Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
537 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2022-09-30
2023-10-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Assessment of Physical Performance in Children
NCT07107984
Diet, Exercise and Body Fat in 3-5 Year Olds
NCT00615641
AFRI Childhood Obesity Prevention Challenge Area
NCT04469816
Effects of Complementary Feeding Counseling on Appropriate Complementary Feeding Practices and Child Undernutrition
NCT05871346
Change in Child-feeding Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices With Nutrition Education Mass Media in Ghana
NCT02800564
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) is an alternate nutritional measure that can be used as a possible predictor of weight-for -height irrespective of age. MUAC measurement is a simple, non-invasive, rapid and inexpensive tool for screening malnutrition. Therefore, World Health Organization (WHO) has suggested for evaluation of MUAC for screening at the community level.(Geneva et al; 2020)
Subjective Global Assessment (SGA), a method of nutritional assessment based on clinical judgment, has been widely used to assess the nutritional status for both clinical and research purposes.( Am J Clin Nutr et al; 2007) Because nutritional assessment is difficult, a new technique called Subjective Global Assessment (SGA) was developed. Its ratings have been found to be highly predictive of outcome.4 The procedure is easy to learn and simple to implement. SGA requires no additional laboratory testing or capital outlay. In addition, SGA has been found to correlate strongly with other subjective and objective measures of nutrition( Covinsky KE et al; 2004)
SGA classifies the patient as:
A. Well-nourished B. Mildly malnourished or suspected of malnutrition C. Severely malnourished Clinicians place the patient into one of these categories based upon their subjective rating of the patient in two broad areas: 1. Medical History, 2. Physical Examination.
In general, 60% of the clinician's rating of the patient is based on the results of the medical history, and 40% on the physical examination(see SGA evaluation form)( Covinsky KE et al; 2004)
Medical History Section
The first SGA component, the medical history, involves asking questions and evaluating the patient's answers about the following four parameters:
1. Weight change
2. Dietary intake
3. Gastrointestinal symptoms
4. Functional impairment The patient is rated as either nourished, mildly, moderately malnourished, or severely malnourished for each of the four parameters.
Physical Examination Section Physical evidence of malnutrition is rated differently. There are four categories to select from: normal nutrition, mild malnutrition, moderate malnutrition, or severe malnutrition.
Physical signs to examine include:
1. Loss of subcutaneous fat
2. Muscle wasting
3. Edema
4. Ascites (in hemodialysis patients only) There are several body locations to examine for each parameter(Covinsky KE et al; 2004)
Anthropometric measurments: Anthropometry is the most used tool for nutitional assessment, since it is non-invasive, cheap and it presents quite satisfactory results. In the anthropometric assessment of children's nutritional status, the variables weight, height (or lengh), sex, and age are comined to form anthropometric indices. These are currently expressed as persentiles or z-scores units. The values obtained in the assassed subjects are compared with those produced from a healthy population,which constitute the anthropometric standards (Da Silva et al; 2020)
Screening Tools For Assessment of Malnutrition in Pediatrics(STAMP) : STAMP is nutrition screening tool widely used in children. It considers the present state of medical condition, nutritional intake and history of weight changes. It was published in 2012 after the pilot study among hospitalized children in the UK. It has also been validated in developed and developing countries(Ong SH et al; 2019)
Screening Tool for Risk on Nutritinal Status and Growth (STRONG): STRONG kids developed for hospitalized children. This nutritional risk-screening questionnaire consists of four items: high-risk disease, subjective clinical assessment, nutritional intake and losses, and weight loss or poor weight gain, and each item is allocated a score of 1or 2 points with a maximum total score of 5 points Questions answered unclear were classified as no. A child with a STRONG kids risk score of 0,1-3, or 4-5 has, respectively, a lowm moderate, or high risk of developing malnutrition(Joosten K et al; 2016)
Paediatric Yorkhill Malnutrition Score (The PYMS): form is presented as a simple structured questionnaire, consisting of four questions (steps) which are strong predictors/symptoms of malnutrition. Each of these steps bears a score from 0 to 2 and an overall nutritional risk score (step 5) is calculated based on the sum of the results of steps 1 action plan follows outlined below:
Step 1: Body Mass Index (BMI) STEP 2: Recent Weight Loss STEP 3: Assess Recent Change in Diet/Nutritional Support (for at least the last week) STEP 4: Acute Admission/Condition Effect on Nutrition (at least the next week) STEP 5: Total Nutrition Risk Score and Action Plan( NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde et al; 2009)
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
OTHER
CROSS_SECTIONAL
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Both sexes are included
Exclusion Criteria
6 Months
5 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Aghapy Gamal Zahy Shafik
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Aghapy Gamal Zahy Shafik
Resident doctor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Osama Mahmoud Elasheer
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Professor of pediatrics
Amir Mohammed Abo-elgheet
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Assistant professor
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Elia M, Ljungqvist O and Dowsett J (2005) Principal of Clinical Nutrition:Contrasting the Practice of Nutrition in Health and Disease. Oxford, Blackwell Science Ltd
Guideline: Updates on the Management of Severe Acute Malnutrition in Infants and Children. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2013. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK190328/
Secker DJ, Jeejeebhoy KN. Subjective Global Nutritional Assessment for children. Am J Clin Nutr. 2007 Apr;85(4):1083-9. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/85.4.1083.
Covinsky KE, Martin GE, Beyth RJ, Justice AC, Sehgal AR, Landefeld CS. The relationship between clinical assessments of nutritional status and adverse outcomes in older hospitalized medical patients. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1999 May;47(5):532-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1999.tb02566.x.
Ferreira HDS. Anthropometric assessment of children's nutritional status: a new approach based on an adaptation of Waterlow's classification. BMC Pediatr. 2020 Feb 11;20(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s12887-020-1940-6.
Ong SH, Chee WSS, Lapchmanan LM, Ong SN, Lua ZC, Yeo JX. Validation of the Subjective Global Nutrition Assessment (SGNA) and Screening Tool for the Assessment of Malnutrition in Paediatrics (STAMP) to Identify Malnutrition in Hospitalized Malaysian Children. J Trop Pediatr. 2019 Feb 1;65(1):39-45. doi: 10.1093/tropej/fmy009.
Joosten K, van der Velde K, Joosten P, Rutten H, Hulst J, Dulfer K. Association between nutritional status and subjective health status in chronically ill children attending special schools. Qual Life Res. 2016 Apr;25(4):969-77. doi: 10.1007/s11136-015-1130-4. Epub 2015 Sep 11.
Nutrition Tool Steering Group, Women and children's Directorate, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, 2009.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Mid upper arm circumference
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.