Effect of Alpha-lipoic Acid on Regression of Low-grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions (LSIL)
NCT ID: NCT05485259
Last Updated: 2022-08-03
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
100 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2020-01-15
2022-06-15
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The purpose of this study was to demonstrate efficiency, safety, and clinical benefit of alpha lipoic acid (ALA) in inducing regression of LSIL. The hypothesis is based on the proven role of oxidative stress and inflammation in formation of LSIL and anti-inflammatory and antioxidative efficiency of ALA.
The study was designed as randomized, double-blind, two-arm, placebo-control trial recruiting 100 female patients with diagnosed LSIL. Patients received 600 mg/day of ALA or placebo for 3 months. Progression/regression of LSIL has been defined as primary outcome of the study; inflammation markers and oxidative stress parameters have been defined as secondary outcomes of the study.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Phase I Trial of Silymarin for Chronic Liver Diseases
NCT00389376
Acid Lipase Replacement Investigating Safety and Efficacy (ARISE) in Participants With Lysosomal Acid Lipase Deficiency
NCT01757184
Cholic Acid for Hepatic Steatosis in Lipodystrophy
NCT00457639
Stimulating Fat Tissue Storage With Niacin to Reduce Fat Accumulation in the Liver.
NCT06843148
The Effect of an RBAC Supplement (BRM4) on NAFLD
NCT02568787
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Alpha-lipoic acid (ALA) is a non-essential fatty acid with numerous metabolic roles and its therapeutic potential is being investigated in many pathophysiological conditions. In addition to acting as a cofactor of numerous signalling pathways in the cell, ALA also has a standard redox potential of -0.32 V, which gives it the ability to regenerate the most important physiological antioxidants in vivo (e.g. vitamin C and E) and makes it one of the most potent natural antioxidants. Given that it is implicated as a modulator of various inflammatory signalling pathways, its anti-inflammatory properties have been investigated by a large number of clinical studies. T This impressive array of cellular and molecular functions has led to significant interest in the research and use of ALA as a dietary supplement. ALA has been proven to improve insulin resistance, relieve symptoms of diabetic neuropathy, combine with phototherapy in the treatment of vitiligo, improve wound healing and increase the effectiveness of reduction diets. Its use as a dietary supplement is currently being investigated in dementia, burning mouth syndrome, carpal syndrome, glaucoma, cataracts, hypertension, and peripheral arterial disease. For therapeutic purposes, ALA is administered orally in doses of 300-1800 mg/day, and for some indications its topical and parenteral administration has been investigated. The safety of oral administration in the mentioned doses has been investigated in many clinical studies lasting from 4 months to 4 years. The effectiveness of ALA in premalignant changes of the cervix has not been investigated to date. Considering the proven effectiveness of oral supplementation with other antioxidants (such as green tea polyphenols or Se) in patients with LSIL, the aim of this research is to investigate, for the first time, the effectiveness of ALA in regression of LSIL.
The study was designed as double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial where participants were asked to self-administer either 600 mg of ALA in form of 2 capsules containing 300 mg of ALA (donated by Zada Pharmaceuticals, Lukavac, Bosnia and Herzegovina) or a placebo (provided as identical oral capsules containing rice starch, also donated by Zada Pharmaceuticals) per os daily for 3 months. The research protocol for this study has been approved by the Ethics Committee of the University of Zagreb, Faculty of Pharmacy and Biochemistry and the Ethics Committee of the University Clinical Centre Tuzla. The trial was performed in accordance with the international, national, and institutional guidelines pertaining to clinical studies and biodiversity rights and it complied with the CONSORT guidelines.
At the initial appointment eligible patients were introduced to the study design. They were informed about the study protocol: aim and the purpose of the study, general methodology, expected roles of the participants, potential risks of participating in the study, potential benefits of the participation in the study, data confidentiality issues, and contact details of investigators who, when necessary, provided any kind of additionally needed information. In case patient agreed to participate in the study, they l signed informed consent form. All participants were asked to give their written informed consent for the inclusion in the study. After inclusion in the study patients filled a baseline questionnaire and provided information on basic anthropometric characteristics, reproductive history, current medication, and major lifestyle characteristics (smoking, level of physical activity). Examination of patients' eating and living habits was conducted using a standardized and validated semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) with the help of trained staff. Patients were advised not to change their diet during the study.
