Clinical Prognostic Score to Predict Relapse in VL

NCT ID: NCT05602610

Last Updated: 2024-03-05

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Total Enrollment

741 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-02-03

Study Completion Date

2027-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This prospective cohort study has the aim to develop a prognostic tool to predict relapse in patients suffering from visceral leishmaniasis (VL) from VL endemic regions in Ethiopia.

Therefore, comprehensive clinical and laboratory characterization of all confirmed VL patients before and during treatment will be performed in order to identify the factors that determine prognosis of the patients. This approach would result in more efficient patient care and would reduce the case fatality and morbidity, and improve follow-up and care for those at risk of VL relapse.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Certain patient groups seem to be at higher risk of poor outcomes. Although the average case fatality rate was \<10% in Ethiopia , certain subgroups of VL patients are at significantly higher risk of dying, with case fatality rates as high as 39% when patients coinfected with HIV or sepsis. The host's immunocompetence appears to play a critical factor associated with disease development, severity, treatment success and disease relapse. Yet, a substantial group of immunocompetent patients also fail to respond well to treatment, or develop relapse after cure. Relapse is increasingly recognized as an important clinical challenge, with 10-15% estimated to develop relapse in the Ethiopian setting. Understanding which factors determine prognosis among VL patients is key in improving outcomes, as high-risk patients can be identified and receive additional monitoring, care, investigations or preferential treatment with safer or more effective drugs.

One of the strategies to improve patient outcome is identification of factors that determine the prognosis of a patient. These factors can be used in clinical decision tools to provide the most appropriate care for each patient. With the key prognostic factors, patients can be stratified in high and low risk of relapse, treatment failure and mortality and can be treated accordingly, providing intensive monitoring and/or treatment of comorbidities of high-risk patients and a more decentralized follow-up for low-risk patients. This approach would result in more efficient patient care and would reduce the case fatality and morbidity, and improve follow-up and care for those at risk of VL relapse.

No clinical tools for prediction of relapse and treatment failure currently exist. The existing clinical tools for predicting mortality developed so far have a fair accuracy but these tools could further be improved by using prognostic markers both before and during treatment and including more relevant parameters which were previously ignored, such as more laboratory parameters including coagulation profile, blood culture, immunological markers and more relevant clinical parameters such as sepsis and comorbidities.

This study will perform a comprehensive clinical and laboratory characterization of all confirmed VL patients before and during treatment with the main objective to develop a prognostic tool for unfavorable outcome among hospitalized patients. It is planned to develop tools of different complexity, geared towards the capacity of the health facility and also study the added effect of each variable in the tool. The data from this study will address a number of outstanding unanswered questions that could help to improve or standardize VL management.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Visceral Leishmaniasis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

VL patients

VL infected individuals residing in/ with travel history to VL-endemic areas in Northern Ethiopia

No intervention

Intervention Type OTHER

No intervention

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

No intervention

No intervention

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* clinically or parasitologically confirmed VL

Exclusion Criteria

* Age under 12 years
* VL patients already on treatment for 3 days or more
* Severe critical condition or other circumstances that make the study medically inadvisable
* Unlikely to adhere to follow up visits during the study period (e.g. patients who live or work very far away) AND not reachable by phone for follow-up information
* Pregnant or lactating woman
Minimum Eligible Age

12 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Gondar

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Institute of Tropical Medicine, Belgium

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Saskia van Henten, MD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Institute of Tropical Medicine Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium

Eleni Ayele, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Gondar

Gonder, , Ethiopia

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Ethiopia

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Saskia van Henten, MD

Role: CONTACT

+32(0)32476556

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Eleni Ayele

Role: primary

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

1544/21

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.