Ketofol Versus Propofol for Sedation in Cholangiopancreatography for ASA III and ASA IV Patients.
NCT ID: NCT05473949
Last Updated: 2022-08-09
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
102 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-10-01
2017-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Patient-controlled Sedation With Propofol During Cataract Surgery Under Topical Anesthesia
NCT02771912
Study on Opioid-free Anesthesia Protocol With S-ketamine and Propofol
NCT05242081
Comparison Between Continuous Infusion and Intermittent Bolus Injection of Propofol for Deep Sedation During ERCP
NCT01900938
Comparison of Propofol/Alfentanil With Propofol/Ketamine
NCT02000206
Effect Site Controlled, Reaction Time Safeguarded, Patient Maintained Sedation With Propofol in Healthy Volunteers
NCT00321360
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The sample was calculated for a significance level of 5% and a test power of 95%, assuming that, on average, the primary outcome of this study - respiratory depression - is observed in 3% of the population undergoing sedation with ketofol and to 25% of patients undergoing sedation with propofol. The result of the calculation includes 51 patients for each branch of the study (considering the one-tailed hypothesis test).
Data collection is expected to take place over 5 months, taking place between October 2016 and March 2017.
The study is designed to be blinded to the patient and the anesthesiologist/investigator.
The anesthesia nurse, after preparing the drugs according to the instructions on the envelope containing the branch of the study to which the patient belongs, should label each syringe in a non-committal manner.
Statistical analysis was performed using the IBM SPSS Statistics 27.
It will not be necessary to resort to the monitoring committee, since no method or technique different from the one usually practiced will be applied
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
OTHER
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Propofol
ASA Standard monitorization and nasal spectacle capnography (OC) were used. Supplementary supply of O2 is placed at 2-3 L/min also by OC.
The drugs were randomized of the study begins. The investigators didn't know whether ketamine is present in syringes prepared with propofol or not, acting in the same way for both drug combinations.
Sedation was performed with:
1\. Propofol: induction with a bolus of 1% propofol (10mL syringe) administered at a dose of 0.75mg/kg; maintenance with 1% propofol infusion (20mL syringe), at an infusion rate of 6-7mg/kg/h.
In both arms:
* 4 mg of I.V. dexamethasone were administered.
* At the beginning of the procedure and atropine and ephedrine were prepared.
* At the end of the procedure, paracetamol I.V. 15mg/kg was administered.
* If the patient reports VAS\>3 pain in recovery, metamizole magnesium 15mg/kg is also administered.
* In case of post-procedure nausea and/or vomiting, 4 mg of ondansetron would be administered as a rescue.
Profofol for Sedation in Cholangiopancreatography for ASA III and ASA IV Patients
Use of 1% Propofol (Indution dose: 0.75mg/kg Maintenance dose: 6-7mg/kg/h) for Sedation in Cholangiopancreatography for ASA III and ASA IV Patients
Ketofol
2\. Sedation with ketofol in a 1:4 dilution: induction of sedation with bolus of ketofol (dilution containing 9.5 mL of 1% propofol + 0.5 mL of 5% ketamine) (10mL syringe), administered at a dose of 0.75 mg/kg; maintenance with ketofol infusion (dilution containing 19 mL of 1% Propofol + 1 mL of 5% Ketamine), (20mL syringe), at an infusion rate of 6-7mg/kg/h.
The dose used for bolus induction of sedation in both arms of the study is titrated to the needs of each individual patient, although the target approximates the usual recommended dose. If a propofol or ketofol syringe is insufficient considering the patient's weight, another syringe will be prepared with exactly the same dilution as the first.
The study was always blind to the investigators.
Ketofol for Sedation in Cholangiopancreatography for ASA III and ASA IV Patients
use of Ketofol (1% Propofol + 5% Ketamine with a ratio 1/4) Indution dose: 0.75mg/kg Maintenance dose: 6-7mg/kg/h) for Sedation in Cholangiopancreatography for ASA III and ASA IV Patients
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Profofol for Sedation in Cholangiopancreatography for ASA III and ASA IV Patients
Use of 1% Propofol (Indution dose: 0.75mg/kg Maintenance dose: 6-7mg/kg/h) for Sedation in Cholangiopancreatography for ASA III and ASA IV Patients
Ketofol for Sedation in Cholangiopancreatography for ASA III and ASA IV Patients
use of Ketofol (1% Propofol + 5% Ketamine with a ratio 1/4) Indution dose: 0.75mg/kg Maintenance dose: 6-7mg/kg/h) for Sedation in Cholangiopancreatography for ASA III and ASA IV Patients
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* ASA III and IV
* Submitted to retrograde cholangiopancreatography
Exclusion Criteria
* ASA I, II and V
* Ketamine contraindications
* Allergies to Propofol, Ketamine, dexamethasone, paracetamol, metamizole, ondanseteon or other.
* General anesthesia necessary I
* Incapacitaty to sign or absence of patient legal representation.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Centro Hospitalar Universitário Lisboa Norte
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Henrique Xavier Ornelas Gouveia
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Amélia Almeida
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Lisboa Norte
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Standard for basis anesthetic monitoring - Committee of Origin: Standards and Practice Parameters; Approved by the ASA House of Delegates on October 21, 1986, and last amended on October 20, 2010 with an effective date of July 1, 2011
Statement on nonoperating room anesthetizing locations - Committee of origin: Standards and Practice Parameters; Approved by the ASA House of Delegates in October 19,1994, and last amended on October 16, 2013
Green SM, Andolfatto G, Krauss B. Ketofol for procedural sedation? Pro and con. Ann Emerg Med. 2011 May;57(5):444-8. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2010.12.009. Epub 2011 Jan 14. No abstract available.
Ronald D. Miller, Miller's Anesthesia, 7th edition, Section III - Anesthetic Pharmacology, Chapter 26: Intravenous Anesthetics, p. 724
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
566/15
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.