Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
655 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2022-10-01
2024-10-15
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Effect of Consecutive Fecal Microbiota Transplantation on Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD)
NCT04465032
Improving Insulin Resistance To Treat Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: A Pilot Study
NCT02457286
Assessment of Endothelial Function in Patients With Non Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease and the Impact of Statin Treatment
NCT01987310
Different Doses of ZED1227 vs. Placebo in NAFLD
NCT05305599
Influence of Diabetic Control on the Degree of Liver Fibrosis Assessed by Non-invasive Scores in Patients Followed in Diabetology
NCT05605821
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a disease of alarmingly increasing prevalence. Progression along the NAFLD spectrum often goes unnoticed since it is often asymptomatic. Awareness among health care workers and implementation of care paths to detect progressing NAFLD stages are limited. Without clear guidance papers or robust care pathways for risk stratification, the current diagnostic approach for NAFLD is highly variable, leading to both underdiagnosis of advanced stages of disease, andunnecessary referrals for mild stages of disease. This calls for a comprehensive care path consisting of non-invasive alternatives to detect those patients with severe cases of NAFLD. Particularly the use of a sequential, two-tiered care path algorithm is promising as it has the ability to detect underlying advanced cases of fibrosis, and has previously been shown to be cost-effective. This was shown by dr. Ankur Srivastava, who designed a pathway consisting of FIB4-score and ELF-test that led to a reduction of unnecessary referrals to the hepatologist by 80%, whilst improving the detection of advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis 5- and 3-fold,respectively (8). In this study the investigation of several two-tiered sequential care path algorithms, comprised of the FIB4-score, VCTE and the ELF-test, for the detection of advanced stages of NAFLD-fibrosis is proposed: the Nijmegen-Leiden-AmsterdamNAFLD-NASH 2-tiered care path study: NLA2-study.
Objective of the study:
The aim of the study is to improve case finding of advanced cases of NAFLD (≥F3 fibrosis), whilst simultaneously reducing unnecessary referrals for mild cases (\<F3 fibrosis). Additionally, the aim is to increase awareness of NAFLD, and NAFLD-related complications, and to assess the cost-effectiveness of the different proposed care paths compared to current regular care.
Study design:
This is a care innovation study, with an estimated duration of three years. The intend is to commence the study at three academic medical centres namely in Nijmegen, Leiden and Amsterdam, with the intention to include other non-academic hospitals after the initial roll-out. The study has both a prospective and a retrospective part. The prospective part consists of participants who are deemed by their treating specialist physician to be at risk of severe NASH fibrosis. Participants will be invited to attend a study visit.
This study visit will consist of, among others: anthropometric measurements, blood pressure measurement, blood sampling and VCTE. The diagnostic testing for potentially underlying advanced (≥F3) liver fibrosis consists of the FIB4-score, VCTE and the ELF-test. A blood sample will be stored for additional biomarker testing. Based on predefined cut-offs for the FIB4-score and liver stiffness measurement (LSM) (measured using VCTE), participants will be classified as being at low or high risk of advanced (≥F3)fibrosis (see figure 1). The ELF-test will be analysed in bulk and will thus not be used for risk assessment. Participants classified at low risk will remain under the care of their treating specialist. Participants classified at high risk of advanced (≥F3) fibrosis will be referred to a hepatologist. Read-outs of the electronic health records (EHR) of all participants will be performed at 24 months after inclusion in the study, an dat six months for those classified at high risk. Read-outs will be performed to assess the correctness of the risk assessment and subsequent referral to the hepatologist.
The three different sequential, two-tiered care path algorithms will be evaluated upon completion of the study. The diagnostic accuracy, defined as sensitivity, specificity, predictive values and AUROCs, of the three different care path algorithms will be calculated. The diagnostic performance will be expressed as the percentage of correct referrals and the percentage of unnecessary referrals of the different care path algorithms and the individual non-invasive tests, compared to regular care.
