An Investigation of Nomothetic Versus Idiographic Assessment in Chronic Pain
NCT ID: NCT05518630
Last Updated: 2022-11-09
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
600 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2022-10-05
2023-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Personality, Defences, Central Sensitization, and Trauma in Women With Chronic Migraine, Fibromyalgia, and Vulvodynia
NCT06138171
Assessment of Psychological Symptoms Among Fibromyalgia Patients
NCT05557500
Relieving Chronic Pain: Psychosomatic Mechanisms and Psychological Interventions in Fibromyalgia and Chronic Headache
NCT06652724
Retrospective Study of Psychoattitudinal Patterns in Patients With Fibromyalgia Receiving Antalgic Therapy
NCT04623827
Hypnosis as a Treatment of Chronic Widespread Pain in General Practice. A Pilot Study.
NCT00521807
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The present study aims to investigate the relationship between pain intensity, psychological flexibility, pain functioning, catastrophizing, and depressive symptoms in people with endometriosis, vulvodynia, and fibromyalgia. The investigators want to investigate how these factors relate to each other over time, but also whether there is a difference between people who are in contact with health care for these conditions and those who are not, and whether there is a difference depending on which of the included pain conditions one has.
Another aim of the project is to investigate whether the variables the investigators intend to measure meet the criteria for group-to-individual generalizability, meaning that group means and correlation coefficients based on aggregated group data also apply to individuals and that it is reasonable to draw conclusions about individuals from group data. Many psychological variables do not meet the criteria for this type of generalizability. By examining whether the results from variables can be generalized from a group level to an individual level, the investigators will gain clues about how much individualization is required in future research, assessments, and treatments for the pain conditions included in the current project.
In order to investigate group-to-individual generalizability, the project requires a large sample of participants to obtain group averages but also a large number of repeated measurements over a longer period of time for each participant. Repeated measurements from each individual are planned to be carried out to obtain individual mean values, in order to compare this with the group data. A diary will be created which is intended to be used daily, and a further aim of this study is to evaluate whether this diary is valid to use for future studies in these pain conditions.
On the first day of the study, participants will complete forms collecting demographic and background information, including information about the participants' pain.
On the first as well as the last day, information will also be collected from standardized questionnaires, including the Multidimensional Psychological Flexibility Inventory (MPFI), Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), and Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS).
On the second day of the study, participants will start to fill in twice daily measures at fixed times, and with a 12-hour interval between these two daily measurements. These are based on an ecological momentary assessment approach (EMA), where frequently repeated measurements are taken in the natural environment of the research subjects and where the time that participants have to think back on when answering is kept short. Using EMA, the within-individual variation can be easily monitored over time. The daily measurements will be collected for 42 days. The measurements consist of items from MPFI, BPI, PHQ-2, and PCS. In addition, two items are developed by the research team to assess sexual functioning and energy levels.
Participants will also fill out a weekly diary administered six times in total. The weekly diary consists of three items asking the participant to rate the previous week, and indicate whether something out of the ordinary has happened.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
OTHER
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Nomothetic Versus Idiographic Assessment in Chronic Pain
Participants with either endometriosis, vulvodynia, and/or fibromyalgia will answer a twice-daily diary for 42 days and a short weekly diary six times in total. In addition, they will answer two longer surveys at the start and at the end of the 42 days. These questionnaires ask about psychological flexibility, depression, catastrophizing, and pain interference. The data collected is only observational and does not include any intervention.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Reporting diagnoses of endometriosis, vulvodynia, or fibromyalgia
* The pain condition present persistently or recurrently during ≥ 3 months
* Access to an internet-enabled smartphone/tablet
* Fluent in written Swedish
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Uppsala University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Monica Buhrman, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Uppsala University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Department of Psychology, Uppsala University
Uppsala, Uppland, Sweden
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
20220516
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.