Human Amniotic Membrane (hAM) for Stage II Maxillomandibular Osteonecrosis Management
NCT ID: NCT05664815
Last Updated: 2024-09-19
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
PHASE2
66 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-09-22
2026-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Surgical Management of Stage-2 MRONJ With Transplantation of HAM
NCT04967963
Xenograft and Posterior Mandibular Socket Filling
NCT02736773
Leukocyte- and Platelet-Rich Fibrin in the Surgical Treatment of Medication-related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw
NCT06419010
Assessment of Platelet Rich Fibrin Efficiency on Healing Delay and on Jawbone Osteochemonecrosis Provoked by Bisphosphonates
NCT01526915
Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate in Treating Mandibular Cystic Defects
NCT05748756
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
There is no reference document for their management, which requires antibiotics, local antiseptics and tissue debridement sometimes associated with sequestrectomy. The objective of treatment is very often to obtain healing of the oral mucosa to cover the exposed bone. Without treatment, stage II MRONJ can progress to stage III, with orostoma, pathological fractures and extra-fistula.
The human amniotic membrane (hAM) has poor (even no) immunogenicity and exerts an anti-inflammatory, anti-fibrotic, antimicrobial, antiviral and analgesic effect. It is a source of multipotent stem cells and growth factors that promote tissue regeneration.
A pioneering, non-comparative study reports the use of hAM in MRONJ with very encouraging results in terms of re-epithelialization, absence of pain and infection (Ragazzo 2018). Recently, the same team published a retrospective study where 49 patients (stage 1 to 3) were included, including 27 treated with hAM (Ragazzo 2021). They report a significant improvement in quality of life and pain in the treated group.
hAM would provide a new approach in the treatment of stage II MRONJ by acting on: the quality and speed of mucosal healing, pain, even infection and regeneration of the underlying bone.
This study aims to demonstrate, during the first standard surgical management of patients with stage II MRONJ, the effect of the implantation of a cryopreserved hAM on the maxillomandibular bone, on the healing of the oral mucosa three months after the operation.
In second objectives will be evaluated: pain, complications at the site of healing of the mucosa (erythema, abscess, purulent discharge, diffuse infection of soft tissues (cellulitis), orostoma, suborbital abscess, mandibular fracture), oral health -dental/quality of life and new bone formation at subsequent visits.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Application of human amniotic membrane (hAM)
After conventional/standard treatment, hAM will be applied in a single layer against the bone defect before closure.
Human Amniotic Membrane
After conventional/standard treatment, hAM will be applied in a single layer against the bone defect with, if possible, a burial of a few millimeters under the mucous edges.
With the idea of apprehending a possible dose effect, the hAM will be adapted to the size of the bone/mucous defect, mesenchymal side against the bone.
For closure after hAM grafting : 2 options are possible:
Edge-to-edge closure if sufficient mucosal laxity, Edge rapprochement by cross points. If necessary: possible incision of the periosteum to give laxity to the mucosa.
Conventional/standard treatment
Conventional/standard surgery.
Conventional/Standard treatment
Surgical procedure: Endo-oral approach:
* Trimming of the mucous edges if they are necrotic or inflamed (granulation tissue)
* For the bone: either simple sequestrectomy (the mobile sequestered bone is grabbed using forceps); either reaming until bleeding is obtained; either resection with the rongeur; either monobloc resection of the entire necrotic fragment with a saw or with a piezzotome (ultrasound); or a combination of different techniques. Rq: the resection of the necrotic bone (according to the practices of the center) will operate until the appearance of an "apparently healthy" bone (bone bleeding, clean appearance of the bone site)
* Closure of the mucosa with possible incision of the periosteum to provide laxity: Suture points by points separated in one plane with non-absorbable braided thread of the 3.0 "silk thread" type and round needle.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Human Amniotic Membrane
After conventional/standard treatment, hAM will be applied in a single layer against the bone defect with, if possible, a burial of a few millimeters under the mucous edges.
With the idea of apprehending a possible dose effect, the hAM will be adapted to the size of the bone/mucous defect, mesenchymal side against the bone.