Study population:
The study population consists of adults (≥ 18 years old) who are suspected by their treating specialist to suffer from a severe stage of NAFLD-fibrosis. Exclusion criteria are, most notably, a previous diagnosis of advanced (≥F3) fibrosis, any other known chronic liver disease, use of drugs that may cause drug-induced steatosis, and present excessive alcohol use. The aim is to include 200 patients in analyses in total, of which 100 will be referred using the NLA2 study and 100 through regular care. The latter group will form the prospective comparator arm. This necessitates a 50% adherence rate of participating hospitals.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Prospective care path arm
Participants who enter the care path will make up the prospective care path arm.
In patients entering the care path three diagnostic tests for liver fibrosis will be performed. FIB4-score, Vibration controlled transient elastography and Enhanced Liver Fibrosis test
FIB4-score
A score which estimates the risk for advanced liver fibrosis, based on: age, ALT, AST and thrombocytes
Vibration controlled transient elastography
VCTE measures the speed of a mechanically generated shear wave across the liver to derive a liver stiffness measurement (LSM), a marker of hepatic fibrosis
Enhanced Liver Fibrosis test
The ELF-test is a non-invasive blood test that measures three direct markers of liver fibrosis: hyaluronic acid (HA), procollagen III amino-terminal peptide (PIIINP), and tissue inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinase 1 (TIMP-1).
Prospective arm of 'regular care'
Patients who are referred to the hepatologist in participating centers during the study period without using the care path (e.g. because of altered liver function tests for instance), will be the prospective 'regular care' arm
No interventions assigned to this group
Retrospective arm of 'regular care'
The investigators will do an data extraction of the electronic health records of patients referred to the hepatologist in the five years prior to the study. They will make up the retrospective comparative arm of regular care
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
FIB4-score
A score which estimates the risk for advanced liver fibrosis, based on: age, ALT, AST and thrombocytes
Vibration controlled transient elastography
VCTE measures the speed of a mechanically generated shear wave across the liver to derive a liver stiffness measurement (LSM), a marker of hepatic fibrosis
Enhanced Liver Fibrosis test
The ELF-test is a non-invasive blood test that measures three direct markers of liver fibrosis: hyaluronic acid (HA), procollagen III amino-terminal peptide (PIIINP), and tissue inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinase 1 (TIMP-1).
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Suspected by treating physician to suffer from a severe stage of NAFLD-fibrosis.
Exclusion Criteria
* Any other known chronic liver disease (alcoholic steatohepatitis, hepatitis B, hepatitis C, autoimmune hepatitis, hemochromatosis, Wilsons disease, alpha-1-antitrypsin deficiency);
* Drugs that may cause drug-induced hepatic steatosis, (table provided elsewhere)
* Present excessive alcohol use, defined as \> 2 units/day for women and \> 3 units/day for men;
* A psychiatric, addictive or any other disorder that compromises the subject's ability to understand the study content and to give written informed consent for the participation in the study.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Maag Lever Darm Stichting
OTHER
Radboud University Medical Center
OTHER
Leiden University Medical Center
OTHER
Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Onno Holleboom, MD, PhD
Vascular internist and endocrinologist, Assistant professor, Principal investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Onno Holleboom, MD PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Amsterdam UMC, location AMC
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Radboudumc
Nijmegen, Gelderland, Netherlands
Amsterdam UMC, location AMC
Amsterdam, North Holland, Netherlands
Leiden universitair medisch centrum
Leiden, South Holland, Netherlands
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Stols-Goncalves D, Hovingh GK, Nieuwdorp M, Holleboom AG. NAFLD and Atherosclerosis: Two Sides of the Same Dysmetabolic Coin? Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2019 Dec;30(12):891-902. doi: 10.1016/j.tem.2019.08.008. Epub 2019 Oct 17.
Tushuizen ME, Holleboom AG, Koot BGP, Blokzijl H, van Mil SWC, Koek GH. [Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease; a full-bodied epidemic]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2020 Feb 27;164:D4096. Dutch.
