Intravenous Dexamethasone Effectiveness in Post Caesarean Section Analgesia

NCT ID: NCT05535036

Last Updated: 2022-09-10

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

84 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-02-10

Study Completion Date

2021-01-04

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The management of postpartum pain is essential to ensure early rehabilitation for parturients. Intravenous dexamethasone has a potent analgesic action when used in the context of general anesthesia. Nevertheless, it remains poorly studied in combination with spinal anesthesia (SA). The aim of this study was to assess the analgesic effect of intravenous dexamethasone after caesarean section under SA.

Methods: We conducted a prospective, randomized, double-blinded study including 84 ASA II-III parturient at term who were proposed for caesarean section under SA. Parturient were randomized into two groups: Dexamethasone group (DG) who received 8mg of intravenous dexamethasone (2ml) immediately after SA and placebo group (PG) who received 2ml of isotonic saline. The analgesic protocol was standardized and we opted for Tramadol as rescue analgesic. The main outcome is the use of Tramadol in the first 24 hours postpartum..

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

A a prospective randomized double-blinded controlled study including 84 parturient women, conducted at the Anesthesia and Surgical Intensive Care Department of Mongi Slim University Hospital, La Marsa Tunisia. It was performed after obtaining the approval of the Research Ethical Committee of our hospital (Ethical Committee No. 02/2020). Eligible patients were informed of the study design and their written consent was obtained.

Patients:

Inclusion criteria were Age \>= 18 years, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) statue II-III, a pregnancy term \>= 37 weeks, elective cesarean section and Pfannenstiel incision.

Exclusion criteria were severe hypertension / preeclampsia, poorly balanced diabetes mellitus, allergy to one of the study drugs, patients with chronic pain or long-term use of opioids, and patients on long-term corticosteroid therapy.

Study protocol During the preoperative visit, all patients have had a full clinical examination and further examinations have been requested in accordance with the most recent guidelines. The informed written consent was obtained at this moment. Postoperative pain predisposition (the prediction of pain and the anxiety level) was assessed using a questionnaire.

Randomization and allocation were performed using a computer-generated sequence of randomization numbers and the envelope technique; patients were randomized into two groups:

* Dexamethasone Group (DG): receiving 8mg (2ml) of intravenous (IV) Dexamethasone after spinal anesthesia
* Placebo Group (PG): receiving 2 ml of IV Saline solution after spinal anesthesia.

Patients enrolled and the anesthesiologists in charge were both blinded to the study group. In the operating room, all patients had standard non-invasive monitoring including an electrocardiogram, non invasive blood pressure and pulse oxymetry. An 18-gauge intravenous cannula was inserted into the nondominant arm or hand and 500 ml of a saline solution (0.9 %) was infused. The prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) was assured to all patients by administering 4 mg of IV Ondansetron. Spinal anesthesia was performed according to our department protocol: L4-L5 or L3-L4 intervertebral space puncture using a 25 gauges needle, with injection of 0.5% hyperbaric Bupivacaine mixture (dose depending on patient height) associated with 2.5 ug Sufentanil and 100 ug Morphine. Before surgical incision, patients received either an intravenous injection of 8 mg (2 ml) Dexamethasone (DG) or 2 ml of a Saline solution (PG). During the procedure, we noted hemodynamic constants, surgical related data and APGAR score for the newborns. At the end, patients were transferred initially to the post-operative monitoring room, and then to the Gynecology Obstetric department after assessing the hemodynamic constants, the absence of bleeding, the good tone of the uterine globe and the disappearance of the motor block.

The analgesic protocol was standardized: systemic analgesia during the first 24 hours was assured by a postoperative regimen combining intravenous Paracetamol 1g\*4/day and Nefopam 20 mg\*3/day . The rescue analgesic is IV Tramadol 100 mg administered at the request of the patient and if the analog visual scale (AVS) was greater than 3/10, with a maximum dose of 100 mg \* 3/day. Static and dynamic pain was assessed at 2 hours, 6 hours, 12 hours and 24 hours postoperatively using the analog visual scale ( values raging from 0 for no pain to 10 for a maximum pain). Time to first request and cumulative dose of Tramadol were recorded. We also noted the length of the sensory and the motor blocks, postoperative nausea and vomiting and patient satisfaction. Hospital discharge was allowed after 24 hours if there were no complications.

Follow-up at 3 months:

Patients were contacted after 3 months to complete a telephonic survey about chronic pain and postpartum depression . We excluded patients who had other surgery within 3 months of the cesarean section or any other cause of chronic pain.

Outcomes:

Our main outcome was the use of Tramadol within the first 24 hours. Secondary endpoints were static and dynamic analog visual scale at 2 hours, 6 hours,12 hours, and 24 hours, time to first request of Tramadol, cumulative Tramadol dose within the first 24 hours, length of sensory and motor block, incidence of post-operative nausea and vomiting (PONV), chronic pain at 3 months, incidence of postpartum depression, and patient satisfaction.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cesarean Section Dexamethasone Postoperative Pain Spinal Anesthesia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Caregivers Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

dexamethasone group

patients received 8mg(2ml) of intravenous dexamethasone after spinal anesthesia

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Dexamethasone 4mg

Intervention Type DRUG

all patients had standard non-invasive monitoring including an electrocardiogram, non invasive blood pressure and pulse oxymetry. An 18-gauge intravenous cannula was inserted into the nondominant arm or hand and 500 ml of a saline solution (0.9 %) was infused. The prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) was assured to all patients by administering 4 mg of IV Ondansetron. Spinal anesthesia was performed according to our department protocol: L4-L5 or L3-L4 intervertebral space puncture using a 25 gauges needle, with injection of 0.5% hyperbaric Bupivacaine mixture (dose depending on patient height) associated with 2.5 ug Sufentanil and 100 ug Morphine. Before surgical incision, patients received either an intravenous injection of 8 mg (2 ml) Dexamethasone (DG) or 2 ml of a Saline solution (PG).

placebo group

patients received 2ml of a saline solution after spinal anesthesia

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

patients received 2ml of intravenous saline solution

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Dexamethasone 4mg

all patients had standard non-invasive monitoring including an electrocardiogram, non invasive blood pressure and pulse oxymetry. An 18-gauge intravenous cannula was inserted into the nondominant arm or hand and 500 ml of a saline solution (0.9 %) was infused. The prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) was assured to all patients by administering 4 mg of IV Ondansetron. Spinal anesthesia was performed according to our department protocol: L4-L5 or L3-L4 intervertebral space puncture using a 25 gauges needle, with injection of 0.5% hyperbaric Bupivacaine mixture (dose depending on patient height) associated with 2.5 ug Sufentanil and 100 ug Morphine. Before surgical incision, patients received either an intravenous injection of 8 mg (2 ml) Dexamethasone (DG) or 2 ml of a Saline solution (PG).

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo

patients received 2ml of intravenous saline solution

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) statue II-III,
* a pregnancy term \>= 37 weeks
* elective cesarean section
* Pfannenstiel incision

Exclusion Criteria

* severe hypertension / preeclampsia
* poorly balanced diabetes mellitus
* allergy to one of the study drugs
* patients with chronic pain or long-term use of opioids
* patients on long-term corticosteroid therapy.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Mongi Slim Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Mhamed Sami Mebazaa

clinical Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Mongi Slim University Hospital

La Marsa, Tunis Governorate, Tunisia

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Tunisia

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

dexa C section

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Dexmedetomidine for Cesarean Delivery
NCT01005433 COMPLETED PHASE1