Intravenous Dexamethasone Effectiveness in Post Caesarean Section Analgesia
NCT ID: NCT05535036
Last Updated: 2022-09-10
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
84 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2020-02-10
2021-01-04
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Methods: We conducted a prospective, randomized, double-blinded study including 84 ASA II-III parturient at term who were proposed for caesarean section under SA. Parturient were randomized into two groups: Dexamethasone group (DG) who received 8mg of intravenous dexamethasone (2ml) immediately after SA and placebo group (PG) who received 2ml of isotonic saline. The analgesic protocol was standardized and we opted for Tramadol as rescue analgesic. The main outcome is the use of Tramadol in the first 24 hours postpartum..
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effect of Intravenous Dexamethasone Before Spinal Anesthesia on Post-cesarean Section Pain
NCT03122756
Dexamethasone Intravenous Versus Intrathecal in Spinal Anesthesia
NCT05470530
Dexamethasone for Post-operative Pain After Cesarean Delivery Under Neuraxial Anesthesia.
NCT07257406
Dexamethasone for Post Cesarean Delivery Analgesia
NCT01868633
Dexamethasone and Dexmedetomidine as an Adjuvant to Spinal Anesthesia for Elective Caesarean Sections
NCT04697745
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Patients:
Inclusion criteria were Age \>= 18 years, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) statue II-III, a pregnancy term \>= 37 weeks, elective cesarean section and Pfannenstiel incision.
Exclusion criteria were severe hypertension / preeclampsia, poorly balanced diabetes mellitus, allergy to one of the study drugs, patients with chronic pain or long-term use of opioids, and patients on long-term corticosteroid therapy.
Study protocol During the preoperative visit, all patients have had a full clinical examination and further examinations have been requested in accordance with the most recent guidelines. The informed written consent was obtained at this moment. Postoperative pain predisposition (the prediction of pain and the anxiety level) was assessed using a questionnaire.
Randomization and allocation were performed using a computer-generated sequence of randomization numbers and the envelope technique; patients were randomized into two groups:
* Dexamethasone Group (DG): receiving 8mg (2ml) of intravenous (IV) Dexamethasone after spinal anesthesia
* Placebo Group (PG): receiving 2 ml of IV Saline solution after spinal anesthesia.
Patients enrolled and the anesthesiologists in charge were both blinded to the study group. In the operating room, all patients had standard non-invasive monitoring including an electrocardiogram, non invasive blood pressure and pulse oxymetry. An 18-gauge intravenous cannula was inserted into the nondominant arm or hand and 500 ml of a saline solution (0.9 %) was infused. The prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) was assured to all patients by administering 4 mg of IV Ondansetron. Spinal anesthesia was performed according to our department protocol: L4-L5 or L3-L4 intervertebral space puncture using a 25 gauges needle, with injection of 0.5% hyperbaric Bupivacaine mixture (dose depending on patient height) associated with 2.5 ug Sufentanil and 100 ug Morphine. Before surgical incision, patients received either an intravenous injection of 8 mg (2 ml) Dexamethasone (DG) or 2 ml of a Saline solution (PG). During the procedure, we noted hemodynamic constants, surgical related data and APGAR score for the newborns. At the end, patients were transferred initially to the post-operative monitoring room, and then to the Gynecology Obstetric department after assessing the hemodynamic constants, the absence of bleeding, the good tone of the uterine globe and the disappearance of the motor block.
The analgesic protocol was standardized: systemic analgesia during the first 24 hours was assured by a postoperative regimen combining intravenous Paracetamol 1g\*4/day and Nefopam 20 mg\*3/day . The rescue analgesic is IV Tramadol 100 mg administered at the request of the patient and if the analog visual scale (AVS) was greater than 3/10, with a maximum dose of 100 mg \* 3/day. Static and dynamic pain was assessed at 2 hours, 6 hours, 12 hours and 24 hours postoperatively using the analog visual scale ( values raging from 0 for no pain to 10 for a maximum pain). Time to first request and cumulative dose of Tramadol were recorded. We also noted the length of the sensory and the motor blocks, postoperative nausea and vomiting and patient satisfaction. Hospital discharge was allowed after 24 hours if there were no complications.
Follow-up at 3 months:
Patients were contacted after 3 months to complete a telephonic survey about chronic pain and postpartum depression . We excluded patients who had other surgery within 3 months of the cesarean section or any other cause of chronic pain.
Outcomes:
Our main outcome was the use of Tramadol within the first 24 hours. Secondary endpoints were static and dynamic analog visual scale at 2 hours, 6 hours,12 hours, and 24 hours, time to first request of Tramadol, cumulative Tramadol dose within the first 24 hours, length of sensory and motor block, incidence of post-operative nausea and vomiting (PONV), chronic pain at 3 months, incidence of postpartum depression, and patient satisfaction.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
dexamethasone group
patients received 8mg(2ml) of intravenous dexamethasone after spinal anesthesia
Dexamethasone 4mg
all patients had standard non-invasive monitoring including an electrocardiogram, non invasive blood pressure and pulse oxymetry. An 18-gauge intravenous cannula was inserted into the nondominant arm or hand and 500 ml of a saline solution (0.9 %) was infused. The prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) was assured to all patients by administering 4 mg of IV Ondansetron. Spinal anesthesia was performed according to our department protocol: L4-L5 or L3-L4 intervertebral space puncture using a 25 gauges needle, with injection of 0.5% hyperbaric Bupivacaine mixture (dose depending on patient height) associated with 2.5 ug Sufentanil and 100 ug Morphine. Before surgical incision, patients received either an intravenous injection of 8 mg (2 ml) Dexamethasone (DG) or 2 ml of a Saline solution (PG).
placebo group
patients received 2ml of a saline solution after spinal anesthesia
Placebo
patients received 2ml of intravenous saline solution
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Dexamethasone 4mg
all patients had standard non-invasive monitoring including an electrocardiogram, non invasive blood pressure and pulse oxymetry. An 18-gauge intravenous cannula was inserted into the nondominant arm or hand and 500 ml of a saline solution (0.9 %) was infused. The prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) was assured to all patients by administering 4 mg of IV Ondansetron. Spinal anesthesia was performed according to our department protocol: L4-L5 or L3-L4 intervertebral space puncture using a 25 gauges needle, with injection of 0.5% hyperbaric Bupivacaine mixture (dose depending on patient height) associated with 2.5 ug Sufentanil and 100 ug Morphine. Before surgical incision, patients received either an intravenous injection of 8 mg (2 ml) Dexamethasone (DG) or 2 ml of a Saline solution (PG).
Placebo
patients received 2ml of intravenous saline solution
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* a pregnancy term \>= 37 weeks
* elective cesarean section
* Pfannenstiel incision
Exclusion Criteria
* poorly balanced diabetes mellitus
* allergy to one of the study drugs
* patients with chronic pain or long-term use of opioids
* patients on long-term corticosteroid therapy.
18 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Mongi Slim Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Mhamed Sami Mebazaa
clinical Professor
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Mongi Slim University Hospital
La Marsa, Tunis Governorate, Tunisia
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
dexa C section
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.