Accelerated Hypofractionated 1 Week Radiotherapy in Breast Cancer Patients
NCT ID: NCT05591456
Last Updated: 2022-10-25
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
100 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2018-01-01
2019-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The aim is to evaluate toxicity and disease control after implementation of accelerated hypofractionated 1 week chest wall irradiation in breast cancer patients.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
RCT Comparing 2 Radiotherapy HypoFractionation Schedules In Breast Cancer Patients
NCT04550910
Adjuvant Ultra-Hypofractionated vs Hypofractionated Radiotherapy for Early Breast Cancer
NCT07274800
Adjuvant Whole Breast Irradiation in Five Fractions Versus Fifteen Fractions in Early Breast Cancer
NCT05112341
Accelerated Hypofractionated Whole Breast Irradiation Plus Sequential Boost Versus Concomitant Boost Following BCS
NCT03710733
Hypofractionation And Ultra-Hypofractionation In Adjuvant Radiotherapy For Breast Cancer
NCT04434677
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Treatment schedule and delivery The patients who met the inclusion criteria were randomly divided into two groups, each group of 50 patients. The first group (arm A) will receive a dose of 27 Gy to the chest wall using 3D conformal radiotherapy (5.4 Gy per fraction) over one week, whilst, the second group (arm B) will receive a dose of 40 Gy to the chest wall (2.67 Gy per fraction) over three weeks.
Setup, simulation and target definition For setup, patients were positioned on a wingboard with both arms raised above the head and radiopaque markers along breast borders. Subsequently, the 5-mm slice-thick axial CT images were acquired from the lower mandible aspect to 5 cm below contralateral inframammary fold. The CT images will be automatically transferred to a planning workstation, where the CTV and relevant organs-at-risk (OARs) will be outlined. The planning of the tangential fields will be based on the target volume delineation for the dose-volume distribution analysis. The heart and ipsilateral lung were separately contoured as organs at risk, the heart was outlined to the pulmonary trunk superiorly, including pericardium and excluding major vessels. For setup verification purposes, weekly digitally reconstructed radiographs (DRRs) were performed.
Evaluation of Treatment Follow-up is done for assessment of toxicity and disease-free and overall survival.
During follow-up, patients are examined after completion of radiotherapy and at 3 and 6 months. Surveillance includes a full clinical examination, hematological and biochemical laboratory evaluation, tumor markers: CA15-3, plain chest X-ray, pelvi-abdominal ultrasound, ECHO for left cancer breast, bone scan if indicated.
Acute skin toxicity was assessed at the completion of radiotherapy and after 3 months (RTOG 2015), late skin toxicity was scored from 6 months after radiation and referred to the time of last examination (LENT/Soma Tables 1995). The maximal detected toxicity was scored according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 3.0, using the RTOG/EORTC toxicity scale associated with radiation as reference (NCI 2013) (Cox et al, 1995).
Admininistrative Design
Approvals for performing this study are obtained from:
A) The recruited cases; B) The Institutional Review Board (IRB) RESULTS Collected data will be presented in tables and suitable graphs and analyzed using SSPS package. Mean and standard deviations will be estimated for quantitative data and median for non-normally distributed data. Actuarial or life tables analysis will be used for estimating survival and long-rank test for comparison of curves. P value is significant at 0.05 level.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
group 1
The first group 50 patient (arm A) will receive a dose of 27 Gy to the chest wall using 3D conformal radiotherapy (5.4 Gy per fraction) over one week,
adjuvant radiotherapy
Treatment schedule and delivery The patients who met the inclusion criteria were randomly divided into two groups, each group of 50 patients. The first group (arm A) will receive a dose of 27 Gy to the chest wall using 3D conformal radiotherapy (5.4 Gy per fraction) over one week, whilst, the second group (arm B) will receive a dose of 40 Gy to the chest wall (2.67 Gy per fraction) over three weeks.
group 2
the second group 50 patient (arm B) will receive a dose of 40 Gy to the chest wall (2.67 Gy per fraction) over three weeks.
adjuvant radiotherapy
Treatment schedule and delivery The patients who met the inclusion criteria were randomly divided into two groups, each group of 50 patients. The first group (arm A) will receive a dose of 27 Gy to the chest wall using 3D conformal radiotherapy (5.4 Gy per fraction) over one week, whilst, the second group (arm B) will receive a dose of 40 Gy to the chest wall (2.67 Gy per fraction) over three weeks.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
adjuvant radiotherapy
Treatment schedule and delivery The patients who met the inclusion criteria were randomly divided into two groups, each group of 50 patients. The first group (arm A) will receive a dose of 27 Gy to the chest wall using 3D conformal radiotherapy (5.4 Gy per fraction) over one week, whilst, the second group (arm B) will receive a dose of 40 Gy to the chest wall (2.67 Gy per fraction) over three weeks.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* prior modified radical mastectomy
* negative resection margins (3 mm)
* pathological stage pT1-pT2, N0-2 (AJCC, 2017)
* no macroscopic evidence of distant metastases at diagnosis
* Age 18-80 years
* Normal hematological and biochemical laboratory tests
* Written informed consent was obtained from all patients
Exclusion Criteria
* positive surgical margins
* prior thoracic radiation
* synchronous second primary tumor
* distant metastases
* pregnancy
* presence of a concomitant psychiatric disorder precluding an aware informed consent.
* age \>80 years
18 Years
80 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Zagazig University
OTHER_GOV
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Rawda Ahmed Abdul Hakim Balata
Dr
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Rawda Balata, dr
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Zagazig University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Zagazig university hospitals
Zagazig, Sharqia Province, Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, Bray F. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209-249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
Ash DV, Benson EA, Sainsbury JR, Round C, Head C. Seven-year follow-up on 334 patients treated by breast conserving surgery and short course radical postoperative radiotherapy: a report of the Yorkshire Breast Cancer Group. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 1995;7(2):93-6. doi: 10.1016/s0936-6555(05)80808-8.
Ibrahim AS, Khaled HM, Mikhail NN, Baraka H, Kamel H. Cancer incidence in egypt: results of the national population-based cancer registry program. J Cancer Epidemiol. 2014;2014:437971. doi: 10.1155/2014/437971. Epub 2014 Sep 21.
Fajdic J, Djurovic D, Gotovac N, Hrgovic Z. Criteria and procedures for breast conserving surgery. Acta Inform Med. 2013 Mar;21(1):16-9. doi: 10.5455/AIM.2013.21.16-19.
Aleknavicius E, Atkocius V, Kuzmickiene I, Steponaviciene R. Postmastectomy internal mammary nodal irradiation: a long-term outcome. Medicina (Kaunas). 2014;50(4):230-6. doi: 10.1016/j.medici.2014.09.010. Epub 2014 Oct 7.
Mannino M, Yarnold JR. Shorter fractionation schedules in breast cancer radiotherapy: clinical and economic implications. Eur J Cancer. 2009 Mar;45(5):730-1. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2009.01.024. Epub 2009 Feb 23. No abstract available.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Radiotherapy in Breast Cancer
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.