Outcome After Conservatively Treated Achilles Tendon Rupture

NCT ID: NCT05614908

Last Updated: 2024-09-20

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION

Total Enrollment

220 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-11-01

Study Completion Date

2028-02-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The main purpose of the study is to compare the patient-reported outcomes and adverse events of two different rehabilitation regimes for patients undergoing non-surgical treatment of Achilles Tendon Rupture. Thus, using a pre-post study design we will compare whether patients participating in an 8-week liberal rehabilitation regime will achieve the same, or better, self- reported functional ability, without increased risk of adverse events, in the first two years following injury, compared to an 11 weeks more restrictive rehabilitation regime..

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Background:

The Achilles tendon is the most commonly injured tendon in the lower extremity, and can be treated either surgical or non-surgical. Previous studies have investigated early controlled motion and weight-bearing for non-surgically treated Achilles Tendon Rupture (ATR). Early motion may cause tendon elongation, which leads to decrease in push off strength, and thus potentially a poorer functional outcome. Conversely, delayed initiation of mobilisation and weight-bearing may similarly hinder or delay optimal recovery of function and return to work and sports. The correct treatment and rehabilitation, including the timing of rehabilitation initiation, may therefore be crucial to ensure the patients functional ability.

Most hospitals in Denmark treating patients with ATR, provide a regime of 8-9 weeks of treatment for non-surgically treated patients. At Aarhus University Hospital (AUH), however, a more restrictive regime has been provided for these patients in the past 7 years, with a treatment period of 11 weeks after injury, and with no or limited weight-bearing or exercises.

A previous retrospective study at AUH including 100 patients undergoing non-surgical treatment and the restrictive 11 week rehabilitation regime was conducted in 2023. The results documented a re-rupture rate of 4 %, comparable to the rate reported at the Danish ATR Database, and similarly comparable results on patient-reported disability measured with the Achilles tendon Total Rupture Score (ATRS). The Danish ATR Database includes data from 11 different hospitals in Denmark, where the majority have implemented a more liberal rehabilitation regime of 8-9 weeks of treatment with early weight-bearing and exercises. As a result of this retrospective study, we are changing the rehabilitation protocol of ATR at AUH, from 11 weeks restrictive regime, to an 8 weeks liberal regime.

Purpose:

With this quality assurance study we aim to compare patient-reported outcomes and adverse events in patients participating in an 8-week liberal regime compared to an 11-week restrictive regime following non-surgically treated ATR

Study design and setting:

This is an observational cohort study with prospectively collected patient-reported outcomes, conducted at AUH. First, 110 consecutive patients will be included while the existing 11-week restrictive regime is standard care, then the 8-week liberal regime will be implemented, and subsequently another 110 patients will be consecutively included.

Data collection procedures and outcomes:

Patients will receive a digital letter with a link to an online questionnaire to be completed at 6 months, 12 months and 24 months from the date of the treatment start.

Patients are asked to fill out the ATRS on functional ability, as well as additional questions regarding job status, return to sport, incidence of deep venous thrombosis, whether they have sustained a re-rupture, and their satisfaction with treatment they received at the hospital.

The ATRS is a 10-item questionnaire, with a score of 0 to 10 (worst-best), which has been found valid, reliable and responsive in this population.

Statistical analysis:

The primary outcome is the difference in the self-reported ATRS score at 12 months in patients participating in the 8-weeks regime compared to the 11-week regime.

The sample size needed to detect a minimal clinical important difference of 10 points (SD 18) between the two groups is 102, with a significance level of 5% and a power of 80%. To allow for subgroup analysis and with an estimated rate of drop-out of 20%, a minimum of 200 patients will be included.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Achilles Tendon Rupture Achilles Tendon Injury

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Patients with Achilles tendon rupture

Patients treated non-surgically at Aarhus University Hospital from 2022 to approximately 2028. Comparing an 8 week liberal regime wtih an 11 week restrictive regime.

