Symptoms Control and adhErenCe Assessment During Treatment With MepolizUmab New pREfilled Devices

NCT ID: NCT05626777

Last Updated: 2024-11-18

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

20 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-03-09

Study Completion Date

2026-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Asthma is a common pathology, with a prevalence of 6 to 8% and more than 4 million patients in France. Its management is based on different therapeutic axes. Their use is very dependent on disease control, with therapeutic escalation, from treatment on demand to a combination of them at high dosage, according to the severe asthma's phenotype.

Despite these effective therapeutic tools, there is a lack of control of the disease in the vast majority of cases, affecting at least 60% of asthmatics. Among the factors associated with lack of control, non-compliance with inhaled therapies is frequent and requires to be systematically assessed in the absence of control.

Its evaluation by definition is complex and variously appreciated, fluctuating from 40 to 80%. The means proposed for evaluating it involve doctor/patient interviews, evaluation of the therapeutic response, questionnaires, evaluation of drug consumption (evaluation of number of empty boxes, integrated electronic device, withdrawal of drugs from pharmacies, etc).

Asthma control is commonly evaluated using the validated Asthma Control Test score, in clinical practice and/or in research fields. An ACT score greater than 20 indicates well-controlled asthma. In addition, a change of at least 3 points is likely to indicate a clinically meaningful change in asthma control (Minimally Clinical Important Difference) in an individual patient over time and a change of 4 points or more further reduces the risk that the change is due to measurement error.

In the context of severe eosinophilic asthma, Mepolizumab has shown its benefit in controlling asthma, reducing the number of exacerbations and its ability to decrease the use of oral corticosteroids (MENSA, SIRIUS).

Mepolizumab is now available in 2 new "ready-to-use" forms: a pre-filled syringe and an auto-injector pen. Both systems can be administered at home either by a nurse or by the patient himself (self-administration). The choice is left to the discretion of the prescribing pulmonologist.

These new possibilities of Mepolizumab administration offer greater freedom to the patient, possibly allowing him to empower himself by carrying out his own treatment, without constraint and without being dependent on the availability of a nurse or another healthcare professional qualified to inject Mepolizumab.

These new methods of Mepolizumab self- administration also open the field to therapeutic non-compliance, a new problem in the field of biotherapies used for the treatment of severe asthma.

The investigator hypothesize a potential therapeutic non-compliance associated with the new method of administration of Mepolizumab, with self-injection by the patient, without the assistance of a nurse.

To assess this problem, the investigator propose to compare in a therapeutic trial Mepolizumab administered by pre-filled syringe by a home nurse every month versus Mepolizumab self-administered by auto-injector pen by the patient every month.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Asthma

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Pre-filled syringe, mepolizumab 100 mg/month

Pre-filled syringe, mepolizumab, 100 mg/month, 6 first months of treatment administered by nurse, 6 last months of treatment administered by patient

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Pre-filled syringe, mepolizumab 100 mg/month

Intervention Type DRUG

Pre-filled syringe, mepolizumab, 100 mg/month, 6 first months of treatment administered by nurse, 6 last months of treatment administered by patient

Auto-injector pen, mepolizumab 100 mg/month

Auto-injector pen, mepolizumab, 100 mg/month 12 months of treatment administered by patient

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Auto-injector pen, mepolizumab 100 mg/month

Intervention Type DRUG

Auto-injector pen, mepolizumab, 100 mg/month 12 months of treatment administered by patient

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Pre-filled syringe, mepolizumab 100 mg/month

Pre-filled syringe, mepolizumab, 100 mg/month, 6 first months of treatment administered by nurse, 6 last months of treatment administered by patient

Intervention Type DRUG

Auto-injector pen, mepolizumab 100 mg/month

Auto-injector pen, mepolizumab, 100 mg/month 12 months of treatment administered by patient

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Patient aged ≥ 18 years
2. Severe asthma diagnosed by a pulmonologist and followed for at least a year
3. Blood eosinophilia ≥ 0.15 G / L in the 12 months preceding inclusion in the trial.
4. At least 2 exacerbations in the past 12 months, each time treated with oral corticosteroid therapy or an increase in dosage of oral corticosteroid therapy prescribed for a long time, for at least 72 hours.
5. High dose inhaled corticosteroid therapy (\> 800 μg / d budesonide,\> 500 μg / d fluticasone,\> 1000 μg / d beclometasone, etc.) and at least one second controller asthma treatment with Long-Acting Beta-Agonists or Long-Acting Muscarinic Antagonists
6. Patient must have an efficient contraception method
7. Patient affiliated to a social security scheme.
8. Patient able to give free, informed and written consent.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Pregnant woman (urinary beta-HCG positive at inclusion) or breastfeeding
2. Active smoking or ex-smoking for less than 6 months and more than 10 pack-years
3. Exacerbation in the 4 weeks preceding first Mepolizumab injection
4. Patient who has already been treated with Mepolizumab or another anti-IL-5 or -5R treatment
5. Patient currently using a biotherapy indicated in severe asthma other than anti-IL5 or 5R treatments or stopped for less than 2 months
6. Treatment underway with another biotherapy not indicated for severe asthma
7. Patient participating in other interventional research, excluding routine care research (old regulation) and category 2 research not interfering with primary endpoint analysis
8. Other chronic respiratory pathology (bronchiectasis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, pulmonary fibrosis, etc.)
9. Any other uncontrolled chronic pathology, the presence of which would be considered incompatible with the performance of the study by the investigator
10. Patient under guardianship, curatorship or legal protection
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

GlaxoSmithKline

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Hospices Civils de Lyon

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Gilles Devouassoux, Pr

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Departement of Pulmonology, Croix-Rousse Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Service de Pneumologie CHU Besançon

Besançon, , France

Site Status

Service de Pneumologie CHU Dijon

Dijon, , France

Site Status

Service de Pneumologie et ImmunoAllergologie CHU Lille

Lille, , France

Site Status

Departement of Pulmonology, Croix-Rousse Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon

Lyon, , France

Site Status

Service des Maladies Respiratoires CHU Montpellier

Montpellier, , France

Site Status

Service de Pneumologie A APHP Bichat

Paris, , France

Site Status

Service des Maladies Respiratoires CHU Reims

Reims, , France

Site Status

Service de Pneumologie CHU Toulouse

Toulouse, , France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2022-501029-19-00

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

69HCL21_0419

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.