PREOPANC-4 Implementation Program for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer

NCT ID: NCT05524090

Last Updated: 2022-09-01

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Total Enrollment

223 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-07-01

Study Completion Date

2030-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

A prospective, nationwide, implementation program of the international standard of excellence for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) care in the Netherlands (2021\[7\]-2030\[6\]), including a multidisciplinary training program by the four leading international expert centers.

The PREOPANC-4 project aims a safe and patient-centered implementation of the international standards of excellence for LAPC (surgery) in the Netherlands.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Rationale:

Non-metastasized locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) is diagnosed in 35% of all pancreatic cancer patients and is traditionally treated with palliative care. Recently, the multidisciplinary management of LAPC has evolved by the introduction of modern multi-agent induction chemotherapies, leading to an increased resection rate and improved outlook for five-year survival. In contrast, five-year survival after chemotherapy without surgery is virtually non-existent. In the Netherlands, the LAPC resection rate after induction chemotherapy remains low with 8% versus 25% in international centers of excellence, leading to missed opportunities for five-year survival in a selected subgroup of LAPC patients. Explanations for this large difference include the spectrum of chemotherapy use, interpretation of diagnostics, patient selection, and surgical techniques.

Objective:

A safe and patient-centered implementation of the international standards of excellence for LAPC (surgery) in the Netherlands.

Study design:

A prospective, nationwide, implementation program of the international standard of excellence for LAPC care in the Netherlands (2021\[7\]-2030\[6\]), including a multidisciplinary training program by the four leading international expert centers (i.e. University of Heidelberg, University of Colorado, NYU Langone, and MD Anderson Cancer Center). Subsequently, the three Dutch centers with the highest surgical volume and documented experience in LAPC surgery will implement this highly complex LAPC surgery in close collaboration with the other Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Group (DPCG) centers. Patients who meet the inclusion criteria will be discussed within an online (inter)national expert panel to properly select patient for surgery. In addition, the other DPCG centers can present their LAPC patients to this panel for advice about (surgical) treatment options and if these patients should be referred to the three high-volume DPCG centers for surgery. Outcomes will be compared with a historical Dutch LAPC cohort, using propensity score matching.

Study population:

Adult patients with pathology confirmed non-metastasized LAPC and non-progressive disease after at least four months of (modified) FOLFIRINOX or gemcitabine-nab-paclitaxel induction chemotherapy and fit for major surgery.

Study aim:

The primary study aim is to double the LAPC resection rate in the Netherlands from 8% to 16% with adequate survival and morbidity targets.

Primary targets:

1. Survival: After resection, mOS of 25 months, 1-year survival \>90%, and 5-year survival \>20%. These outcomes will be compared to the Dutch cohort of patients (2015-2020) with RECIST non-progressive LAPC after induction chemotherapy who did not undergo surgical exploration;
2. In-hospital morbidity and mortality: in-hospital/30-day mortality ≤5% and in-hospital major morbidity of \<50% after resection, which will be compared with a recent Dutch cohort (2015-2020) of resected patients with borderline resectable and locally advanced pancreatic cancer after induction/neoadjuvant therapy.

Secondary targets:

1. Non-inferior radical resection (R0) rate as compared to a recent Dutch cohort (2015-2020) of resected patients with borderline resectable and locally advanced pancreatic cancer after induction/neoadjuvant therapy;
2. Non-inferior quality of life, mental and physical health status, and potential side effects on the long-term follow-up, compared to a control cohort of Dutch LAPC patients;
3. Non-inferior patients' healthcare satisfaction, compared to the Dutch historical cohort of pancreatic cancer patients.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pancreatic Cancer Locally Advanced Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Non-resectable Chemotherapy Effect

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Implementation cohort

Inclusion criteria:

1. Age ≥18 years;
2. Pathology confirmed LAPC\*;
3. CT-based non-progressive disease in accordance with the RECIST criteria after at least 4 months of systemic chemotherapy (\[m\]FOLFIRINOX or gemcitabine-nab-paclitaxel).

Exclusion criteria:

(1) Metastatic pancreatic cancer prior to induction chemotherapy.

