Effect of Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing Therapy 2.0 Online Group Protocol
NCT ID: NCT05596903
Last Updated: 2023-05-09
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
77 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-10-14
2023-01-20
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Study of Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR) Working Mechanism
NCT01209377
The Effect of Flash Technique Via Self-Therapy App on Depression, Anxiety, and Traumatic Symptoms
NCT06419387
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Therapy in Neuropathic Painful Spinal Cord Injury Patients
NCT05645003
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Therapy in Spinal Cord Injury Related Neuropathic Pain
NCT06726954
Pilot Study for the Effects of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on the Brain Using an Electronic Medical Device
NCT02932085
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
In this study, it will be investigated the efficacy of EMDR 2.0 Online Group Protocol on post-traumatic symptoms compared to control group. Therefore, the randomized control trial is based on EMDR 2.0 group as an intervention. Compared to previous EMDR 2.0 individual settings, this study is based on a group protocol made by our team. This group protocol has been tested in a pilot study on volunteer mental health professionals. The results of this pilot study showed that EMDR 2.0 group protocol was successful, and investigators decided to begin the randomized control trial research.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
EMDR 2.0
EMDR 2.0 Online Group protocol will be administered.
EMDR 2.0 group protocol
EMDR 2.0 group protocol
Control
Mental Health Gap Action Programme (mhGAP) will be administered.
Mhgap stress module
Mhgap stress module
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
EMDR 2.0 group protocol
EMDR 2.0 group protocol
Mhgap stress module
Mhgap stress module
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Having a traffic accident between 6 months and 10 years
* Having necessary knowledge on using relevant technological devices
Exclusion Criteria
* Having a lower score of 7 on Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs)
* Having pre-existing psychotic disorder
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Academy of Therapeutic Sciences, Turkey
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Academy of Therapeutic Sciences
Istanbul, , Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Baddeley A. Working memory: theories, models, and controversies. Annu Rev Psychol. 2012;63:1-29. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100422. Epub 2011 Sep 27.
de Jongh A, Ernst R, Marques L, Hornsveld H. The impact of eye movements and tones on disturbing memories involving PTSD and other mental disorders. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2013 Dec;44(4):477-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2013.07.002. Epub 2013 Jul 13.
Littel, M., Remijn, M., Tinga, A. M., Engelhard, I. M., & van den Hout, M. A. (2017). Stress Enhances the Memory-Degrading Effects of Eye Movements on Emotionally Neutral Memories. Clinical Psychological Science, 5(2), 316-324. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167702616687292
Littel M, van Schie K. No evidence for the inverted U-Curve: More demanding dual tasks cause stronger aversive memory degradation. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2019 Dec;65:101484. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2019.101484. Epub 2019 May 13.
Matthijssen SJMA, Verhoeven LCM, van den Hout MA, Heitland I. Auditory and Visual Memories in PTSD Patients Targeted with Eye Movements and Counting: The Effect of Modality-Specific Loading of Working Memory. Front Psychol. 2017 Nov 3;8:1937. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01937. eCollection 2017.
Matthijssen SJMA, van Beerschoten LM, de Jongh A, Klugkist IG, van den Hout MA. Effects of "Visual Schema Displacement Therapy" (VSDT), an abbreviated EMDR protocol and a control condition on emotionality and vividness of aversive memories: Two critical analogue studies. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2019 Jun;63:48-56. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2018.11.006. Epub 2018 Nov 27.
Matthijssen SJMA, van Schie K, van den Hout MA. The Effect of modality specific interference on working memory in recalling aversive auditory and visual memories. Cogn Emot. 2019 Sep;33(6):1169-1180. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2018.1547271. Epub 2018 Nov 22.
Matthijssen SJMA, Brouwers T, van Roozendaal C, Vuister T, de Jongh A. The effect of EMDR versus EMDR 2.0 on emotionality and vividness of aversive memories in a non-clinical sample. Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2021 Sep 22;12(1):1956793. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2021.1956793. eCollection 2021.
van den Hout MA, Eidhof MB, Verboom J, Littel M, Engelhard IM. Blurring of emotional and non-emotional memories by taxing working memory during recall. Cogn Emot. 2014;28(4):717-27. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2013.848785. Epub 2013 Nov 7.
van Veen SC, van Schie K, Wijngaards-de Meij LD, Littel M, Engelhard IM, van den Hout MA. Speed Matters: Relationship between Speed of Eye Movements and Modification of Aversive Autobiographical Memories. Front Psychiatry. 2015 Apr 7;6:45. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2015.00045. eCollection 2015.
Yasar AB, Gundogmus I, Kubilay D, Alban Tunca G, Uygun E, Zat Ciftci Z, Kavakci O. The effectiveness of online Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing 2.0 Group Protocol on post-traumatic stress disorders symptoms, depression, anxiety, and stress in individuals who have experienced a traffic accident: a randomized-controlled study. Front Psychiatry. 2025 May 9;16:1452206. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1452206. eCollection 2025.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan, and Informed Consent Form
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
TBA2021
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.