Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
245 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2022-11-24
2023-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
1. Determination of the prevalence of impaired hypoglycemia awareness (IAH) in adult patients with type 1 diabetes in the Polish population.
2. Assessment of the clinical usefulness of commonly used standardized scales for the assessment of IAH.
3. Determination of the clinical factors associated with the occurrence of impaired hypoglycemia awareness in adult patients with type 1 diabetes.
4. Determination of the relationship between the occurrence of IAH and the diagnosis of cardiac autonomic neuropathy.
5. Determination of the relationship between impaired hypoglycemia awareness in adult patients with type 1 diabetes and the occurrence of cognitive impairment.
Participants will:
* fill the standard questionnaires regarding hypoglycemia awareness: Gold, Clarck, HypoA-Q.
* have late complications of diabetes checked
* have procedure of cardiac autonomic neuropathy assessment
* have standard laboratory evaluation during hospitalization
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Restoration of Hypoglycemia Awareness With Home-based High Intensity Interval Training
NCT04825366
Effect of Hypoglycaemia on Social Cognition and Cardiac Conduction
NCT02347553
Effects of Structured Group Education on Quality of Life and Glycemic Control in Type 1 Diabetes
NCT02443532
Clinical Efficacy of a Diabetes Educational Program to Improve Flash Adherence in Type 1 Diabetes Patients
NCT05570162
Pilot Feasibility Study for HypoPals, a Mobile Health Program for Improving Hypoglycemia Management.
NCT05916131
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Common episodes of hypoglycemia can lead to disturbances in the development and maturation of neurons, resulting in cognitive impairment, structural changes in the central nervous system, lower levels of intellectual abilities, and behavioral disturbances. MRI studies in patients with T1D and IAH showed brain changes including gray matter and white matter. These changes correlate with the frequency of severe hypoglycemia and, in some areas of the brain, with the severity of IAH.
Hypoglycemia unawareness may also be due to the presence of diabetic cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy (CAN). CAN is an established factor associated with severe hypoglycemia. By reducing the catecholamine counter-regulatory response to hypoglycemia as well as the severity of autonomic warning symptoms, CAN may contribute to IAH. The American Diabetes Association (ADA) recommends screening for CAN in patients with impaired hypoglycemia awareness. However, the relationship between CAN and IAH has not been well established. Few data suggested CAN as a possible cause of IAH, however, further studies in patients with T1D ruled out the association of CAN with IAH. Olsen et al. assessed the relationship of IAH with the presence of CAN and peripheral neuropathy in a group of 66 patients with a 31-year history of T1D. The study showed that adults with IAH compared to the control group (adults with T1D without IAH) did not differ in the incidence of CAN and peripheral neuropathy. Paes et al. in the group of 98 patients with a 13-year duration of CT1 also observed no difference in the incidence of CAN among patients with IAH compared to those with T1D without IAH. However, they confirmed the relationship between age, diabetes duration, number of severe hypoglycemic episodes, and creatinine clearance with IAH. Patients with IAH had a longer T1D duration and lower creatinine clearance compared to the control group. Moreover, in people with impaired hypoglycemia awareness, the number of severe hypoglycemia episodes was higher compared to those with normal hypoglycemia.
A simple and widely used method of assessing hypoglycemia awareness is the use of validated questionnaires in which patients report specific situations in their life related to hypoglycemia. Four questionnaires are known to diagnose awareness of hypoglycemia: Gold, Clarke, Pedersen-Bjergaard, and HypoA-Q. The advantage of using the above-mentioned questionnaires as a method of assessing hypoglycemia awareness is non-invasiveness, no / minimal cost, reporting experiences from actual episodes of hypoglycemia, the possibility of use in large patient populations, and the possibility of clinical application.
Identifying the factors that influence IAH could help draw attention to patients at risk of its consequences. Then, they could undergo hypoglycemia training, education to optimize insulin dosing, or stricter control, e.g. thanks to the use of continuous glucose monitoring systems.
