Combining Ultrasound and Biomarkers to Diagnose Superficial Endometriosis

NCT ID: NCT05523284

Last Updated: 2026-02-12

Basic Information

• Recruitment Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
• Total Enrollment: 50 participants
• Study Classification: OBSERVATIONAL
• Study Start Date: 2023-11-15
• Study Completion Date: 2026-12-30

Brief Summary

Endometriosis is a benign gynecological disease characterized by uterine-like cells growing outside the uterus, leading to pain, infertility, and inflammation. Endometriosis most commonly occurs in the forms of Superficial Endometriosis (SE), Deep Endometriosis and Ovarian Endometriosis (Endometrioma) (OE). Ultrasound diagnosis of DE and OE has become more reliable with advances in ultrasound technology, technique and expertise, leading to decreased diagnosis time for patients and allowing for better optimization of surgeries if required. SE, however, lacks any reliable non-invasive diagnosis methods.

SE is the most common form of endometriosis and is defined as a disease that lines the peritoneum and is small and superficial in nature, leading to chronic inflammation, infertility, and pain. SE is difficult to visualize on ultrasound due to its size and alignment with tissue, requiring fluid to expand the pelvis and partially suspend these small lesions, allowing them to be diagnosed through ultrasound. Leonardi et al. observed that in some patients, a physiologic change occurs whereby fluid fills the pouch of Douglas (POD), allowing increased visualizing during ultrasound. This led to the development of Saline-infused sonoPODgraphy (SPG), a novel method utilizing modified commonly used ultrasound techniques called saline-infusion sonohysterography (SIS) and hysterosalpingo-contrast-sonography (HyCoSy), to reliably visualize the POD (Leonardi et al, 2019). Visualizing the POD is important as SE is often deposited in the POD.

This diagnostic accuracy pilot study aims to pioneer the technique whereby SPG will be evaluated as a novel, rapid, non-invasive diagnostic tool for SE. The injected fluid from the POD will be withdrawn and evaluated for novel biomarkers, allowing us to further develop rapid diagnostics and better understand disease mechanisms. We hypothesize that SPG will allow for the diagnosis of SE with a diagnostic accuracy parallel to the current invasive gold standard, laparoscopy.

Detailed Description

Introduction Endometriosis is a common benign disease characterized by the growth of uterine cells outside of the uterus, causing various forms of pelvic pain and/or difficulty with conceiving a pregnancy, amongst other symptoms. Endometriosis most commonly occurs in the forms of Superficial Endometriosis (SE), Deep Endometriosis and Ovarian Endometriosis (Endometrioma) (OE). Ultrasound diagnosis of DE and OE has become more reliable with advances in ultrasound technology, technique and expertise leading to decreased diagnosis time for patients and allowing for better optimization of surgeries if required. SE, however, lacks any reliable non-invasive diagnosis methods.

SE is the most common form of endometriosis and is defined as a disease that lines the peritoneum and is small and superficial in nature, leading to chronic inflammation, infertility, and pain. SE is difficult to visualize on ultrasound due to its size and alignment with tissue, requiring fluid in order expand the pelvis and partially suspend these small lesions, allowing them to be diagnosed through ultrasound. Leonardi et al. observed that in some patients, a physiologic change occurs whereby fluid fills the pouch of Douglas (POD) allowing increased visualizing during ultrasound. This led to the development of Saline-infused sonoPODgraphy (SPG), a novel method utilizing modified commonly used ultrasound techniques called saline-infusion sonohysterography (SIS) and hysterosalpingo-contrast-sonography (HyCoSy), to reliably visualize the POD. The ability to visualize the POD is important as SE is often deposited in the POD.

Biomarkers are also an active area of research in endometriosis diagnosis. There are possible biomarkers that have been identified in the peritoneal fluid of people with endometriosis, including Tumour Necrosis Factor (TNF) and interleukin-6 (IL-6). Indeed, a landmark biomarker study in 2002 demonstrated that TNF in peritoneal fluid had a 100% sensitivity for identifying women with endometriosis. However, this finding has never been further evaluated or validated, even though there is evidence of TNF involvement in endometriosis development. Recently, insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) has been noted to be elevated in the peritoneal fluid of people with endometriosis compared to those without. Further, IGF-1 has also been found to contribute to the development of abnormal nerves, which may explain the link between endometriosis and pain.

The previous work with POD imaging combined with the knowledge of endometriosis biomarkers leads to the question: Can these non-invasive diagnostic methods be combined to diagnose superficial endometriosis accurately and consistently. We hypothesize that using a combined approach of SPG and biomarker analysis to diagnose superficial endometriosis will provide sufficient evidence to support a large multi-centre international diagnostic accuracy trial.

