A Clinical Trial Comparing FS With ZOE and Non-eugenol Based Materials in Primary Teeth Pulpotomies
NCT ID: NCT05557812
Last Updated: 2025-02-26
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
EARLY_PHASE1
19 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-02-02
2025-02-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Zincoxide-propolis vs Zincoxide-eugenol Pulpectomy
NCT05230797
Comparison of ZOE vs ZON in Primary Mandibular Molars Pulpectomy of 5-7-Year-Olds
NCT07090252
Pulpotomy Versus Pulpectomy in Vital Primary Incisors
NCT05589025
Lesion Sterilization And Tissue Repair Versus Zinc Oxide And Eugenol For Treatment of Necrotic Primary Molars
NCT05448937
Pulpotomy Materials in Primary Molars
NCT07120321
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Null hypothesis: In primary molar pulpotomy, non-eugenol based ZOE placed over ferric sulphate do not show higher success rate compared to eugenol based zinc oxide as a base material
Alternate hypothesis: In primary molar pulpotomy, non-eugenol based ZOE placed over ferric sulphate show a higher success rate compared to eugenol based zinc oxide as a base material
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
non-eugenol based ZOE and Ferric Sulfate
non-eugenol based ZOE and Ferric Sulfate in primary molar pulpotomy procedures.
non-eugenol based ZOE base material with Ferric Sulfate in primary molar pulpotomies
non-eugenol based ZOE base material placed over ferric sulphate, during vital pulp therapy (pulpotomy) in primary molars
eugenol based zinc oxide and Ferric Sulfate
eugenol based zinc oxide and Ferric Sulfate in primary molars pulpotomies procedures.
eugenol based zinc oxide and Ferric Sulfate
eugenol based zinc oxide base material placed over Ferric Sulfate medicament, during vital pulp therapy (pulpotomy) in primary molars
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
non-eugenol based ZOE base material with Ferric Sulfate in primary molar pulpotomies
non-eugenol based ZOE base material placed over ferric sulphate, during vital pulp therapy (pulpotomy) in primary molars
eugenol based zinc oxide and Ferric Sulfate
eugenol based zinc oxide base material placed over Ferric Sulfate medicament, during vital pulp therapy (pulpotomy) in primary molars
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Carious teeth with clinical and radiographic diagnosis of reversible pulpitis
* Only teeth having no more than one third of their roots undergoing physiologic resorption were included.
* Restorable with stainless steel crown
Exclusion Criteria
* excessive bleeding
* pathologic mobility
* swelling or fistula
* history of spontaneous and nocturnal pain
* tenderness to percussion or palpation
* external or internal root resorption : {The primary teeth undergo resorption due to developing permanent teeth which is considered normal. Presence of internal root resorption will be considered as a failure (pathological change). Alternatively external root resorption will not be considered as a failure (physiological change}
* inter radicular or periapical radiolucency.
3 Years
7 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Virginia Commonwealth University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jayakumar Jayaraman, BDS MDS PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Virginia Commonwealth University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Virginia Commonwealth University
Richmond, Virginia, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
HM20024506
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.