Participants were randomized in the ratio 1:1 for ALA: placebo. Patients were randomly allocated a patient number that determined their supplement allocation. They received two bottles of capsules prelabelled with their study number containing either capsules of ALA sufficient for 3 months of supplementation, or identical capsules of placebo (rice starch) sufficient for 3 months of supplementation. Patients were asked to return the remaining capsules after the 3-month period to assess the adherence. During the supplementation period participants were contacted twice by telephone by a research team member to check possible adverse effects and to improve the adherence. Compliance after enrolment was measured as the percentage of pills taken between visits. Subjects who took less than 75% of pills after randomization were considered as noncompliant and were taken off the study. 3 months after the entry participants were invited to a follow up appointment.
At both initial and follow-up appointment cytological screening, colposcopy and targeted biopsy and histological confirmation of cytological-colposcopic diagnosis wasconducted and blood samples were taken and analysed (assessment of primary and secondary outcomes of the study). The samples were collected at the Gynaecology and Obstetrics Clinic of the University Clinical Centre Tuzla over a period of 18 months. Sample analyses were conducted at the University Clinical Centre Tuzla and University of Zagreb, Faculty of Pharmacy and Biochemistry. Statistical processing, analysis and interpretation of the study results was completed within 6 months from the end of the analysis of the biological samples.
Patients' personal data, data on their lifestyle and eating habits (obtained from the FFQ) and measurements of the primary and secondary outcomes of the study were stored and processed in electronic form of the patients' registry. Data dictionary containing detailed descriptions of each variable used by the registry, including the source of the variable was developed. The registry was operated according to standard operative procedures of the University Clinical Centre Tuzla. Project manager and his associates were obliged to fully comply with the prescribed procedures for the protection of personal data. Patients' data were entered into project databases according to the initials of patients first and last name and using a special code. Their medical documentation was only reviewed by the project manager and his associates, and patients' name was never revealed to third parties. Patients' documentation was accessible to representatives of the Ethics Committee at the institution where clinical study was conducted (University Clinical Centre Tuzla) and representatives of the Committee for the Ethics of Experimental Work of the Faculty of Pharmacy and Biochemistry of the University of Zagreb, which is responsible for approving and supervising the conduct of this research.
Block randomization of patients was performed to ensure balance using an in-house computer program. To determine the sample size, a randomized clinical trial sample size formula was used, where type one (α) error was set at 5% and the study power was set at 90%. Ratio of case to control was 1, and expected dropout was 2%. LSIL wasthe main outcome of the study; expected proportion of LSIL in control group was 50%, and in the treated group 40%. Assuming a dropout 2% the target sample size has been determined to be 96 (48 subjects per group). The research results (qualification of cervical squamous epithelium lesions, parameters of inflammation, parameters of oxidative stress) was statistically processed using the MedCalc software package. The basic features of the variables were tested using descriptive analysis. The normality of data distribution was tested using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, and parametric or non-parametric statistical tests were used for further analysis of the results.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
DL-alpha lipoic acid
600 mg (2x300 mg) of DL-alpha lipoic acid in capsules, per os daily for 3 months
DL-alpha lipoic acid
Treatment group recieves 600 mg of DL-alpha lipoic acid daily, per os, for 3 months.
Placebo
600 mg (2\*300 mg) of placebo (rice starch) in capsules, per os, daily for 3 months
placebo (rice starch)
Placebo group recieves 600 mg (2x300 mg) of placebo (rice starch) daily, per os, for 3 months
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
DL-alpha lipoic acid
Treatment group recieves 600 mg of DL-alpha lipoic acid daily, per os, for 3 months.
placebo (rice starch)
Placebo group recieves 600 mg (2x300 mg) of placebo (rice starch) daily, per os, for 3 months
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* sexually active women.
Exclusion Criteria
* malignant diseases
* diabetes
* chronic inflammatory diseases
* hysterectomy
* destructive therapy of the cervix
* abortion
* HPV vaccination
* menopause
18 Years
55 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University Clinical Center Tuzla
OTHER
University of Zagreb
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Dubravka Vitali Čepo
Prof.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Dubravka Vitali Čepo, prof
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Zagreb, Faculty of Pharmacy and Biochemistry
Zinaida Karasalihović, prof
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
University Clinical Center Tuzla
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University Clinical Center Tuzla
Tuzla, , Bosnia and Herzegovina
University of Zagreb
Zagreb, Dep. of Food Chemistry, Croatia
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
ALA-SIL-1719
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.