Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
314 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-09-21
2023-12-07
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Evaluation of Teen Connection Project for Trans and Gender Minority Youth
NCT06587139
Increasing Effective Mental Health Care for LGBT Clients
NCT05352659
Study of Long-term Efficacy and Mechanisms Underlying the Impact of a Web-based Sexual and Relationship Health Promotion Program With Young Adult Community College Students
NCT04950686
Proximal Effects of Alcohol on Same-Sex Intimate Partner Violence
NCT04625465
Suicide Prevention for Sexual and Gender Minority Youth (Randomized Controlled Trial)
NCT05669976
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Prevention programming that targets proximal minority stressors and sense of community, in conjunction with evidence-based DV and AU prevention programming components (e.g., bystander intervention, refusal skills, correcting misperceptions of social norms, protective behavioral strategies), could reduce rates of DV and AU among SGMY. Also, because minority stress and sense of community are risk factors in the etiological pathways to other problematic health behaviors (e.g., sexual risk-taking), reducing minority stress, and increasing a sense of community among SGMY presumably may decrease other risk behaviors (e.g., drug use) and depressive symptoms. To date, however, no such programming exists for SGMY. In fact, DV and AU prevention programming has been widely criticized for lacking inclusive information for, as well as representations of, SGMY and universal DV programs do not work for SGMY. Further, although not specific to SGMY, universal DV programs do not work for youth of color, and SGMY of color experience the highest rates of DV and AU, underscoring the urgency for which DV and AU prevention programs for multiply minoritized SGMY, including those in hard to reach areas (e.g., rural communities), are needed.
Following a Stage 1A and 1B model, the proposed project seeks to develop and evaluate via a randomized controlled pilot study an online DV and AU prevention initiative for SGMY (15 to 18 years old), entitled Promoting Resilient Youth with Strong Hearts and Minds (PRYSHM). The PRYSHM program is theoretically grounded, follows best practices for effective health behavior prevention, and includes eight one hour sessions co-facilitated by two LGBTQIA2S+ adults. Use of synchronous online delivery via web-based teleconference was selected for PRYSHM given that a notable portion of SGMY are not out and thus may not have the opportunity to participate in an in-person program. This could be especially true for youth living in rural and remote areas of the U.S. where rates of minority stress are highest and sense of community is lowest (of note, the vast majority of youth in rural areas own smartphones). Also, research suggests that more than half of SGMY (both out and not-out youth) are members of an online LGBTQIA2S+ community, further underscoring the probable utility, scalability, and cost-effectiveness of online delivery of the PRYSHM.
Specific Aims of this R34 intervention development grant are as follows:
Aim 1: Development Phase: Finalize and refine PRYSHM materials through key informant feedback (i.e., SGMY advisory board, experts in the field) (Aim 1a) and conduct an open pilot trial with ten dating SGMY (Aim 1b).
Aim 2: Pilot Evaluation Phase: Recruit 300 dating SGMY via social media and other online advertisements and randomly assign them to a wait-list control condition (n = 100) or PRYSHM condition (n = 200) (Aim 2a). Assess acceptability and feasibility of the program and research procedures via post-session surveys, program observations, and online exit interviews with a subsample of youth (n = 20 or until saturation is achieved) (Aim 2b). Pre-, immediate, and 3-month posttests will be used to assess the acceptability of the study procedures (e.g., compliance with surveys) and generate initial data on the efficacy of PRYSHM in reducing DV and AU (Aim 2c). Exploratory analyses will examine mediators (e.g., sense of community, ethnic/racial cultural identity) and moderators (e.g., demographics \[race/ethnicity, gender identity, dosage\]) of treatment effects. Guided by intersectional literature that suggests not using comparative methods and sample size limitations, we will examine the treatment effects within groups of SGMY of color to determine promise of efficacy (Aim 2d).
This project is highly significant as it: (1) addresses DV and AU and related deleterious health behaviors (critical U.S. public health problems) among multiply minoritized SGMY; (2) can reach SGMY in rural and remote regions of the U.S. who experience the highest rates of minority stress and lowest sense of community; and (3) tests a scalable prevention strategy with the potential for paramount public health impact. This study is innovative as it is the first to test the effects of a group-based, online synchronous DV and AU prevention program tailored explicitly for diverse SGMY.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Treatment Condition
The PRYSHM program is theoretically grounded, follows best practices for effective health behavior prevention, and includes nine, one hour sessions co-facilitated by 2 LGBTQ+ adults.
Promoting Resilient Youth with Strong Hearts and Minds (PRYSHM)
The intervention focuses on psycho-education (provision of accurate information about LGBTQIA2S+ people, education about the effects of alcohol), fostering positive identity development for LGBTQIA2S+ youth (e.g., fostering pride in identity, exposure to positive adult role models), teaching of alcohol use and sexual refusal skills, correction of inaccurate social norms about alcohol use and dating violence, teaching assertive communication skills, teaching emotion coping skills, mindfulness and grounding skills, and teaching bystander intervention skills related to dating/sexual violence and alcohol use..
Control
Check-ins/provision of resources
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Promoting Resilient Youth with Strong Hearts and Minds (PRYSHM)
The intervention focuses on psycho-education (provision of accurate information about LGBTQIA2S+ people, education about the effects of alcohol), fostering positive identity development for LGBTQIA2S+ youth (e.g., fostering pride in identity, exposure to positive adult role models), teaching of alcohol use and sexual refusal skills, correction of inaccurate social norms about alcohol use and dating violence, teaching assertive communication skills, teaching emotion coping skills, mindfulness and grounding skills, and teaching bystander intervention skills related to dating/sexual violence and alcohol use..