\*According to the Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Group (DPCG) definition: \>90 degrees arterial tumor involvement (i.e. superior mesenteric artery, celiac axis, and/or hepatic artery) and/or portovenous involvement of either \>270 degrees or occlusion.

Implementation - International best-practice care

Intervention Type OTHER

The PREOPANC-4 project aims to safely implement the international standard of excellence for LAPC management and surgery using a multidisciplinary best-practice training program, based on the experiences of four leading international expert centers (i.e. NYU Langone Health, University of Colorado, Heidelberg University, and MD Anderson Cancer Center). We hypothesize that the PREOPANC-4 implementation project will result in the improvement in multidisciplinary patient management and selection in line with current international best-practice.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Implementation - International best-practice care

The PREOPANC-4 project aims to safely implement the international standard of excellence for LAPC management and surgery using a multidisciplinary best-practice training program, based on the experiences of four leading international expert centers (i.e. NYU Langone Health, University of Colorado, Heidelberg University, and MD Anderson Cancer Center). We hypothesize that the PREOPANC-4 implementation project will result in the improvement in multidisciplinary patient management and selection in line with current international best-practice.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age 18 years or older
* Pathology-confirmed (LAPC)\*
* CT-based non-progressive disease (RECIST criteria) after at least 4 months of systemic chemotherapy (\[m\]FOLFIRINOX / gemcitabine-nab-paclitaxel).

Exclusion Criteria

* Metastatic pancreatic cancer prior to induction chemotherapy.

* According to the Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Group (DPCG) definition: \>90 degrees arterial tumor involvement (i.e. superior mesenteric artery, celiac axis, and/or hepatic artery) and/or portovenous involvement of either \>270 degrees or occlusion.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

UMC Utrecht

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Erasmus Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Leiden University Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University Medical Center Groningen

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Radboud University Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Maastricht University Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Medisch Spectrum Twente

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Isala

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Frisius Medisch Centrum

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Amphia ziekenhuis

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Jeroen Bosch Ziekenhuis

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Catharina Ziekenhuis Eindhoven

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Colorado, Denver

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Heidelberg University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

M.D. Anderson Cancer Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

NYU Langone Health

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Dutch Cancer Society

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Maag Lever Darm Stichting

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Deltaplan Alvleesklierkanker

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

M.G. Besselink

prof. dr. M.G. Besselink

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Marc G Besselink, MD, MSc, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Amsterdam UMC, locatie AMC

Amsterdam, North Holland, Netherlands

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Netherlands

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Thomas F Stoop, MD

Role: CONTACT

+316 547 555 11

Marc G Besselink, MD, MSc, PhD

Role: CONTACT

+316 16 15 83 45

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Marc G Besselink, MD, MSc, PhD

Role: primary

Thomas F Stoop, MD

Role: backup

+316 547 555 11

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Stoop TF, Seelen LWF, van 't Land FR, van der Hout AC, Scheepens JCM, Ali M, Stiggelbout AM, van der Kolk BM, Bonsing BA, Lips DJ, de Groot DJA, van Veldhuisen E, Kerver ED, Manusama ER, Daams F, Kazemier G, Cirkel GA, van Tienhoven G, Patijn GA, Lelieveld-Rier HN, de Hingh IH, van Hellemond IEG, Wijsman JH, Erdmann JI, Mieog JSD, de Vos-Geelen J, de Groot JWB, Lutchman KRD, Mekenkamp LJ, Kranenburg LW, Beuk LPM, Nijkamp MW, den Dulk M, Polee MB, Homs MYV, Wumkes ML, Stommel MWJ, Busch OR, de Wilde RF, Theijse RT, Luelmo SAC, Festen S, Bollen TL, Neumann UP, de Meijer VE, Draaisma WA, Groot Koerkamp B, Molenaar IQ, Wolfgang CL, Del Chiaro M, Katz MGH, Hackert T, Rietjens JAC, Wilmink JW, van Santvoort HC, van Eijck CHJ, Besselink MG; Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Group. Nationwide implementation of the international multidisciplinary best-practice for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (PREOPANC-4): study protocol. BMC Cancer. 2025 Feb 19;25(1):299. doi: 10.1186/s12885-025-13554-w.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 39972248 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

W21_487 # 21.541

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.