Measuring the Weight Status, Primary Care Usage and Dietary Intake in the Pediatric Emergency Department
NCT ID: NCT02265185
Last Updated: 2015-11-20
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
484 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2014-10-31
2015-02-28
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
There has been very little work exploring the potential of alternative care settings, such as the pediatric Emergency Department (ED) in addressing childhood obesity. While provider time is also limited in the ED, there is often a considerable amount of downtime during emergency department visits that could be valuable time for patient and parent education. There may also be an opportunity to reach parents and children in the ED who do not regularly utilize primary care. In order to explore the possibility of pediatric obesity interventions in Children's Pediatric Emergency Department, we will need to measure the prevalence of obesity in the population that utilizes the Children's ED. The height of patients seen in the ED is not routinely measured, which makes calculating BMI to determine obesity impossible. This study, establishing the prevalence of obesity in Children's Emergency Department will lay the groundwork for future work addressing obesity in the ED.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
There is little research on what role alternative healthcare setting could play in addressing childhood obesity. The pediatric ED is currently untapped as a setting for obesity screening, treatment and prevention (12). Yet, childhood obesity has important implications for emergency medicine and trauma care, and the pediatric ED may be shouldering a disproportionate burden of this disease compared to other healthcare settings (13, 14). Not addressing a patient's obesity in the ED setting is a missed opportunity, especially when many visits are obesity- related (e.g., asthma, type 2 diabetes, fractures), and weight reduction in specific subgroups could lead to a decrease in future ED utilization. The pediatric ED may not seem like an ideal location for addressing childhood obesity but many visits are for non-emergent/urgent conditions and these types of visits provide a window for screening and intervention (12,15). Families spend a substantial amount of time in the ED waiting for laboratory/radiology results and disposition. In 2013, the average length of stay in the Children's EDs was 155 minutes in Minneapolis and 143 minutes in St. Paul, valuable time that could be used for obesity screening, education, and connection to external resources. The pediatric ED has the potential to be an important additional healthcare setting for obesity screening, education, and linkage to external resources, but much more research is needed (12,13,16).
Three previous studies have examined obesity rates in the pediatric ED, each finding a higher prevalence of obesity compared to the general population (12,13,16). Prendergast et al. conducted a retrospective chart review and found a prevalence of obesity of 29% in a Chicago pediatric ED, nearly double the national average of 17% (12). The other two studies collected cross-sectional data from small samples in urban pediatric EDs and found a prevalence of obesity of 24% (13) and 21.6% (16). Only one study has tested obesity screening in the pediatric ED (16). Vaughn et al. found that all parents were receptive to obesity screening and prevention in the ED, regardless of race (16). They also found that only 7.6% of parents reported that their child's regular physician had counseled them regarding their child's weight, highlighting the need for obesity screening in additional healthcare settings (16). These studies indicate that pediatric EDs are seeing a population of patients at high risk for obesity, many of whom may not be receiving screening or counseling from their regular physician. Other topics in emergency medicine have received far greater coverage in the literature, including smoking cessation, injury prevention and substance abuse (13). With the dramatic increase in pediatric obesity, research on obesity in the pediatric ED is especially warranted as innovative strategies and collaboration across healthcare settings will be needed to successfully address this epidemic.
Currently, the prevalence of obesity in patients who utilize the pediatric ED at Children's Hospitals and Clinics of Minnesota is unknown. Because of time constraints, the height of patients seen in the pediatric ED are not routinely measured or recorded in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR). Establishing prevalence of obesity in this population is not possible without measuring the height of PED patients to determine BMI. Establishing the prevalence in the population of patients who utilize the pediatric ED will lay the groundwork for future grant proposals and research in this area.
Research Questions:
1. What is the prevalence of obesity in the Children's ED patient population?
2. What is the association between weight status and ED utilization for injury, asthma and mental health?
Study Design We will conduct a cross-sectional cohort study of patients aged 2-10 in Children's ED.
Methods ED research assistants will screen the ED log for patients in the 2-10 age range triaged level 3-5. Research assistants will randomly determine 1 out of 5 patients to approach for study enrollment. After the consent process is completed, the research assistant will measure and record the child's height, and ask the parent to complete a short questionnaire.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
CROSS_SECTIONAL
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
ED Patients
Children aged 2-10 visiting the Emergency Department.
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Patient between 2 and 10 years of age (inclusive)
3. Parent able to consent
Exclusion Criteria
2 Years
10 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Children's Hospitals and Clinics of Minnesota
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Gretchen Cutler, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Children's Hospitals and Clinics of Minnesota
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Children's Hospitals and Clinics of Minnesota
Minneapolis and Saint Paul, Minnesota, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
1409-091
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id