Rectal Water-contrast Transvaginal Ultrasonography Versus Sonovaginography for the Diagnosis of Posterior Deep Pelvic Endometriosis
NCT ID: NCT04296760
Last Updated: 2020-11-17
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
250 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2018-01-01
2020-11-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_ONLY
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Women with suspicious of deep posterior pelvic endometriosis
Rectal water-contrast transvaginal ultrasonography
Transvaginal ultrasound scan combined with the introduction of saline solution into the rectum
Sonovaginography
Transvaginal ultrasound scan combined with the introduction of saline solution into the vagina
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Rectal water-contrast transvaginal ultrasonography
Transvaginal ultrasound scan combined with the introduction of saline solution into the rectum
Sonovaginography
Transvaginal ultrasound scan combined with the introduction of saline solution into the vagina
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* previous surgical diagnosis of posterior deep infiltrating endometriosis
18 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Fabio Barra
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Fabio Barra
MD
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Fabio Barra, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Ospedale Policlinico San Martino
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Ospedale Policlinico San Martino
Genoa, , Italy
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Leone Roberti Maggiore U, Biscaldi E, Vellone VG, Venturini PL, Ferrero S. Magnetic resonance enema vs rectal water-contrast transvaginal sonography in diagnosis of rectosigmoid endometriosis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Apr;49(4):524-532. doi: 10.1002/uog.15934.
Ferrero S, Biscaldi E, Vellone VG, Venturini PL, Leone Roberti Maggiore U. Computed tomographic colonography vs rectal water- contrast transvaginal sonography in diagnosis of rectosigmoid endometriosis: a pilot study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Apr;49(4):515-523. doi: 10.1002/uog.15905.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
ENHANCED-ETV-ENDO
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id