Efficacy of an App-based CBT Featuring Virtual Reality for Anxiety Disorders
NCT ID: NCT05510804
Last Updated: 2022-08-22
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
222 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2020-03-03
2023-03-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Study of Virtual Reality Therapy and Cognitive Behavior Therapy in Panic Disorder With Agoraphobia
NCT00129610
Improving the Exposure Therapy Through Projection-based Augmented Reality for the Treatment of Cockroach Phobia
NCT04553120
Improving the Efficacy of Exposure Therapy for the Treatment of Cockroach Phobia
NCT04563403
CBT Versus CBT With Virtual Reality Exposure for Social Anxiety Disorder and Agoraphobia
NCT03845101
Virtual Reality System to Increase Access to Exposure Therapy for Anxiety and OCD
NCT02713516
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Participants are diagnosed according to a structured clinical interview (SCID) by experienced and trained clinical psychologists. Then they are randomly allocated to either the intervention group (ALISA) or a control group offered supportive psychotherapy while being on a waiting list for a structured therapy programme of an outpatient unit for patients with anxiety disorders. The investigators hypothesize that participants receiving ALISA - as compared to controls - will present lower levels of anxiety and a higher quality of life at 6-month follow-up after start of the intervention, according to Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI, primary outcome measure) and WHO-QoL (L-1), respectively. Furthermore, the investigators hypothesize that the reduction of anxiety (ANOVA; group x time) can be shown at 1-year follow up. The investigators expect ALISA to be effective in each of the three disorder-specific therapy schedules (social phobia, panic disorder, agoraphobia w/without panic disorder). Therefore, disorder-specific symptom scales have been additionally adopted: Panic and Agoraphobia Scale (PAS) and Liebowitz Social Phobia Scale. Co-morbid depression and global functioning will be assessed using CGI and GAF as secondary outcome measures, respectively.
The allocation to the groups was conducted on the basis of random numbers generated by Microsoft Excel 2013 and with the restriction that the ratio of intervention to control group participants was 2:1. This unequal randomization was chosen for ethical reasons including a more reliable assessment of adverse events in the intervention group with a higher power. A planned sample size of n = 41 for each of the three diagnoses in the intervention group and n = 21 for each of the three diagnoses in the control group was calculated to detect a significant difference with an effect size of Cohens´s d = 0.9 with a probability of 90% and α = 2.5. Adding an estimated dropout-rate of 20%, each diagnosis group should include n = 49 participants in the intervention group and n = 25 in the control group, resulting in a total of N = 222 participants. (Multiple) imputation will be applied to deal with missing data. Results of Intention to treat analyses and following per protocol analyses will be reported.
Using records of cooperating health insurances, a health economic analysis of the intervention will be performed. Given that patients with untreated anxiety disorders show a markedly increased use of health system, a successful reduction of anxiety, once proven, should have an impact on patient's use of the health system in general (exploratory analysis)
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
ALISA (therapist-assisted digital self-help intervention)
structured app-based self-help programme with scheduled therapist assistance
ALISA
assisted self-help smartphone application featuring virtual reality within a structured CBT programme / low-frequency scheduled therapist assistance
TAU (supportive therapist contacts)
low-frequency supportive therapist contacts
ALISA
assisted self-help smartphone application featuring virtual reality within a structured CBT programme / low-frequency scheduled therapist assistance
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
ALISA
assisted self-help smartphone application featuring virtual reality within a structured CBT programme / low-frequency scheduled therapist assistance
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Smartphone availability
Exclusion Criteria
* angina pectoris
* cardiac arrhythmia
* untreated high blood pressure
* severe asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)
* (supposed) pregnancy
* severe visual impairment
* severe nausea and/or vestibular impairment
* epilepsy
* neuropsychiatric condition (i.e. dementia)
* psychiatric disorder associated with substance abuse
* psychotic disorder
* severe episode of major depression or manic episode
* suicidal ideation or behavior
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Zentrum für Integrative Psychiatrie
OTHER
Bartosz of Zurowski
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Bartosz of Zurowski
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Bartosz Zurowski
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Zentrum für Integrative Psychiatrie, Univ. of Luebeck
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Zentrum für Integrative Psychiatrie, Univ. of Kiel
Kiel, Schleswig-Holstein, Germany
Zentrum für Integrative Psychiatrie, Univ. of Lübeck
Lübeck, Schleswig-Holstein, Germany
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
AZ 19-187
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.