For closure after hAM grafting : 2 options are possible:
Edge-to-edge closure if sufficient mucosal laxity, Edge rapprochement by cross points. If necessary: possible incision of the periosteum to give laxity to the mucosa.
Conventional/Standard treatment
Surgical procedure: Endo-oral approach:
* Trimming of the mucous edges if they are necrotic or inflamed (granulation tissue)
* For the bone: either simple sequestrectomy (the mobile sequestered bone is grabbed using forceps); either reaming until bleeding is obtained; either resection with the rongeur; either monobloc resection of the entire necrotic fragment with a saw or with a piezzotome (ultrasound); or a combination of different techniques. Rq: the resection of the necrotic bone (according to the practices of the center) will operate until the appearance of an "apparently healthy" bone (bone bleeding, clean appearance of the bone site)
* Closure of the mucosa with possible incision of the periosteum to provide laxity: Suture points by points separated in one plane with non-absorbable braided thread of the 3.0 "silk thread" type and round needle.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patient treated in the context of a tumor pathology during which he received treatment with bisphosphonates, Denosumab or anti-angiogenics, and/or, very often, switch of treatment or combination. Current treatment or mention of treatment in patient history
* MRONJ stage II certified clinically and radiologically. Also in the maxilla, stage II MRONJ without bucco-sinus communication after excision of the necrotic bone. Similarly, if a tooth with antral roots must be extracted and creates a bucco-sinus communication, if a MRONJ results, it will be stage II
* Patients with stage II MRONJ of childbearing age with current contraception or patients already postmenopausal
* Signature of the informed consent to participate indicating that the subject has understood the purpose and the procedures required by the study, that he agrees to participate in the study as well as to comply with the requirements and restrictions inherent in this study
* Affiliation to a French social security scheme or beneficiary of such a scheme
* Life expectancy of less than 6 months assessed by oncologists
* Existence of an evolving cervico-facial neoplasia or an evolving oral neoplastic process informed by oncologists
* History of oral and/or cervico-facial radiotherapy
* Allergy to one of these two antibiotics: amoxicillin-clavulanic acid or clindamycin-metronidazole combination
* Patient contraindicated for surgery due to his state of health, with general anesthesia or local anesthesia.
* MRONJ stage I and stage III
* Stage II MRONJ in patients with only osteoporosis
* Patients receiving treatments that may affect bone and/or mucous tissue as well as their metabolism: Patients on long-term corticosteroid therapy or immunosuppressants
* Patients with other diseases that may affect bone and/or mucous tissue as well as their metabolism: Bone diseases (such as brittle bone disease or Osteogenesis imperfecta, primary bone tumors in the maxilla or mandible (osteosarcoma, sarcoma, rhabdomyosarcoma ,…), any other malignant bone tumour; metabolic diseases with bone repercussions (Paget's disease, osteomalacia,…)
* Patients of childbearing age without contraception
* Legal incapacity or limited legal capacity
* Subject unlikely to cooperate in the study and/or low cooperation anticipated by the investigator
* Subject not affiliated to a social security scheme
* Patient under guardianship, curatorship or imprisonment
* Patient who notified his refusal to participate in the research
* Patient who participates in another clinical research
Exclusion Criteria
* During surgery: Following a sequestrectomy discovery of spontaneous or ongoing healing.
* During the inclusion period: Patient to benefit from invasive "dental" surgeries directly related to bone exposure and in conjunction with taking risky molecules (factors favoring the occurrence of MRONJ): dental avulsions, curettage apical granulomas or cysts, endodontic treatments, or alveolar bone procedure (regularization of ridges).
* During the inclusion period: Patient with metastases all over the mandible.
* During the inclusion period: State of health of the patient which deteriorates due to his cancer during the inclusion period.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Besancon
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Aurélien LOUVRIER, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
CHU de Besançon
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
CHU de Besancon
Besançon, , France
CHU Bordeaux Pellegrin
Bordeaux, , France
CHU de Dijon
Dijon, , France
CHR Metz Thionville
Metz, , France
CHU de Reims
Reims, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2021/584
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.