Application of Multitask Deep Learning Model in Grading the Severity of Spinal Facet Joint Degeneration
NCT ID: NCT05635006
Last Updated: 2025-08-13
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
1132 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2022-12-31
2026-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Multivariate Analysis and Machine Learning Model Risk Prediction of Recurrent Pain After PLIF Surgery for Degenerative Lumbar Spine Disease At Long-term Follow-up
NCT06622356
Deep-learning Based Classification of Spine CT
NCT03790930
Development and Validation of Interpretable Machine Learning Models Incorporating Paraspinal Muscle Quality for to Predict Cage Subsidence Risk Followingposterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion
NCT06888739
The Study of INTRA Spine Non Fusion Technique in the Treatment of Lumbar Degenerative Disease
NCT06075966
Application Value of Deep Learning in Diagnosis of Cervical Spondylosis
NCT04952233
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
This study plans to include 1,132 patients from a single center, who will be randomly divided into a training set, a validation set, and a test set according to the proportion for automatic diagnosis by the computer deep learning model, aiming to test the stability and reliability of the model. Among these 1,132 patients, two doctors separately conducted graded image reading for joint stenosis, hypertrophy, osteophytes, articular surface erosion, and subchondral cysts. Controversial results were determined by another more experienced doctor, and results of the reference standard group were confirmed by the senior doctor group. The data analysis methods for other centers were consistent with those described above.
By comparing the diagnostic results of clinicians and the model, the performance and clinical feasibility of the deep learning model for the automatic diagnosis of lumbar facet joint degeneration were evaluated. The doctors' judgment results were compared with the model's prediction results, and statistical analysis was performed on the performance of the model's automatic diagnosis. Performance evaluation indicators included accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, precision, recall, F1 score, and AUC value. Among them, F1 score and AUC value are the main indicators for the comprehensive evaluation of model performance; the higher their values, the stronger the model performance.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
OTHER
RETROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Training group
70% of the participants were randomly divided into training groups to train the learning performance of the machine
No special intervention, randomly classify the subjects
Validation group
15% of the participants were randomly divided into validation groups to enhance the learning performance of the machine and avoid over fitting
No special intervention, randomly classify the subjects
Test group
15% of the participants were randomly divided into test groups to test the learning performance of the machine and draw research conclusions
No special intervention, randomly classify the subjects
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
No special intervention, randomly classify the subjects
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Hai Lv
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Hai Lv
Chief physician
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
The fifth affiliated hospital of SYSU
Zhuhai, Guangdong, China
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
ZDWY.JZWK.004
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.