Technical Study Summary

Study Design

This diagnostic accuracy feasibility study is a Health Canada-sponsored study whereby fluid will be injected through the cervix among recruited and consented participants. During routine clinical visits at the McMaster Women's Health Clinic, participants will be recruited on a rolling basis. The study will start in October 2022 and will continue until the intended sample size is reached and/or January 2024

Sample size

In this feasibility trial, we aim to recruit all patients who meet the eligibility criteria over 14 months from the McMaster University Medical Center. Given the previous publication on SPG and SE by Leonardi et al (2020), based on an estimated prevalence of SE of 60 % and sensitivity of 80 %, and a half-width of 95 % CI of 0.15 (i.e. the sensitivity cannot be lower than 0.65), a total of 50 participants will be required.

Variables

In addition to data regarding index and reference standard tests, demographic and clinical information that is routinely collected will be obtained, including age, BMI, gravidity, parity, history of infertility (as defined by 1 year of trying to conceive without success), past medical history, past surgical history, use of hormonal agents for contraception or treatment of gynecological concern, menstrual characteristics (last menstrual period (at time of TVS-C and surgery), cycle frequency, duration of menses, abnormal uterine bleeding). Previous sexually transmitted and blood-borne infections (STBBI) results will be assessed as potential differential diagnoses when adhesions are present in the absence of endometriosis upon surgery.

During TVS, the disease will be characterized for each patient using the Leonardi et al (2020) modified descriptors for SE under TVS, including size, location, hyperechoic projections, hypoechoic areas, cystic areas, filmy adhesions, peritoneal pockets, and jiggling of the lesion. These characteristics will then be compared to surgical findings using the validated and internationally recognized WERF Surgical questionnaire as categorical data. Due to previous findings in the Leonardi et al (2020) study suggests that SPG may be unsuccessful (SPG fluid filling the POD) in a small portion of the population (5.6%; excluding those with POD obliteration), and the rate of success will be recorded and reported as part of the diagnostic accuracy and indicative of the efficacy of the technique. However, in the event of unsuccessful SPG, tubal patency assessment will be performed at laparoscopy with dye chromotubation to assess whether the bilateral tubal blockage was the reason for the failure of SPG. As there is a slight possibility of having physiological fluid accumulated in the POD before SPG, an estimate of volume will be made under TVS for those with fluid present (calculated using a length x width x height approach, which is the generally accepted method to calculate the volume of pelvic fluid). The volume of SPG fluid injected will be recorded as a continuous variable for each participant. Upon the completion of the study, the volumes will be categorized into groups, allowing for subgroup analysis.

Following the TVS-C, participants will be asked to complete a short questionnaire on their tolerability and acceptance of the procedure. Similarly, following laparoscopy, patients will be asked to answer the same series of questions regarding the laparoscopy and to re-evaluate the TVS-C, having had both procedures to compare.

Statistical analysis

Sensitivity, specificity, positive, and negative predictive values will be calculated for SPG and identified biomarkers in the aspirated fluid. The demographic and clinical variables, peritoneal fluid features and TNF levels, TVS and surgical findings will be described descriptively using standardized terminology for all participants per routine clinical guidelines and assessed as categorical data upon data cleaning. The success of the acquisition of peritoneal fluid will be described. Subgroup analysis will be done with those who had serosanguinous peritoneal fluid.

Conditions

Endometriosis (Diagnosis); Endometriosis

Study Design

• Observational Model Type: OTHER
• Study Time Perspective: PROSPECTIVE

Interventions

SonoPODography

SonoPODography (SPG) is a novel ultrasound-guided technique whereby saline is injected through the cervix and flushed into the POD, creating an acoustic window for diagnosing superficial endometriosis.

Intervention Type: DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

• 18 Years of Age
• Assigned Female at Birth
• Confirmed or Suspected Case of Superficial Endometriosis
• Willing and Able to Provide Informed Written Consent

Exclusion Criteria

• Pre-Menarche or Post-Menopausal
• No History of Vaginal Penetration / Intercourse
• Concern for pre-malignancy or presence/history of malignancy
• Known Bleeding Disorder
• Presence of Deep or Ovarian Endometriosis

• Minimum Eligible Age: 18 Years
• Eligible Sex: FEMALE
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: Yes

Sponsors

McMaster University

OTHER

Sponsor Role: lead

Responsible Party

Responsibility Role: SPONSOR

Locations

McMaster University

Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

Countries

Canada

References

Piessens S, Edwards A. Sonographic Evaluation for Endometriosis in Routine Pelvic Ultrasound. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2020 Feb;27(2):265-266. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2019.08.027. Epub 2019 Sep 4.