Lazarus JV, Ekstedt M, Marchesini G, Mullen J, Novak K, Pericas JM, Roel E, Romero-Gomez M, Ratziu V, Tacke F, Cortez-Pinto H, Anstee QM; EASL International Liver Foundation NAFLD Policy Review Collaborators. A cross-sectional study of the public health response to non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in Europe. J Hepatol. 2020 Jan;72(1):14-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2019.08.027. Epub 2019 Sep 10.
Harris R, Harman DJ, Card TR, Aithal GP, Guha IN. Prevalence of clinically significant liver disease within the general population, as defined by non-invasive markers of liver fibrosis: a systematic review. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Apr;2(4):288-297. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(16)30205-9. Epub 2017 Feb 1.
Crossan C, Tsochatzis EA, Longworth L, Gurusamy K, Davidson B, Rodriguez-Peralvarez M, Mantzoukis K, O'Brien J, Thalassinos E, Papastergiou V, Burroughs A. Cost-effectiveness of non-invasive methods for assessment and monitoring of liver fibrosis and cirrhosis in patients with chronic liver disease: systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess. 2015 Jan;19(9):1-409, v-vi. doi: 10.3310/hta19090.
Tapper EB, Sengupta N, Hunink MG, Afdhal NH, Lai M. Cost-Effective Evaluation of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease With NAFLD Fibrosis Score and Vibration Controlled Transient Elastography. Am J Gastroenterol. 2015 Sep;110(9):1298-304. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2015.241. Epub 2015 Aug 25.
Srivastava A, Gailer R, Tanwar S, Trembling P, Parkes J, Rodger A, Suri D, Thorburn D, Sennett K, Morgan S, Tsochatzis EA, Rosenberg W. Prospective evaluation of a primary care referral pathway for patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. J Hepatol. 2019 Aug;71(2):371-378. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2019.03.033. Epub 2019 Apr 6.
Younossi ZM, Koenig AB, Abdelatif D, Fazel Y, Henry L, Wymer M. Global epidemiology of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease-Meta-analytic assessment of prevalence, incidence, and outcomes. Hepatology. 2016 Jul;64(1):73-84. doi: 10.1002/hep.28431. Epub 2016 Feb 22.
Estes C, Razavi H, Loomba R, Younossi Z, Sanyal AJ. Modeling the epidemic of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease demonstrates an exponential increase in burden of disease. Hepatology. 2018 Jan;67(1):123-133. doi: 10.1002/hep.29466. Epub 2017 Dec 1.
Younossi Z, Anstee QM, Marietti M, Hardy T, Henry L, Eslam M, George J, Bugianesi E. Global burden of NAFLD and NASH: trends, predictions, risk factors and prevention. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Jan;15(1):11-20. doi: 10.1038/nrgastro.2017.109. Epub 2017 Sep 20.
Ruissen MM, Mak AL, Beuers U, Tushuizen ME, Holleboom AG. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: a multidisciplinary approach towards a cardiometabolic liver disease. Eur J Endocrinol. 2020 Sep;183(3):R57-R73. doi: 10.1530/EJE-20-0065.
Taylor RS, Taylor RJ, Bayliss S, Hagstrom H, Nasr P, Schattenberg JM, Ishigami M, Toyoda H, Wai-Sun Wong V, Peleg N, Shlomai A, Sebastiani G, Seko Y, Bhala N, Younossi ZM, Anstee QM, McPherson S, Newsome PN. Association Between Fibrosis Stage and Outcomes of Patients With Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Gastroenterology. 2020 May;158(6):1611-1625.e12. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.01.043. Epub 2020 Feb 4.
