Temporal Window and Episodic Future Thinking in CUD

NCT ID: NCT05507814

Last Updated: 2025-12-02

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

141 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-11-30

Study Completion Date

2025-11-24

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The primary objective is to test the theory of Reinforcer Pathology via manipulation of the temporal window with successive Episodic Future Thinking generation in individuals with cocaine use disorder.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Adults with cocaine use disorder will be randomly assigned to experimental or control groups, stratified by polydrug use disorder, SES, and sex. The experimental group will compare episodic future thinking (EFT) to control episodic thinking (CET). The study procedures will include a baseline session (S1) and a 4-week intervention period where participants will return to the lab three times a week. Participants will generate new EFT and CET events at approximately weekly intervals. The EFT or CET events will be texted to them twice daily with urine samples obtained thrice-weekly. To probe resistance to disruption, both groups will receive stress-inducing probes that shorten the temporal window after the first and last cue generation. During the first assessment visit (S2), participants will be randomized with stratification to generate either episodic future thinking (EFT) or control episodic thinking (CET) events and will undergo neuroimaging procedures. At the following session in S3, participants will be randomized to receive one of two stress probes (counterbalanced) or their respective control. Participants will be exposed to a stress probe or control at S3 and the corresponding narrative at the next visit, S4. S5 and S6 will begin with participants generating new EFT/CET events that will be used for that session and the following two sessions. S7, like S2, will begin with EFT/CET event generation and neuroimaging procedures. During the final two sessions (S8, S9), participants will be exposed to the other stress probe and control that they did not see during S3/S4.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cocaine Use Disorder

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

The experimental group will compare episodic future thinking (EFT) to the control group, control episodic thinking (CET).
Primary Study Purpose

BASIC_SCIENCE

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Episodic Future Thinking (EFT)

Participants will generate positive future events they are looking forward to at several time points in the future (e.g., 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months, 1 year, and 5 years). Participants will be reminded of these events using cues throughout the study and instructed to think about these cues as they make their decisions. This intervention will be tested in both the presence and absence of stress probes.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Episodic Future Thinking (EFT)

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Participants will generate descriptions of vivid positive future events.

Control Episodic Thinking (CET)

Participants will generate positive recent past events that have happened to them at several time points in the previous day (e.g., 7pm-10pm, 4pm-7pm, 1pm-4pm, 10am-1pm, and 7am-10am). Participants will be reminded of these events using cues throughout the study and instructed to think about these cues as they make their decisions. This intervention will be tested in both the presence and absence of stress probes.

Group Type SHAM_COMPARATOR

Control Episodic Thinking

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Participants will generate descriptions of vivid positive future events.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Episodic Future Thinking (EFT)

Participants will generate descriptions of vivid positive future events.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Control Episodic Thinking

Participants will generate descriptions of vivid positive future events.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

EFT CET

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. demonstrate recent cocaine use and CUD (use in last month, DSM-5 for CUD \> 4)
2. be 18 years of age or older
3. have a desire to quit or cut down on their cocaine use, but do not have proximate plans to enroll in treatment for CUD during the study period

Exclusion Criteria

1. meeting moderate to severe DSM-5 criteria for opioid use disorder
2. having a current diagnosis of any psychotic disorder
3. having a history of seizure disorders or traumatic brain injury
4. having any contraindication for participation in the MRI sessions
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Arizona State University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Carilion Clinic

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Stephen LaConte

Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Stephen LaConte, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Virginia Polytechnic and State University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Fralin Biomedical Research Institute at VTC

Roanoke, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

VT IRB #22-529

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.