Tolerance and Efficacy of Amiklin Administration During Nosocomial Infections Complicating COVID-19 in the ICU

NCT ID: NCT05511129

Last Updated: 2022-08-26

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Total Enrollment

1053 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-05-12

Study Completion Date

2023-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The most severe infectious episodes are managed in intensive care. Classically, a distinction is made between sepsis, an infection associated with an inappropriate, excessive response of the immune system, responsible for organ dysfunction, and septic shock, during which, within the potential dysfunctions, hemodynamic alteration is central, requiring the introduction of catecholamines. The seriousness of these disorders, particularly because of their potential short-term severity, requires immediate treatment. The treatment of severe infections is based on the control of microbial proliferation, particularly bacterial. In this context, the speed of antibiotic therapy is associated with patient prognosis. If the administration of antibiotic therapy is an emergency during severe infections, particularly in situations of septic shock, its choice is decisive in the effectiveness of management and in the prognosis of the patient. Prior to microbiological results, antibacterial treatment is probabilistic. In spite of these numerous parameters, failure of probabilistic antibiotic therapy, due to a spectrum unsuited to the pathogens, is described in 15 to 30% of cases. In order to limit the risk of inappropriate treatment, it is recommended that broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy be used in states of shock of infectious origin. Because of their bactericidal properties, their kinetics of effectiveness, their marked post-antibiotic effect, their bioavailability in the plasma sector, and their synergy with beta-lactams, aminoglycosides are often recommended in combination in the initial probabilistic treatment. Despite numerous studies and extensive international experience with aminoglycosides, their real value in the management of severe infections remains uncertain, leading to contradictory information depending on whether one is interested in their benefit in the treatment of identified infections or in the probabilistic treatment of severe conditions.

During the management of severe intensive care patients, the pharmacokinetics of drugs, especially antibiotics, are considerably modified. As a result, monitoring of plasma, or better, tissue concentrations of antibiotics is suggested by learned societies, although their practical realization is still very limited by numerous obstacles.

Misuse of aminoglycosides is associated with a risk of acute renal failure, centered on the tubular toxicity of the antibiotic. While the risks associated with inappropriate frequency of administration are currently modest, those associated with high peak concentration, responsible for an increase in the duration of renal exposure, are not well known.

COVID-19 is also associated with a high risk of impaired renal function. The effect of aminoglycoside administration in the context of COVID-19 remains unknown. Our goal is to determine whether the presence of COVID-19 associates with an elevated risk of renal failure when prescribing aminoglycoside.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

COVID-19 Nosocomial Infection

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patient with age ≥ 18 years
* Hospitalization for respiratory Covid-19
* Patient hospitalized in the ICU or Respiratory Department for a PCR-confirmed respiratory infection with COVID-19
* French-speaking patient

Exclusion Criteria

* Patient with a severe psychiatric disorder
* A dying patient
* Patient under guardianship or curatorship
* Patient deprived of liberty
* Patient under court protection
* Patient objecting to the use of his or her data for this research
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Fondation Hôpital Saint-Joseph

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

François PHILIPPART, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Fondation Hôpital Saint-Joseph

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint-Joseph

Paris, , France

Site Status

Centre Hospitalier Bicetre

Paris, , France

Site Status

Hôpital Cochin

Paris, , France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, Shankar-Hari M, Annane D, Bauer M, Bellomo R, Bernard GR, Chiche JD, Coopersmith CM, Hotchkiss RS, Levy MM, Marshall JC, Martin GS, Opal SM, Rubenfeld GD, van der Poll T, Vincent JL, Angus DC. The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):801-10. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0287.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26903338 (View on PubMed)

Prescott HC, Angus DC. Enhancing Recovery From Sepsis: A Review. JAMA. 2018 Jan 2;319(1):62-75. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.17687.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29297082 (View on PubMed)

Brun-Buisson C, Meshaka P, Pinton P, Vallet B; EPISEPSIS Study Group. EPISEPSIS: a reappraisal of the epidemiology and outcome of severe sepsis in French intensive care units. Intensive Care Med. 2004 Apr;30(4):580-8. doi: 10.1007/s00134-003-2121-4. Epub 2004 Mar 2.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 14997295 (View on PubMed)

Pletz MW, Blasi F, Chalmers JD, Dela Cruz CS, Feldman C, Luna CM, Ramirez JA, Shindo Y, Stolz D, Torres A, Webb B, Welte T, Wunderink R, Aliberti S. International Perspective on the New 2019 American Thoracic Society/Infectious Diseases Society of America Community-Acquired Pneumonia Guideline: A Critical Appraisal by a Global Expert Panel. Chest. 2020 Nov;158(5):1912-1918. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2020.07.089. Epub 2020 Aug 25.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32858009 (View on PubMed)

Kumar A, Roberts D, Wood KE, Light B, Parrillo JE, Sharma S, Suppes R, Feinstein D, Zanotti S, Taiberg L, Gurka D, Kumar A, Cheang M. Duration of hypotension before initiation of effective antimicrobial therapy is the critical determinant of survival in human septic shock. Crit Care Med. 2006 Jun;34(6):1589-96. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000217961.75225.E9.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16625125 (View on PubMed)

Kumar A. Early antimicrobial therapy in severe sepsis and septic shock. Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2010 Sep;12(5):336-44. doi: 10.1007/s11908-010-0128-x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21308515 (View on PubMed)

Seymour CW, Kahn JM, Martin-Gill C, Callaway CW, Yealy DM, Scales D, Angus DC. Delays From First Medical Contact to Antibiotic Administration for Sepsis. Crit Care Med. 2017 May;45(5):759-765. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002264.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28234754 (View on PubMed)

Whiles BB, Deis AS, Simpson SQ. Increased Time to Initial Antimicrobial Administration Is Associated With Progression to Septic Shock in Severe Sepsis Patients. Crit Care Med. 2017 Apr;45(4):623-629. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002262.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28169944 (View on PubMed)

Skorup P, Maudsdotter L, Lipcsey M, Larsson A, Sjolin J. Mode of bacterial killing affects the inflammatory response and associated organ dysfunctions in a porcine E. coli intensive care sepsis model. Crit Care. 2020 Nov 14;24(1):646. doi: 10.1186/s13054-020-03303-9.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 33189146 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

ReaMax2

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

The Immunostimulatory Effects of Gentamicin
NCT05303909 TERMINATED PHASE2
Antiseptic Use and Dressing Application
NCT00389558 COMPLETED PHASE4