Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
94 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-07-14
2025-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Hypothesis 1: The investigators hypothesize that participants with higher daily step counts and physical activity levels will report significantly less pain intensity from orthodontic separators than their less active peers following separator placement. Null hypothesis is that participants with higher daily step counts will report the same pain intensity from orthodontic separators than their less active peers following separator placement
The secondary aim is to describe the course of pain, at 24 hr intervals, over the next seven days following separator placement.
Hypothesis 2: The investigators hypothesize that more physically active participants will report ratings of zero pain intensity faster (sooner) than their less active peers throughout the one week study. Secondary null hypothesis is that more physically active participants will report ratings of zero pain intensity at the same rate as their less active peers throughout the one week study.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Effect of Low-level Laser Therapy to Reduce Pain Caused by Orthodontic Separators: A Randomized, Double-blind Place-bo-controlled, Split-mouth Study
NCT06816537
Orthodontic Pain Alleviation With Chewing Gum
NCT07210697
Effect of Laser Application in Pain Management Following the Use of Orthodontic Elastomeric Separators
NCT02209818
A Comparative Assessment of Post Extraction Pain in Orthodontic Patients to Evaluate the Effects of Early Engagement of Tooth with Orthodontic Wires. a Single Center Randomized Clinical Trial (RCT)
NCT06582836
Impact of Photobiomodulation on Pain Associated With Orthodontic Treatment
NCT06289595
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Numerous studies have shown that pain varies in intensity and duration among orthodontic patients. The placement of orthodontic separators is a standard procedure to facilitate placement of orthodontic bands by creating a small amount of space between posterior teeth. Separator placement reliably produces acute discomfort to patients. Pain generated from orthodontic separator placement originates in the periodontal ligament (PDL) as compression forces are applied to the PDL unequally to open a small space (less than 0.5 mm) between the teeth. This compression triggers sterile necrosis or hyalinization in some areas of the PDL, leading to acute pain. The course of pain generated from orthodontic separators typically begins 4 hours after placement, reaching highest pain intensity approximately 24 hours after placement, and continuing to decrease in intensity until returning to pre-placement baseline after seven days.
Variation in reported pain intensity across orthodontic patients is of interest to any practitioner who desires to improve patient outcomes. In an attempt to enhance the orthodontist ability to understand pain and its predicting factors, researchers have examined pain from orthodontic treatment relative to patient demographics, personality traits, psychological factors, perceived need and attitude toward treatment, among others. Okeson asserts that pain is not directly related to the extent of tissue injury. Noxious stimuli originating in peripheral neurons (such is the case with separators) are subject to modulation at multiple levels through a complex central inhibitory system, where many other factors participate in decreasing or increasing the pain experience. Hence, an individual's emotional state, pain expectation and perception of control, as well as activities or distractions that will differ brain attention (Gate Control) can significantly influence the pain experience. Perceived stress, or the degree to which situations in an individual's life exceed their ability to cope, could be a good predictor of experienced pain. The Perceived Stress Scale is the most widely used screening form to evaluate perceived stress and asks subjects to recall the frequency of feeling overloaded and overwhelmed in the past month.
Recently, more attention has been given to the role of physical activity (PA) in reducing pain in patients that undergo orthodontic treatment. Physical activity has been shown to be an effective mediator of acute pain tolerance and pain sensitivity, an effect known as Exercise Induced Hypoalgesia (EIH). One study reported that a 1-mile run decreased pain intensity evoked from a weight being placed on the index finger. A similar decrease in pain response to pressure applied to the finger was found in subjects in another study who performed 30 minutes of aerobic exercise. It has also been demonstrated that exercise increased dental pain thresholds in response to electrical stimulation of the pulp. The exact mechanism involved in EIH remains elusive. Still, several pathways have been implicated including activation of the endogenous opioid pathway, increased Adrenocorticotropic Hormone release, and a conditioned pain the pain perceived in another area of the body.
Researchers have demonstrated that higher self-reported physical activity reduced the pain levels generated by placement of orthodontic separators when compared to patients with low physical activity. Self-reported measurements of physical activity carry limitations. The Physical Activity Questionnaire (PAQ) used in previous studies have demonstrated an only moderate correlation with direct activity observation (r=0.45), and with an activity monitoring device (r=0.57). The PAQ asks participants to report pain in the last seven days, and if given before treatment was performed, provides no data on physical activity during the week when subjects are experiencing pain. To further explore the correlation between physical activity and acute pain during orthodontic treatment, a more reliable measure of physical activity is warranted.
