSRO
mandibular setback using BSSRO
mandibular setback using high medial cut ostetomy
mandibular setback by placement of the medial ramus osteotomy cut 'high', just a few millimeters above the lingula, superior and lateral to the entrance point of the inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) into the mandibular foramen ,
mandibular setback using BSSRO
mandibular setback using BSSRO
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
mandibular setback using BSSRO
mandibular setback using BSSRO
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients in need of mandibular setback using bilateral sagittal split osteotomy.
* All patients are free from any systemic disease that may affect normal bone healing.
* Patient with facial deformity will be treated with mandibular setback either mono or bimaxilary surgeries
* Patient with facial deformity will be treated with mandibular setback either surgery first approach or orthofirst approach.
* Sufficient dentition to reproduce the occlusal relationships
* Patient's consent to participate
Exclusion Criteria
* Intra-bony lesions or infections that may interfere with surgery.
* Previous orthognathic surgeries.
* Patients with all types of facial clefts
18 Years
60 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Cairo University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Mahmoud Mohammed Mahmoud Hussein Alaswad
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Fahmy Mobarak, professor
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Cairo University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Faculty of Dentistry Cairo University
Cairo, , Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
14922
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.