Dupilumab for Severe Asthma in a Real Life Setting

NCT ID: NCT04022447

Last Updated: 2019-08-06

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

86 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-08-10

Study Completion Date

2019-04-02

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Dupilumab is a monoclonal anti-IL-4/13Rα antibody developed for severe asthma (SA). In France, mepolizumab was commercialized in February 2018. Before this date, many SA patients had reached a therapeutic dead end, with uncontrolled disease despite maximal available treatment. Upon the request of lung specialists involved in SA, French health authorities approved an early access program (temporary Use Authorization) allowing early access to dupilumab (before EMA's decision) from September 2017 to January 2018, for SA patients demonstrating unacceptable steroids side effects and/or life-threatening exacerbations, irrespective of their T2 status.The aim of this retrospective study was to describe the characteristics of SA patients included in the early access program and to assess changes in asthma control after a 12 months treatment.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Introduction:

Asthma is a worldwide burden affecting more than 300 millions patients. Although the vast majority of asthma patients suffer from mild to moderate diseases whose symptoms can be assessed with inhaled corticosteroids (CSI) and bronchodilators, 3.7% of them present with severe asthma (SA). SA is defined as an asthma remaining uncontrolled despite adherence with maximal optimized therapy and treatment of contributory factors, or that worsens when high dose treatment is decreased. SA represents a small proportion of patients but the very heart of the asthma problem with tremendous health costs, high morbidity and significant mortality. Thus it has been the center of therapeutic research interest for the past decade and different treatments have achieved development and reglementary approvals. Among them, dupilumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody targeting the alpha subunit of the interleukin 4 receptor, blocking both IL-4 and IL -13 pathways. It is therefore interacting with the type 2 inflammation response observed in eosinophilic asthma. The French Ministry of Health therefore opened a window of appeals for TUA from September 2017 to January 2018, allowing early access to dupilumab for SA patients demonstrating unacceptable steroids side effects and/or life-threatening exacerbations, irrespective of their T2 status. By that time indeed, phase 3 randomized clinical trials (RCT) on eosinophilic patients had not yet been published.

In this phase IV real-life study with no placebo group, the investigators aimed to describe patients' characteristics and to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Dupilumab on non-selected SA patients.

Method:

This multicenter retrospective observational real-life study was conducted at 13 public teaching hospitals across the country. All French SA patients who received dupilumab under the TUA between September 2017 and January 2018 were included in the survey, as long as they had received at least one injection and completed at least one follow-up visit in the first 12 months of treatment. No inclusion criteria were required, but patients' files had previously been screened through by health authorities and validated by Sanofi to allow dupilumab TUA. Physicians had had to certify that patients had SA with no other treatment available at that time, and that poor asthma control and/or severe steroid side effects required scaling up treatment. Patients were not required to have eosinophilia. However, patients were excluded from the TUA if they presented with previous hypereosinophilia \> 1500/mm3, as symptomatic hypereosinophilia has previously been described with dupilumab in this particular population.

Investigators were free to decide on the frequency of visits, blood tests and function assessments, as to define the tools of control assessment, in adequacy with their usual practice. On line and paper questionnaires were retrospectively filled.

Main objective of the study was to describe asthma control at 12 months and secondary objectives were descriptive data of the population, efficacy, safety and tolerability of dupilumab treatment. Statistics of patients' characteristics were compiled. Efficacy was assessed in the per-protocol population, defined as all the patients who completed visits at 3, 6 and/or 12 months. Differences between baseline and follow-up visits were compared by Wilcoxon signed-rank test and rank-sum test. ACT evolution during study was assessed with a mixed linear model.

Response was eventually assessed by each investigator using the GETE score (5 categories, graded from 1 to 5, respectively defining the disease control as excellent - good - moderate - poor and worsening). Categories 1 and 2 are considered as good response.

Clinical response was defined as gain of ACT score of more than 5 points compared to previous assessment or ACT \> 18. Time to first clinical response was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier curves.

Safety and tolerability were evaluated on the basis of each investigator notifications The protocol was approved by the institutional review boards of the French learned society for respiratory medicine - Société de Pneumologie de Langue Française and of the Paris University Hospitals - Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris. The independent Committee for the protection of persons (CPP) gave a favourable opinion. All patients provided oral consent to the collection of their data. As a non interventional retrospective study, no written consent was required.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Severe Asthma

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

OTHER

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Dupilumab

retrospective data collection

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

retrospective non interventional

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* French patient with Severe Asthma
* Administration of dupilumab under the TUA between September 2017 and January 2018, with at least one injection
* Realization of at least one follow-up visit in the first 12 months of treatment

Exclusion Criteria

None
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Camille TAILLE, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Bichat-Claude Bernard University Hospital

Paris, , France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Dupin C, Belhadi D, Guilleminault L, Gamez AS, Berger P, De Blay F, Bonniaud P, Leroyer C, Mahay G, Girodet PO, Raherison C, Fry S, Le Bourdelles G, Proust A, Rosencher L, Garcia G, Bourdin A, Chenivesse C, Didier A, Couffignal C, Taille C. Effectiveness and safety of dupilumab for the treatment of severe asthma in a real-life French multi-centre adult cohort. Clin Exp Allergy. 2020 Jul;50(7):789-798. doi: 10.1111/cea.13614. Epub 2020 May 29.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 32469092 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

HAO 18053

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Dupilumab Compassionate Use Study
NCT03020810 APPROVED_FOR_MARKETING