Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Musculoskeletal Pain in Patients With Parkinson's Disease
NCT ID: NCT05537597
Last Updated: 2022-12-08
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
40 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-01-01
2025-05-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of the primary motor cortex(M1)has been proposed to provide definite analgesic effect for pain syndromes. However, very few placebo-controlled studies have been performed specifically to relieve pain in PD. What's more, based on behavioral measures alone, it is impossible to reveal the full network dynamics reflecting the impact of TMS.
Electroencephalography (EEG), with high temporal resolution, records signal that its origin in electrical neural activity, which makes it suitable for measuring TMS-evoked activation. By recording the TMS induced neuronal activation directly from the cortex, TMS-EEG provides information on the excitability, effective connectivity of cortical area, thus exploring cortical network properties in different functional brain states. In addition, the use of EEG offers great prospects as a tool to select the right patients in order to achieve adequate, long-term pain relief.
Besides assessing the efficacy and safety of high-frequency neuronavigated M1-rTMS in PD patients with musculoskeletal pain, the objective of this study additionally aimed to characterize cortical activation behind pain relief. Influence on motor and other non-motor symptoms after rTMS were also investigated.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Efficacy of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Parkinson's Disease:A Randomized, Double-blind, Multicenter, Placebo-controlled Trial
NCT06583278
A Multicenter Clinical Study of rTMS for Parkinson's Disease
NCT06009471
Deep rTMS in Parkinson Disease Pain Syndromes
NCT03504748
Evaluation of the Effect of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Pain Perception in Parkinson's Disease
NCT01275573
Clinical Efficacy of Intermittent Theta Burst Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation With Different Modes on Parkinson's Disease
NCT07176091
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
It estimated the prevalence of painful phenomena in PD to be 30 to 85% (mean 66%), which is significantly greater than the age-matched general population. Painful experiences in PD are highly heterogeneous and complex, which is difficult to describe for patients but also diagnose for neurologists. In addition, this common and disabling symptom receives inadequate analgesic treatment.
The distinction between these pain subtypes is required so that different therapeutic strategies can be established for each type of pain. The King's Parkinson's Pain scale (KPPS) was validated to identify and rate the various types of pain in PD. Fourteen items cover seven main domains, including musculoskeletal pain, chronic body pain (central or visceral), fluctuation-related pain, dyskinetic-dystonic pain, nocturnal pain, oro-facial pain, discolouration/oedema/swelling, and radicular pain. Of these subtypes, musculoskeletal pain is common.
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a non-invasive brain stimulation technique that may be useful for the treatment of various psychiatric and neurological disorders. The mechanisms underlying rTMS effects remain to be elucidated.
rTMS is postulated to induce neuronal excitability changes in a set of cortical and subcortical areas involved in pain processing and modulation. Interestingly, M1 stimulation had a positive effect on brain structures that are related to the affective-emotional components of pain, such as the insular cortex and cingulate cortex.
The best efficacy for chronic pain has been achieved when primary motor cortex (M1) is stimulated at high frequency (5 to 20 Hz, 80% of the resting motor threshold (RMT)), as in previous rTMS studies in analgesia.
In TMS, time-varying magnetic fields generates electrical currents in the cortex. TMS pulses can either directly or trans-synaptically depolarize neurons, and these neural activities can be recorded through the skull by EEG electrodes placed on the scalp. The combination of TMS with simultaneous EEG can be used to assess excitability, inhibition, plasticity and connectivity across almost all areas of the cortical mantle.
The characterization of potential TMS-EEG predictors and markers could be the theoretical basis for verifying the response to neuromodulation protocols.
In this randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, the efficacy and safety of 7 sessions of 20 Hz-rTMS delivered to M1 will be assessed in PD patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain.
A single-pulse TMS-EEG and resting-state EEG directly provide information on the cortical mechanisms before and after rTMS of M1.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
M1-rTMS group
active M1-rTMS
Magnetic stimulation will be carried out using a MagPro X100 machine with a MCF-B70 figure-of-eight coil (Magventure, Farum). All rTMS sessions will be assisted by a neuronavigation system (TMS Navigator,Localite GmbH), maintaining the M1 target and the orientation of coil stable during stimulation sessions. The M1 target was defined as the "hand knob" region, which corresponds to the motor cortical representation of the hand, regardless of the location of pain.
Stimulation paradigm consists of 20 trains of pulses with an intra-train frequency of 20 Hz, resulting in 2000 pulses for a total duration of 20 minutes.
The stimulation intensity will be 80% of RMT, defined as the lowest stimulation intensity necessary to induce a visible muscle twitch of the hand contralateral to the stimulated hemisphere.
Participants will receive 7 sessions of treatment once a day in the same time continuously for 7 days, and keep antiparkinsonism drugs unchanged throughout the whole study.
sham-rTMS group
sham rTMS
The sham protocol was similar to the rTMS protocol. Sham stimulations will be performed with a MCF-P-B65 figure-of-eight coil (Magventure) to M1, assisted by a neuronavigation system.