Dulai PS, Singh S, Patel J, Soni M, Prokop LJ, Younossi Z, Sebastiani G, Ekstedt M, Hagstrom H, Nasr P, Stal P, Wong VW, Kechagias S, Hultcrantz R, Loomba R. Increased risk of mortality by fibrosis stage in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Hepatology. 2017 May;65(5):1557-1565. doi: 10.1002/hep.29085. Epub 2017 Mar 31.
Sumida Y, Nakajima A, Itoh Y. Limitations of liver biopsy and non-invasive diagnostic tests for the diagnosis of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease/nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Jan 14;20(2):475-85. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i2.475.
Alexander M, Loomis AK, van der Lei J, Duarte-Salles T, Prieto-Alhambra D, Ansell D, Pasqua A, Lapi F, Rijnbeek P, Mosseveld M, Avillach P, Egger P, Dhalwani NN, Kendrick S, Celis-Morales C, Waterworth DM, Alazawi W, Sattar N. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and risk of incident acute myocardial infarction and stroke: findings from matched cohort study of 18 million European adults. BMJ. 2019 Oct 8;367:l5367. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l5367.
Graupera I, Thiele M, Serra-Burriel M, Caballeria L, Roulot D, Wong GL, Fabrellas N, Guha IN, Arslanow A, Exposito C, Hernandez R, Aithal GP, Galle PR, Pera G, Wong VW, Lammert F, Gines P, Castera L, Krag A; Investigators of the LiverScreen Consortium. Low Accuracy of FIB-4 and NAFLD Fibrosis Scores for Screening for Liver Fibrosis in the Population. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022 Nov;20(11):2567-2576.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2021.12.034. Epub 2021 Dec 29.
Marjot T, Moolla A, Cobbold JF, Hodson L, Tomlinson JW. Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease in Adults: Current Concepts in Etiology, Outcomes, and Management. Endocr Rev. 2020 Jan 1;41(1):bnz009. doi: 10.1210/endrev/bnz009.
Eddowes PJ, Sasso M, Allison M, Tsochatzis E, Anstee QM, Sheridan D, Guha IN, Cobbold JF, Deeks JJ, Paradis V, Bedossa P, Newsome PN. Accuracy of FibroScan Controlled Attenuation Parameter and Liver Stiffness Measurement in Assessing Steatosis and Fibrosis in Patients With Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. Gastroenterology. 2019 May;156(6):1717-1730. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.01.042. Epub 2019 Jan 25.
Siddiqui MS, Vuppalanchi R, Van Natta ML, Hallinan E, Kowdley KV, Abdelmalek M, Neuschwander-Tetri BA, Loomba R, Dasarathy S, Brandman D, Doo E, Tonascia JA, Kleiner DE, Chalasani N, Sanyal AJ; NASH Clinical Research Network. Vibration-Controlled Transient Elastography to Assess Fibrosis and Steatosis in Patients With Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Jan;17(1):156-163.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2018.04.043. Epub 2018 Apr 26.
Vali Y, Lee J, Boursier J, Spijker R, Loffler J, Verheij J, Brosnan MJ, Bocskei Z, Anstee QM, Bossuyt PM, Zafarmand MH; LITMUS systematic review team(dagger). Enhanced liver fibrosis test for the non-invasive diagnosis of fibrosis in patients with NAFLD: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Hepatol. 2020 Aug;73(2):252-262. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2020.03.036. Epub 2020 Apr 8.
Younossi ZM, Golabi P, de Avila L, Paik JM, Srishord M, Fukui N, Qiu Y, Burns L, Afendy A, Nader F. The global epidemiology of NAFLD and NASH in patients with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Hepatol. 2019 Oct;71(4):793-801. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2019.06.021. Epub 2019 Jul 4.
Nabi O, Lacombe K, Boursier J, Mathurin P, Zins M, Serfaty L. Prevalence and Risk Factors of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease and Advanced Fibrosis in General Population: the French Nationwide NASH-CO Study. Gastroenterology. 2020 Aug;159(2):791-793.e2. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.04.048. Epub 2020 May 4. No abstract available.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
NL81357.018.22
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.