Comparison of Different Types of Prosthetic Foott

NCT ID: NCT05691998

Last Updated: 2023-01-20

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Total Enrollment

20 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-01-25

Study Completion Date

2023-04-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The main purpose of this study is to determine the experiences of patients with different types of prostetic feet (carbon, hydraulic or microprocessor controlled).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

One of the main goals in the rehabilitation of amputees is to provide optimal and natural ambulation. For this purpose, suitable socket-suspension type, appropriate knee joint and foot should be prescribed. In the selection of feet, the age, occupation, characteristics of the geographical region, mental status and activity level should be considered. In addition, the previous prosthesis experience of the people should definitely be taken into account during prosthesis prescribing.The main purpose of this study is to determine the experiences of patients with different types of prostetic feet (carbon, hydraulic or microprocessor controlled).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

the Previous Prosthetic Foot Experience of Patients With Amputation

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_ONLY

Study Time Perspective

CROSS_SECTIONAL

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Patients

the previous prosthesis experience

Prosthetic foot questionnaire

Intervention Type OTHER

Prosthetic foot related questions will be asked to the patients

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Prosthetic foot questionnaire

Prosthetic foot related questions will be asked to the patients

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Aged between 18-65 years
* Lower limb amputation
* Having used at least 2 different foot types (carbon, hydrolic, microprocessor-controlled)

Exclusion Criteria

* Having used the single type of foot until now
* Presence of neurological, cardiovascular, and pulmonary disease that may affect walking performance
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Gaziler Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Education and Research Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Yasin Demir

Associated Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Yasin Demir, Associated Professor

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

[email protected]

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Yasin Demir, Associated Professor

Role: CONTACT

+903122911806

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Kilinc Kamaci G, Artuc SE, Ceylan H, Tekin E, Kanlioglu O, Orucu Atar M, Demir Y, Aydemir K. Comparison of different types of prosthetic feet in patients with unilateral transtibial amputation; patient perspective. J Orthop Sci. 2025 Aug 13:S0949-2658(25)00207-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jos.2025.07.007. Online ahead of print.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 40813189 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

33

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Evidence-Based Orthotics Prosthetics Practices
NCT06175364 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA
Impact of Improving Footwear Options
NCT05601869 RECRUITING NA