The Association Between Diabetes Stress, Self-efficacy, Self-management, and Glycemic Control in Children and Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus

NCT ID: NCT05666791

Last Updated: 2023-01-03

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Total Enrollment

200 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-12-21

Study Completion Date

2023-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aims of this study were to: (1) Investigate the association between perceived diabetes-specific stress, self-efficacy, self-management and glycemic control in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1D). (2) Explore whether self-efficacy and self-management mediates the relationship between perceived diabetes stress and glycemic control in adolescents with type 1 diabetes (T1D). (3) Explore whether self-efficacy and self-management moderated the relationship between perceived diabetes stress and glycemic control in adolescents with type 1 diabetes (T1D).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Investigators have found that type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1D) is more commonly diagnosed in childhood compared with adulthood; optimizing HbA1c level is essential for reducing the risk and severity of complications; childhood glycemic control is also associated with further risk of physical and psychological health problems as an adult, nevertheless, adolescence is a stage of transition to adulthood, compared with other age groups, and adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1D) have worse glycemic control.

Diabetes-specific stress has been previously defined as a negative experience involving physiological, emotional, and behavior changes in relation to a diabetes specific stressor, it is also associated with psychological well-being and mediates the relationship between diabetes-specific cognitive appraisals and glycemic control.

Cross-sectional studies also indicate that self-efficacy and self-management are positively correlated, importantly, in adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1D), higher self-efficacy was associated with lower HbA1c levels; higher self-efficacy was also directly associated with better self-management and lower HbA1c levels.

Individuals with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1D) need to self-manage their HbA1c levels throughout their lives, self-management also refers to the daily active management of illness-related activities for achieving glycemic control; accordingly, self-management in adolescents is always challenging, and glycemic control is typically at its worst in the transitional period between adolescence and adulthood.

Considering that diabetes-specific stress might be directly associated with self-efficacy, self-management and glycemic control in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1D), further study is still warranted. Understanding the factors and pathways associated with subsequent HbA1c levels could assist in the development of comprehensive and timely interventions to improve glycemic control among this population.

This study applied as a cross-sectional study; Demographic characteristics, Diabetes-specific stress, self -efficacy and self-management were collected using self -reported questionnaires; HbA1c levels will be obtained from medical records.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Children and Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_ONLY

Study Time Perspective

CROSS_SECTIONAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Exclusion Criteria

* Participants diagnosed with cognitive or mental health problems were excluded.
Minimum Eligible Age

8 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

25 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Taiwan University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Hsin-Yi Wang, master's student

Role: CONTACT

+8862 2312-3456 ext. 261057

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

202210117RINC

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.