Methods:
Observational, single-center study
1. Inclusion of 245 consecutive patients (women and men over 18 years of age) with type 1 diabetes, with disease duration\> 10 years, hospitalized at the Department of Internal Medicine and Diabetology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences
2. Assessment of the level of hypoglycemia awareness using standardized questionnaires: HYPOA-Q, Clarke, Gold. These are the three most commonly used scales for assessing the IAH. The endpoint, i.e. impaired hypoglycemic awareness, will be any abnormal result in one of the following scales indicating IAH (HYPOA-Q score above the median in the study population, Gold and Clarke ≥ 4)
3. Evaluated factors from the history - age, duration of diabetes, smoking, physical activity, number of severe hypoglycemia and diabetic ketoacidosis in life, partial clinical remission after diagnosis of diabetes, presence of comorbidities (hypertension, hypercholesterolemia), number of hours of sleep, shift work, method of insulin therapy used by the patient, A1c values from the history of the last 5 years.
4. Assessment of glycemic control from reports from continuous glucose monitoring systems and glucometers - number of hypoglycemic episodes \<54 and ≤70 mg / dL in the last 4 weeks (meter reading) or duration of hypoglycemia, mean glycemia and parameters of glucose variability
5. Daily dose of insulin
6. Anthropometric measurements: body weight, height, waist and hip circumference, body weight composition
7. Laboratory tests: performed on an empty stomach, collecting about 8 ml of venous blood and a urine sample of 50-100 ml. These are tests routinely performed in the hospital to assess metabolic control in type 1 diabetes.
8. Study of the accumulation of advanced glycation products in tissues based on the level of skin autofluorescence
9. Montreal Cognitive Assessment Scale - a tool for screening the assessment of mild cognitive impairment. The 10-minute test allows you to assess attention and concentration, executive functions, memory, language, visual and spatial functions, conceptual thinking, calculation skills and orientation. The maximum number of points that can be obtained is 30. A score below 26 points suggests a cognitive impairment.
10. Hypoglycemia Fear Survey - questionnaire assessing fear of hypoglycemia in the last four weeks.
11. Tests for the presence of chronic complications of diabetes mellitus: diabetic retinopathy, diabetic kidney disease, peripheral neuropathy, and cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy:
Expected results:
1. In the opinion of experts, the prevalence of IAH in the Polish population in adult patients with type 1 diabetes with disease duration over 10 years is estimated at least 20%. We assume N = (the literature says that there may be about 3.5 million diabetic patients in Poland, of which about 10% is DM1), therefore N = 35,000, then I assume that the fraction p = 20% and the significance level p = 0.05 and the permissible estimation error e = 5%, therefore the minimum necessary number is n = 245.
2. The scales used to assess IAH have different clinical utilities. The HYPOA-Q scale allows us to recognize the problem of IAH in more patients (higher sensitivity).
3. Determination of clinical factors independently related to the incidence of IAH. Expected independent factors related to IAH are age, disease duration, lifetime number of severe hypoglycemia and diabetic ketoacidosis, duration of hypoglycemia or number of hypoglycemia in the last 4 weeks, and macroangiopathy.
4. Determination of the relationship between the occurrence of IAH and the diagnosis of cardiac autonomic neuropathy. Expected confirmation of the existence of such a relationship.
5. Confirmation of the relationship between impaired hypoglycemia awareness in adult patients with type 1 diabetes and the occurrence of cognitive impairment.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
CROSS_SECTIONAL
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Type 1 diabetes
Type 1 diabetes \> 10 years duration of diabetes
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Duration of diabetes \> 10 years
* Consent to participate in the study
Exclusion Criteria
* Duration of diabetes\> 10 years
* Neurodegenerative diseases (Parkinson's disease, Alzheimer's disease, Huntington's disease)
* Multiple sclerosis
* Mental disorders
* Pregnancy
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Poznan University of Medical Sciences
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Aleksandra Araszkiewicz
Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Aleksandra Araszkiewicz
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Poznan University of Medical Sciences
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Poznan University of Medical Sciences
Poznan, , Poland
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
795/22
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.