Actigraphy sensors provide an objective measure of physical activity. Actigraphy sensors include pedometers, which count steps over a defined time interval, and accelerometers, which measure acceleration in "activity counts" that are then extrapolated to the Metabolic Equivalent of Task (METS) to measure energy expenditure. No other paper has evaluated the effect of physical activity measured with pedometers on acute pain following separators placement during orthodontic treatment. Because not all patients experience pain at the same level, it would be beneficial for clinicians to identify which patients are likely to experience more intense pain before beginning treatment. To this end, the purpose of this study is to test the effect of physical activity measured by pedometer on acute pain produced by the placement of separators.
Protocol amended to include minors aged 15-17.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
Activity monitors will be provided and participants instructed to wear 24/7 unless showering or swimming to measure and collect level of physical activity
Baseline data will be collected via questionnaires that include: Medical History, Demographics, and Perceived Stress Scale.
Subjects will also complete a Recurrent Questionnaire at 2-4 hrs post placement and every evening for days 2-7 to report Pain Intensity using a Visual Analog Scale
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Orthodontic Separators Placed
Elastomeric separators will be placed on the mesial and distal of the lower first permanent molars for a total of four separators per subject.
Pain Intensity following Placement of Orthodontic Separators
Elastomeric separators will be placed on the mesial and distal of lower first permanent molars for a total of four separators per subject. Subjects will wear receive an activity monitor prior to placement of elastic separators and instructed to wear it 24/7 unless showering or swimming. Subjects will complete a recurrent Pain Scale Questionnaire 2-4 hrs after placement of elastics and every 24 hrs from day 2- 7.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Pain Intensity following Placement of Orthodontic Separators
Elastomeric separators will be placed on the mesial and distal of lower first permanent molars for a total of four separators per subject. Subjects will wear receive an activity monitor prior to placement of elastic separators and instructed to wear it 24/7 unless showering or swimming. Subjects will complete a recurrent Pain Scale Questionnaire 2-4 hrs after placement of elastics and every 24 hrs from day 2- 7.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Aged 15-49 at time of enrollment in the study
* Erupted permanent first and second molars with interproximal contacts
* Presence of antagonist teeth in the opposite arch with no open bite
* Voluntary participation in study
* Access to a smartphone, tablet, or computer
* Valid email address
Exclusion Criteria
* Current use of pain medication (analgesics, opioids, nerve pain medications) for any condition
* Clinically evident interproximal decay in the site where separators will be placed
* Missing teeth, variations in tooth anatomy, existing space, and or restorations that would keep separators from being placed or retained
* If you do not have access to a computer, smartphone, or tablet with internet access
15 Years
49 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Lina Sharab
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Lina Sharab
Assistant Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Lina Sharab, DDS, MS, MSc
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Assistant Professor, Orthodontics
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Kentucky
Lexington, Kentucky, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Bergius M, Berggren U, Kiliaridis S. Experience of pain during an orthodontic procedure. Eur J Oral Sci. 2002 Apr;110(2):92-8. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0722.2002.11193.x.
Sergl HG, Klages U, Zentner A. Pain and discomfort during orthodontic treatment: causative factors and effects on compliance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998 Dec;114(6):684-91. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(98)70201-x.
Abu Alhaija ES, Aldaikki A, Al-Omairi MK, Al-Khateeb SN. The relationship between personality traits, pain perception and attitude toward orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthod. 2010 Nov;80(6):1141-9. doi: 10.2319/012710-59.1.
Beck VJ, Farella M, Chandler NP, Kieser JA, Thomson WM. Factors associated with pain induced by orthodontic separators. J Oral Rehabil. 2014 Apr;41(4):282-8. doi: 10.1111/joor.12144. Epub 2014 Feb 1.
Campos LA, Santos-Pinto A, Maroco J, Campos JADB. Pain perception in orthodontic patients: A model considering psychosocial and behavioural aspects. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2019 Aug;22(3):213-221. doi: 10.1111/ocr.12315. Epub 2019 May 15.
Rakhshan H, Rakhshan V. Pain and discomfort perceived during the initial stage of active fixed orthodontic treatment. Saudi Dent J. 2015 Apr;27(2):81-7. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2014.11.002. Epub 2015 Jan 27.
Sandhu SS, Leckie G. Orthodontic pain trajectories in adolescents: Between-subject and within-subject variability in pain perception. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2016 Apr;149(4):491-500.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.10.020.
Sandhu SS, Sandhu J. Orthodontic pain: an interaction between age and sex in early and middle adolescence. Angle Orthod. 2013 Nov;83(6):966-72. doi: 10.2319/030113-174.1. Epub 2013 May 24.
Ngan P, Kess B, Wilson S. Perception of discomfort by patients undergoing orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1989 Jul;96(1):47-53. doi: 10.1016/0889-5406(89)90228-x.
Bondemark L, Fredriksson K, Ilros S. Separation effect and perception of pain and discomfort from two types of orthodontic separators. World J Orthod. 2004 Summer;5(2):172-6.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
55656
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.