Reference Type: RESULT

PMID: 31493569 (View on PubMed)

Leonardi M, Robledo KP, Espada M, Vanza K, Condous G. SonoPODography: A new diagnostic technique for visualizing superficial endometriosis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2020 Nov;254:124-131. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.08.051. Epub 2020 Sep 16.

Reference Type: RESULT

PMID: 32961428 (View on PubMed)

Chapron C, Tosti C, Marcellin L, Bourdon M, Lafay-Pillet MC, Millischer AE, Streuli I, Borghese B, Petraglia F, Santulli P. Relationship between the magnetic resonance imaging appearance of adenomyosis and endometriosis phenotypes. Hum Reprod. 2017 Jul 1;32(7):1393-1401. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dex088.

Reference Type: RESULT

PMID: 28510724 (View on PubMed)

Cheong YC, Shelton JB, Laird SM, Richmond M, Kudesia G, Li TC, Ledger WL. IL-1, IL-6 and TNF-alpha concentrations in the peritoneal fluid of women with pelvic adhesions. Hum Reprod. 2002 Jan;17(1):69-75. doi: 10.1093/humrep/17.1.69.

Reference Type: RESULT

PMID: 11756364 (View on PubMed)

Deslandes A, Parange N, Childs JT, Osborne B, Bezak E. Current Status of Transvaginal Ultrasound Accuracy in the Diagnosis of Deep Infiltrating Endometriosis Before Surgery: A Systematic Review of the Literature. J Ultrasound Med. 2020 Aug;39(8):1477-1490. doi: 10.1002/jum.15246. Epub 2020 Feb 21.

Reference Type: RESULT

PMID: 32083336 (View on PubMed)

Forster R, Sarginson A, Velichkova A, Hogg C, Dorning A, Horne AW, Saunders PTK, Greaves E. Macrophage-derived insulin-like growth factor-1 is a key neurotrophic and nerve-sensitizing factor in pain associated with endometriosis. FASEB J. 2019 Oct;33(10):11210-11222. doi: 10.1096/fj.201900797R. Epub 2019 Jul 10.

Reference Type: RESULT

PMID: 31291762 (View on PubMed)

Goncalves MO, Siufi Neto J, Andres MP, Siufi D, de Mattos LA, Abrao MS. Systematic evaluation of endometriosis by transvaginal ultrasound can accurately replace diagnostic laparoscopy, mainly for deep and ovarian endometriosis. Hum Reprod. 2021 May 17;36(6):1492-1500. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deab085.

Reference Type: RESULT

PMID: 33864088 (View on PubMed)

Leonardi M, Espada M, Lu C, Stamatopoulos N, Condous G. A Novel Ultrasound Technique Called Saline Infusion SonoPODography to Visualize and Understand the Pouch of Douglas and Posterior Compartment Contents: A Feasibility Study. J Ultrasound Med. 2019 Dec;38(12):3301-3309. doi: 10.1002/jum.15022. Epub 2019 May 15.

Reference Type: RESULT

PMID: 31090229 (View on PubMed)

Reis FM, Santulli P, Marcellin L, Borghese B, Lafay-Pillet MC, Chapron C. Superficial Peritoneal Endometriosis: Clinical Characteristics of 203 Confirmed Cases and 1292 Endometriosis-Free Controls. Reprod Sci. 2020 Jan;27(1):309-315. doi: 10.1007/s43032-019-00028-1. Epub 2020 Jan 1.

Reference Type: RESULT

PMID: 32046376 (View on PubMed)

Vercellini P, Vigano P, Somigliana E, Fedele L. Endometriosis: pathogenesis and treatment. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2014 May;10(5):261-75. doi: 10.1038/nrendo.2013.255. Epub 2013 Dec 24.

Reference Type: RESULT

PMID: 24366116 (View on PubMed)

Vitonis AF, Vincent K, Rahmioglu N, Fassbender A, Buck Louis GM, Hummelshoj L, Giudice LC, Stratton P, Adamson GD, Becker CM, Zondervan KT, Missmer SA; WERF EPHect Working Group. World Endometriosis Research Foundation Endometriosis Phenome and Biobanking Harmonization Project: II. Clinical and covariate phenotype data collection in endometriosis research. Fertil Steril. 2014 Nov;102(5):1223-32. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.07.1244. Epub 2014 Sep 22.

Reference Type: RESULT

PMID: 25256930 (View on PubMed)

Zondervan KT, Becker CM, Missmer SA. Endometriosis. N Engl J Med. 2020 Mar 26;382(13):1244-1256. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1810764. No abstract available.

Reference Type: RESULT

PMID: 32212520 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

LRG - SPGENDO

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id