11 week restrictive regime

Intervention Type OTHER

As part of standard care at AUH (until May 2024), patients are immobilized in scotch cast with the foot in plantarflexion during week 0-4. Next, the scotch cast is replaced by a ROM-WALKER in plantarflexion for the next 7 weeks (week 5-11 after injury). The ROM-WALKER is gradually corrected from 30 degrees plantarflexion to 0 degrees. No weight bearing or exercises is allowed and they are not allowed to remove the ROM-WALKER during week 0-10. At week 11, the patients are allowed weight bearing up to 30 kg, after which there is no longer weight bearing restrictions.

From week 12 they are allowed full weight bearing with a 1 cm heel lift i their shoes.

8 week liberal regime

Intervention Type OTHER

The patients are treated with a walker orthosis with 3 wedges in plantarflexion, during week 1-2 with no weight bearing and no exercises. After 2 weeks, the tendon will be examined, and if no defect in the tendon is detected by palpation, the patients will start partially weight bearing in week 3-5, and full weight-bearing week 6-8. They are instructed in unloaded exercises for the calf and anklejoint after 2 weeks, and loaded exercises (elastic) after 5 weeks, with a maximum position til 0 degrees in the anklejoint. Balancetraining and stationary bike training after 7 weeks. The wedges are removed one by one after 3, 5 and 7 weeks, respectively.

If there is a palpable defect in the tendon after 2 weeks, the patient must wait 1 week with partially weight bearing and exercises, and remove the wedges at 4, 5 and 7 weeks after the initiation of treatment.

From week 9, walking i their shoes with a 1 cm heel lift.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

11 week restrictive regime

As part of standard care at AUH (until May 2024), patients are immobilized in scotch cast with the foot in plantarflexion during week 0-4. Next, the scotch cast is replaced by a ROM-WALKER in plantarflexion for the next 7 weeks (week 5-11 after injury). The ROM-WALKER is gradually corrected from 30 degrees plantarflexion to 0 degrees. No weight bearing or exercises is allowed and they are not allowed to remove the ROM-WALKER during week 0-10. At week 11, the patients are allowed weight bearing up to 30 kg, after which there is no longer weight bearing restrictions.

From week 12 they are allowed full weight bearing with a 1 cm heel lift i their shoes.

Intervention Type OTHER

8 week liberal regime

The patients are treated with a walker orthosis with 3 wedges in plantarflexion, during week 1-2 with no weight bearing and no exercises. After 2 weeks, the tendon will be examined, and if no defect in the tendon is detected by palpation, the patients will start partially weight bearing in week 3-5, and full weight-bearing week 6-8. They are instructed in unloaded exercises for the calf and anklejoint after 2 weeks, and loaded exercises (elastic) after 5 weeks, with a maximum position til 0 degrees in the anklejoint. Balancetraining and stationary bike training after 7 weeks. The wedges are removed one by one after 3, 5 and 7 weeks, respectively.

If there is a palpable defect in the tendon after 2 weeks, the patient must wait 1 week with partially weight bearing and exercises, and remove the wedges at 4, 5 and 7 weeks after the initiation of treatment.

From week 9, walking i their shoes with a 1 cm heel lift.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients with an acute achilles tendon rupture treated non-surgically at AUH
* Treatment start maximum 14 days after time of rupture
* ≥18 years
* Understand and read Danish

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients who have not followed the regime at AUH (e.g. terminated use of the ROM- walker prematurely or similar)
* Bilateral ATR or rupture of the opposite in the treatmentperiod
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Aarhus University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Mette Frank Fenger

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Nanna Rolving, Ph.d.

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Aarhus University Hospital, Department of physiotherapy and occupational therapy

Per Gundtoft, Ph.d.

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Aarhus University Hospital, Department of Orthopaedics

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Aarhus University Hospital

Aarhus, , Denmark

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Denmark

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

AarhusUH-MFenger

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.