Use of Galvanic Skin Response to Measure Peripheral Block Activity

NCT ID: NCT05678777

Last Updated: 2023-01-10

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Total Enrollment

50 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-01-30

Study Completion Date

2023-03-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

the investigators aim in this study is to determine whether the block is successful in successful infraclavicular brachial plexus blocks performed with USG, according to the change in GSR value in the upper extremity blocked due to sympathetic nerve blockade. Block success will be evaluated by sensory and motor examination of the blocked arm.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Peripheral nerve block is one of the commonly used blocks in regional anesthesia. In regional anesthesia applications, there are important advantages such as being conscious of the patient, expressing his complaints, continuation of spontaneous breathing, preservation of airway reflexes, continuation of analgesia in the postoperative period and early mobilization of the patient.

In 1978, ultrasound (USG) was used for the first time in peripheral nerve block. With USG, it is possible to monitor the nerves and anatomical structures, follow the needle, and reduce the dose by monitoring the distribution of the local anesthetic administered. Therefore, USG-guided peripheral nerve blocks are frequently used in anesthesia practice.

The Galvanic Skin Response (GSR) is a simple way to obtain autonomic nervous system dependent sweat gland function as a parameter.

Physically, the galvanic skin response is the change in the electrical structure of the skin to various stimuli. Changes in tension measured from the skin surface are recorded. The galvanic skin response is a useful, simple and reproducible electrophysiological technique for investigating sympathetic nervous system function.

The relaxation, calming response that accompanies an increase in skin resistance (causing a decrease in GSR meter) is the body's combat response that accompanies a decrease in skin resistance (causing an increase in GSR meter). Generally, low conductivity is a sign of relaxation. High conductivity is a sign of emotional, mental, or physical arousal. The galvanic skin response is a simple way to obtain autonomic nervous system-related sweat gland function as a parameter.

the investigators aim in this study is to determine whether the block is successful in successful infraclavicular brachial plexus blocks performed with USG, according to the change in GSR value in the upper extremity blocked due to sympathetic nerve blockade. Block success will be evaluated by sensory and motor examination of the blocked arm. The relaxation, calming response that accompanies an increase in skin resistance (causing a decrease in GSR meter) is the body's combat response that accompanies a decrease in skin resistance (causing an increase in GSR meter). Generally, low conductivity is a sign of relaxation. High conductivity is a sign of emotional, mental, or physical arousal.

In the investigators clinic, peripheral nerve blocks accompanied by USG are frequently used in anesthesia practice.

OBJECTİVE: Successful peripheral nerve blockade results in local vasodilation, increased local blood flow, and some increase in skin temperature due to sympathetic fiber blocking. However, in busy operating room conditions, these clinical signs may not appear quickly enough to confirm block adequacy, especially before or during surgery, and may not be used for clinical decision making. Traditional methods for assessing block success are time consuming and require patient cooperation. For the success of the block, it is aimed to use the Galvanic Skin Response (GSR) value, which is a non-invasive method that does not require patient cooperation and provides rapid evaluation.

Galvanic Skin Response (GSR) measurement is a non-invasive and rapid assessment that allows us to observe the skin resistance change with two probes attached to the fingertip. In the investigators study, we aimed to show that the Galvanic Skin Response (GSR) measurement method is a reliable and objective method to evaluate the adequacy of peripheral nerve blocks.

METHODS: This research; It is a prospective observational study. In patients who have performed infraclavicular brachial plexus block; The correlation of Galvanic skin response (GSR) values measured with the finger probe that we attached to the patient's two fingers before and after the block, with the success of the block will be examined. the investigators study is not invasive, it is only in the form of examining finger probe measurements and will not create an additional cost for the investigators hospital and the participants..

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Regional Anesthesia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_CONTROL

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Galvanic Skin Response

The probe will be attached to the patient's finger and the Galvanic Skin Response will be measured

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. ASA1-ASA2 patients
2. Patients between the ages of 18-65
3. Patients who underwent infraclavicular block

Exclusion Criteria

1. ASA3-ASA4 patients
2. Patients younger than 18 years old and over 65 years old
3. Patients who do not want to be included in the study
4. Patients in whom infraclavicular brachial plexus block is contraindicated
5. Patients who cannot cooperate
6. Those with diabetes mellitus
7. Patients who have failed infraclavicular brachial plexus block and switched to general anesthesia
8. Those with peripheral artery disease
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Adiyaman University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Fikret Ozerdem

assistant doctor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Adiyaman University

Adıyaman, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Öznur Uludağ

Role: CONTACT

05052309730 ext. 04162231690

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Öznur Uludağ, head of department

Role: primary

05052309730 ext. 04162231690

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Tarvainen MP, Koistinen AS, Valkonen-Korhonen M, Partanen J, Karjalainen PA. Analysis of galvanic skin responses with principal components and clustering techniques. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2001 Oct;48(10):1071-9. doi: 10.1109/10.951509.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11585030 (View on PubMed)

Marhofer P, Greher M, Kapral S. Ultrasound guidance in regional anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 2005 Jan;94(1):7-17. doi: 10.1093/bja/aei002. Epub 2004 Jul 26.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 15277302 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Fadime Tosun

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

18/01/2022-2022/1-10

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.