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Age between 15 and 18 years.
* Ability to read and speak in English.
* Current residence in the United States.
* Consistent access to an electronic device (e.g., smartphone, tablet, computer) with high speed Internet access and/or Wi-Fi.
* Ability to attend 9 weekly, one hour online intervention sessions.
* Recent or currently in a dating/romantic/sexual relationship (past three months).
* Not at high risk for suicide (as defined by not endorsing a critical item on a past-month suicide screening measure \[SBQ-R\], and/or not be deemed at elevated risk for suicide on the basis of a clinical interview,)
Exclusion Criteria
* Identify as heterosexual and cisgender.
* Current enrollment as a full-time college student.
* Lack of English language proficiency (either written and/or spoken).
* Current residence outside of the U.S.
* No current or recent (in past three months) dating/romantic/sexual relationship.
* No consistent access to an electronic device (e.g., smartphone, tablet, computer) with high speed Internet or Wi-Fi.
* Inability to attend scheduled weekly one hour intervention sessions.
* Elevated risk of suicidality (reporting a past month suicide attempt or past month suicide threat with intent to die on the SBQ-R or determined to be at elevated current risk for suicidality based on a clinical interview).
15 Years
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Houston
OTHER
University of Colorado, Colorado Springs
OTHER
National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA)
NIH
University of Nebraska Lincoln
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Nebraska (Lincoln)
Lincoln, Nebraska, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Kertzner RM, Meyer IH, Frost DM, Stirratt MJ. Social and psychological well-being in lesbians, gay men, and bisexuals: the effects of race, gender, age, and sexual identity. Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2009 Oct;79(4):500-10. doi: 10.1037/a0016848.
Edwards KM, Sylaska KM. The perpetration of intimate partner violence among LGBTQ college youth: the role of minority stress. J Youth Adolesc. 2013 Nov;42(11):1721-31. doi: 10.1007/s10964-012-9880-6. Epub 2012 Dec 12.
Lewis RJ, Millentich RJ, Kelley ML, Woody A. Minority stress, substance use, and intimate partner violence among sexual minority women. Aggression and Violent Behavior. 2012;17:247-256.
Edwards KM, Banyard VL, Sessarego SN. Dating and sexual violence victimization and perpetration among high school youth: Incidence and correlates. Manuscript in preparation. 2017.
Edwards KM. Incidence and Outcomes of Dating Violence Victimization Among High School Youth: The Role of Gender and Sexual Orientation. J Interpers Violence. 2018 May;33(9):1472-1490. doi: 10.1177/0886260515618943. Epub 2015 Dec 13.
Vagi KJ, O'Malley Olsen E, Basile KC, Vivolo-Kantor AM. Teen Dating Violence (Physical and Sexual) Among US High School Students: Findings From the 2013 National Youth Risk Behavior Survey. JAMA Pediatr. 2015 May;169(5):474-82. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2014.3577.
Baiocco R, D'Alessio M, Laghi F. Binge drinking among gay, and lesbian youths: The role of internalized sexual stigma, self-disclosure, and individuals' sense of connectedness to the gay community. Addict Behav. 2010 Oct;35(10):896-9. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2010.06.004. Epub 2010 Jun 11.
Eisenberg ME, Toumbourou JW, Catalano RF, Hemphill SA. Social norms in the development of adolescent substance use: a longitudinal analysis of the International Youth Development Study. J Youth Adolesc. 2014 Sep;43(9):1486-97. doi: 10.1007/s10964-014-0111-1. Epub 2014 Mar 15.
Mason TB, Lewis RJ, Gargurevich M, Kelley ML. Minority stress and intimate partner violence perpetration among lesbians: Negative affect, hazardous drinking, and intrusiveness as mediators. Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity. 2016;3(2):236-246.
Edwards KM, Sylaska KM, Neal AM. Intimate partner violence among sexual minority populations: A critical review of the literature and agenda for future research. Psychology of Violence. 2015;5(2):112-121.
Lin Y, J., Israel T. Development and validation of a psychological sense of LGBT community scale. Journal of Community Psychology. 2012;40(5):14.
Dank M, Lachman P, Zweig JM, Yahner J. Dating violence experiences of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender youth. J Youth Adolesc. 2014 May;43(5):846-57. doi: 10.1007/s10964-013-9975-8. Epub 2013 Jul 17.
Noar SM, Pierce LB, Black HG. Can computer-mediated interventions change theortical mediators of safer sex? A meta-analysis. Human Communication Research. 2010;36:36.
Bennett S, Banyard VL, Edwards KM. The Impact of the Bystander's Relationship With the Victim and the Perpetrator on Intent to Help in Situations Involving Sexual Violence. J Interpers Violence. 2017 Mar;32(5):682-702. doi: 10.1177/0886260515586373. Epub 2016 Jul 11.
Growing up LGBT in America: NCOD report. Human Rights Campaignn.
GLSEN. The 2015 national school climate survey: Executive summary. GLSEN;2015.
Lenhart A. A majority of American teens report access to a computer, game console, smartphone and a tablet. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center. 2015.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol
Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan
Document Type: Informed Consent Form
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
21985IRB
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.