PCO2 Gab Marker of Tissue Adequacy of Cardiac Output in Shock State

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Total Enrollment

137 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-01-01

Study Completion Date

2024-01-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

1. To assess validity of of central and pulmonary veno - arterial CO2 gradient to predict fluid responsiveness and to guide fluid management and determine the cut off point to continue or stop resuscitation.
2. comparison between PCO2 gab and left ventricular outflow tract velocity time integral to determine whether to continue or stop resuscitation and whether PCO2 gab is a surrogate of cardiac output or not.

Related Clinical Trials

Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.

Cardiac Responsiveness Assessment by CO2

NCT05430880

VCO2 Variation in Intensive Care as a Marker of Fluid Responsiveness Cardiac Index Variation Transpulmonary Thermodilution in Patients on Controlled Ventilation With Shock

UNKNOWN

Time Course Evolution of Cardiac Output

NCT03694717

Acute Circulatory Failure

COMPLETED

Peripheral Perfusion Versus Lactate Targeted Fluid Resuscitation in Septic Shock

NCT03762005

Septic Shock Hyperlactatemia Peripheral Perfusion

UNKNOWN NA

The Value of Central Venous-arterial Carbon Dioxide Difference

NCT04761237

Jugular Veins Radial Artery Carbon Dioxide

COMPLETED NA

Esophageal Echo Assessment of LV Function During Acute Normovolemic Hemodilution Using Crystalloid or Hypertonic Saline

NCT00683007

Acute Hypovolemia

COMPLETED NA

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Assessing the adequacy of oxygen delivery with oxygen requirements is one of the key-goal of hemodynamic resuscitation. Clinical examination, lactate and central or mixed venous oxygen saturation (SvO2 an ScvO2 respectively) all have their limitations (Gavelli et al., 2019). The veno- arterial difference in CO2 tension (delta CO2 or PCO2 gap) is not indicator of anaerobic metabolism since it is influenced by the oxygen consumption. By contrast, it reliably indicates whether blood flow to remove is sufficient to carry CO2 from prepheral tissues to the lung in view of its clearance: it, thus, reflects the adequacy of cardiac output with the metabolic condition (valley et al., 2013). The gap is a marker of adequacy of venous blood flow to remove CO2 produced rather than a marker of tissue hypoxia (Vallet et al., 2013).

The gab can be calculated from simultaneous sampling of central venous blood from a central vein catheter and arterial blood.

Determining the delta PCO2 during resuscitation of septic shock Patients might be useful when deciding when to continue resuscitation despite a central venous oxygen saturation\>70% associated with elevated blood lactate levels. because a high blood lactate level is not a discriminatory factor in determining the source of that stress, an increased delta PCO2 (\>6 mmHg) could be used to identify Patients who still remain inadequately resuscitated.

Fluid responsiveness in shocked patients is conventionally defined as an increase of at least 10% to 15% in stroke volume in response to a fluid challenge. Assessment of response to a fluid challenge can be guided with echocardiography. It is achieved by measuring left ventricular outflow tract velocity time integral (LVOT VI) immediately before and after fluid challenge (miller et al; 2016).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Shock

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

OTHER

Study Time Perspective

CROSS_SECTIONAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* all critical ill-patients with acute physiological assessment and chronic health evaluation II score (APACHE II score)≥25 with central line insertion, in the critical care uint of internal medicine department of Assuit university hospital in the period between January 2023 to January 2024.