Efficacy and Safety of Emodepside in Adolescents and Adults Infected With Hookworm

NCT ID: NCT05538767

Last Updated: 2023-06-15

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

320 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-09-16

Study Completion Date

2023-04-11

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

To compare the efficacy and safety of emodepside to that of albendazole (Zentel®) in participants aged 12-60, inclusive, infected with hookworm.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hookworm Infections

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Emodepside 30 mg

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Emodepside

Intervention Type DRUG

Treatment with Emodepside 30 mg

Albendazole 400 mg

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Albendazole 400mg

Intervention Type DRUG

Treatment with Albendazole 400 mg

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Emodepside

Treatment with Emodepside 30 mg

Intervention Type DRUG

Albendazole 400mg

Treatment with Albendazole 400 mg

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Male or female adults aged between 12 and 60 years;
* Written and signed informed consent;
* Was examined by a study physician before treatment;
* Provided two stool samples at baseline;
* Hookworm EPG \> 48 and at least two Kato-Katz thick smears slides with more than one hookworm eggs.

Exclusion Criteria

* Pregnant or lactating and/or planning to become pregnant within three months after drug treatment;
* Type 1 and/or 2 diabetes;
* Psychiatric disorders;
* History of ophthalmological conditions;
* Presence or history of major systemic or chronic illnesses, as assessed by a medical doctor, during initial clinical assessment;
* Suffers from severe anaemia (Hb \< 80 g/l);
* Received anthelminthic treatment within past four weeks;
* Attending other clinical trials during the study;
* Received strong CYP3A4 inducers or inhibitors as well as concomitant treatments that are relevant substrate for CYP3A4 such as clarithromycin, erythromycin and rifampicin;
* Received strong P-gp inhibitors as well as concomitant treatments that are relevant substrates for P-gp such as clotrimazole and ritonavir.
* Participated in stage I trials of this protocol
Minimum Eligible Age

12 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Public Health Laboratory Ivo de Carneri

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Jennifer Keiser

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Jennifer Keiser

Prof. Dr.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Public Health Laboratory Ivo de Carneri

Chake Chake, Pemba, Tanzania

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Tanzania

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Taylor L, Ahmada AA, Ali MS, Ali SM, Hattendorf J, Mohammed IS, Keiser J. Efficacy and safety of emodepside compared with albendazole in adolescents and adults with hookworm infection in Pemba Island, Tanzania: a double-blind, superiority, phase 2b, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2024 Aug 17;404(10453):683-691. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)01403-X.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 39153818 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

EMODEPSIDE_PEMBA

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Efficacy and Safety of IVM/ALB Co-administration
NCT03527732 COMPLETED PHASE2/PHASE3
Better Options for Lymphatic Filariasis Treatment
NCT07159373 NOT_YET_RECRUITING PHASE3