Prospective Multicenter Observational Study on the Use of NEOCEMENT® for the Treatment of Bone Defects
NCT ID: NCT05676905
Last Updated: 2025-01-31
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
165 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2024-11-06
2024-11-06
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Evaluation of the Safety and Performance of the Neocement®
NCT06973226
Evaluation of the Safety and Performance of the Neocement® Inject P
NCT06973239
Osseous Setting Improvement With Co-implantation of Osseous Matrix and Mesenchymal Progenitors Cells From Autologous Bone Marrow
NCT00557635
Prospective Study for the Evaluation of the Cementless Anatomic Femoral Stem Minimax -Launay
NCT06012656
Autologous Osteoblastic Cells Implantation to Early Stage Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head
NCT02890537
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
This device is intended to be used in filling bony voids or gaps in the extremities, which have either been surgically created, or the result of traumatic injury to the bone and are not intrinsic to the stability of the bony structure. Hence, it is intended to be used by healthcare professionals (surgeons) when bone ingrowth and consolidation are required.
Neocement is contraindicated to use in load bearing applications, and must not be used where the implantation site is unstable and not rigidly fixed. Additionally, it is also not indicated to use in cases where the implantation site presents infection, nor in cases where poor bone healing would be expected, such as metabolic, immunologic or systemic disorders.
Bone grafting technique has been employed for several decades by orthopaedic surgeons to potentiate the process of bone repair across all orthopaedics' subspecialties.
Despite autografts with cancellous bone being considered the "gold standard" for bone regeneration due to their osteogenic elements, there are numerous disadvantages associated to this technique, including extended surgical time, local pain and swelling from donor segments.
The use of synthetic substitutes, like calcium phosphate cements, have significant advantages, including decreased risk of infection from human pathogens, and unlimited availability in various shapes and sizes. Thus, reconstruction and/or filling of bone defects caused by trauma, disease, or tumour resection in long bones using calcium phosphate cements has proven to be an effective and safe alternative to reduce donor-site morbidity associated to autografting, whilst providing support for bone regeneration.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Neocement
Bone graft substitutes
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Age ≥ 18 years of both genders (male and female)
* Patient signed informed consent form (for data collection)
* Bone defects surgically created or osseous defects created from traumatic injury to the bone
* Bone skeletal defects that are not intrinsic to the stability of bone structure OR site which can be stabilized
Exclusion Criteria
* Metabolic bone diseases;
* Severe degenerative disease conditions in which general bone grafting is not advisable;
* Active malignancy.
* Inability to understand consent and objectives of the study;
* Pregnant women or breastfeeding women;
* Unable to undergo medical monitoring for geographical, social or psychological reasons.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
European Clinical Research Infrastructure Network
OTHER
Horizon 2020 - European Commission
OTHER
Bioceramed
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Nuno Ribeiro, M. Doctor
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Hospital Lusíadas Lisboa
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Lisboa Central
Lisbon, Lisbon District, Portugal
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
TBMED1.1
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.