The following stimulation parameters will be used: stimulus frequency 20 Hz; stimulus intensity 80 % of RMT; total stimulation pulses 2,000; total stimulation time 20 min.
Participants will receive 7 sessions of treatment once a day in the same time continuously for 7 days, and keep antiparkinsonism drugs unchanged throughout the whole study.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
active M1-rTMS
Magnetic stimulation will be carried out using a MagPro X100 machine with a MCF-B70 figure-of-eight coil (Magventure, Farum). All rTMS sessions will be assisted by a neuronavigation system (TMS Navigator,Localite GmbH), maintaining the M1 target and the orientation of coil stable during stimulation sessions. The M1 target was defined as the "hand knob" region, which corresponds to the motor cortical representation of the hand, regardless of the location of pain.
Stimulation paradigm consists of 20 trains of pulses with an intra-train frequency of 20 Hz, resulting in 2000 pulses for a total duration of 20 minutes.
The stimulation intensity will be 80% of RMT, defined as the lowest stimulation intensity necessary to induce a visible muscle twitch of the hand contralateral to the stimulated hemisphere.
Participants will receive 7 sessions of treatment once a day in the same time continuously for 7 days, and keep antiparkinsonism drugs unchanged throughout the whole study.
sham rTMS
The sham protocol was similar to the rTMS protocol. Sham stimulations will be performed with a MCF-P-B65 figure-of-eight coil (Magventure) to M1, assisted by a neuronavigation system.
The following stimulation parameters will be used: stimulus frequency 20 Hz; stimulus intensity 80 % of RMT; total stimulation pulses 2,000; total stimulation time 20 min.
Participants will receive 7 sessions of treatment once a day in the same time continuously for 7 days, and keep antiparkinsonism drugs unchanged throughout the whole study.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Hoehn and Yahr stages of I to III
3. musculoskeletal pain was detected based on the Ford classification system for pain in PD,chronic pain for ≥3 months
4. stable antiparkinsonian therapy for ≥4 weeks
Exclusion Criteria
2. unstable ongoing psychiatric disorder, history of substance abuse (alcohol, drugs)
3. histories of deep brain stimulation surgery
4. Mini-mental State Examination scores ≤24
5. Other pain conditions, such as apparent osteoarthritis, or rheumatoid arthritis depended on laboratory or imaging findings
40 Years
75 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Cheng-Jie Mao
Associate Professor
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Department of Neurology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University
Suzhou, Jiangsu, China
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Valkovic P, Minar M, Singliarova H, Harsany J, Hanakova M, Martinkova J, Benetin J. Pain in Parkinson's Disease: A Cross-Sectional Study of Its Prevalence, Types, and Relationship to Depression and Quality of Life. PLoS One. 2015 Aug 26;10(8):e0136541. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0136541. eCollection 2015.
Silverdale MA, Kobylecki C, Kass-Iliyya L, Martinez-Martin P, Lawton M, Cotterill S, Chaudhuri KR, Morris H, Baig F, Williams N, Hubbard L, Hu MT, Grosset DG; UK Parkinson's Pain Study Collaboration. A detailed clinical study of pain in 1957 participants with early/moderate Parkinson's disease. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2018 Nov;56:27-32. doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2018.06.001. Epub 2018 Jun 6.
Chaudhuri KR, Rizos A, Trenkwalder C, Rascol O, Pal S, Martino D, Carroll C, Paviour D, Falup-Pecurariu C, Kessel B, Silverdale M, Todorova A, Sauerbier A, Odin P, Antonini A, Martinez-Martin P; EUROPAR and the IPMDS Non Motor PD Study Group. King's Parkinson's disease pain scale, the first scale for pain in PD: An international validation. Mov Disord. 2015 Oct;30(12):1623-31. doi: 10.1002/mds.26270. Epub 2015 Jun 11.
Picarelli H, Teixeira MJ, de Andrade DC, Myczkowski ML, Luvisotto TB, Yeng LT, Fonoff ET, Pridmore S, Marcolin MA. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation is efficacious as an add-on to pharmacological therapy in complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) type I. J Pain. 2010 Nov;11(11):1203-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2010.02.006. Epub 2010 Apr 28.
O'Connell NE, Marston L, Spencer S, DeSouza LH, Wand BM. Non-invasive brain stimulation techniques for chronic pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Apr 13;4(4):CD008208. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008208.pub5.
Lefaucheur JP, Aleman A, Baeken C, Benninger DH, Brunelin J, Di Lazzaro V, Filipovic SR, Grefkes C, Hasan A, Hummel FC, Jaaskelainen SK, Langguth B, Leocani L, Londero A, Nardone R, Nguyen JP, Nyffeler T, Oliveira-Maia AJ, Oliviero A, Padberg F, Palm U, Paulus W, Poulet E, Quartarone A, Rachid F, Rektorova I, Rossi S, Sahlsten H, Schecklmann M, Szekely D, Ziemann U. Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS): An update (2014-2018). Clin Neurophysiol. 2020 Feb;131(2):474-528. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2019.11.002. Epub 2020 Jan 1.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
JD-LK-2021-132-01
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.