Coach Pilot Study: Assessing Cognitive Function and Related Small Vessel Disease Markers After Intracerebral Hemorrhage
NCT ID: NCT05499169
Last Updated: 2024-11-18
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
2 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2022-04-03
2023-04-03
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Cohort Study on the Effects of Aging in Acquired Brain Injury Patients
NCT05499806
Neurologic Deficits and Recovery in Chronic Subdural Hematoma
NCT05900557
Early Brain Damage Assessment in Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Haemorrhage in Predicting Cognitive Impairment
NCT06172556
A Study of Neurodegeneration and Neuronal Fluctuations in Lewy Body Disease and Alzheimer's Disease
NCT06057909
Study on the Mechanism of Cognitive Impairment in Patients with Moyamoya Disease
NCT06832839
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Cognitive decline after ICH might be caused by the underlying etiology of the ICH. The most frequent underlying small vessel diseases (SVD) that cause ICH are cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) and hypertensive arteriopathy (HA). CAA and HA have their own radiological signatures of SVD markers which allow for in vivo tracking of disease progression using MRI. Although the initial clinical presentation these two types of SVD differs - CAA classically presents with a lobar ICH, whereas HA causes deep ICH - both groups of patients are at risk of developing dementia. However, it has recently been shown that patients with lobar ICH develop new onset dementia twice as often as patients with deep ICH. Whether underlying CAA pathology causes this increase, remains unclear. In addition, whether ICH accelerates the process of vascular damage and if cognitive decline can be predicted by certain disease markers is uncertain. Understanding the underlying mechanisms for cognitive decline after ICH helps to improve knowledge of prognosis and clinical management of patients who are recovering from ICH. The overall aim is to study cognitive decline in patients who recover from ICH and the relation with SVD markers. The results will be used to design a larger cohort study.
The study population are patients with ICH that have no family history of hereditary forms of ICH such as hereditary CAA (HCHWA-D) and no cognitive impairment before the ICH. Patients will be aged ≥ 55y, since the radiological Boston criteria for CAA-related ICH only include patients ≥ 55y. At baseline, the premorbid functional status will be assessed with the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) and Barthell index. A 3Tesla MRI will be performed to assess the most likely underlying cause of the ICH (patients with either CAA or HA-related ICH will be included). Stroke severity will be assessed with the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) and a neurologic exam will be performed. Participants will undergo an extensive interview on life-style, vascular risk factors and medication, and will undergo a blood withdrawal. Neuropsychological testing will be performed and questionnaires will be used for screening for depression, anxiety and psychopathology. In addition, participants will be asked to undergo a lumbar puncture to collect cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). After three months, neurological examination, and neuropsychological testing will be repeated. After six and 12 months, the neurological examination, the 3 Tesla MRI and neuropsychological testing will be repeated. Additionally, participants will be asked for a lumbar puncture at these two time points. The main parameters are cognitive decline (according to the neuropsychological assessment) at 12 months. Secondary outcomes are burden of SVD markers on MRI and CSF markers at baseline, at six months and 12 months.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
16 patients with CAA-related ICH
16 patient above the age of 55 that fit the inclusion criteria. CAA-related ICH is defined as an ICH that meets the criteria for definite or probable CAA according to the Modified Boston Criteria.
No interventions assigned to this group
16 patients with HA-related ICH
16 patient above the age of 55 that fit the inclusion criteria. HA-related ICH is defined as ICH located in the basal ganglia, thalamus, or the deep white matter and the presence of hypertension defined as: on treatment for hypertension, or known with high blood pressure (two measurements systolic blood pressure (SBP) \>140 or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) \>90 mmHg) but not treated for hypertension.
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Ability and willingness to provide written informed consent.
3. Supratentorial ICH with CAA or HA as the most likely cause.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Unable to provide informed consent.
3. Pre-existing cognitive impairment assessed with the Informant Questionnaire on Cognitive Decline in the Elderly (IQCODE); scores between 53 - 63 reflect pre-existing cognitive impairment
4. Contra indications, such as: Contra-indications for 3T MRI. Examples of possible contra-indications are:
* Claustrophobia
* Pacemakers and defibrillators
* Nerve stimulators
* Intracranial clips
* Intra-orbital or intraocular metallic fragments
* Cochlear implants
* Ferromagnetic implants
* Hydrocephalus pump
* Intra-uterine device
* Permanent make-up
* Tattoos above the shoulders
* Reduced kidney function (estimated GFR \< 30 ml/min/1,73m2; or nephrogenic systemic fibrosis / nephrogenic fibrosing nephropathy (NSF/NFD))
* Known prior allergic reaction to gadolinium contrast or one of the constituents of its solution for administration
Contraindications for lumbar puncture:
* Intracranial tumor
* Compressio medullae
* Signs and symptoms of increased intracranial pressure
* Local infections of the skin
* A coagulopathy including use of anti-coagulant drugs (INR ≥ 1.8) or thrombocytopenia (\<40)
55 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Leiden University Medical Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Marieke JH Wermer, MD
Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Ellis van Etten, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Leiden University Medical Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Leiden University Medical Center
Leiden, South Holland, Netherlands
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
P20.109
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.